Cumulative Cancer Locations is a Novel Metric for Predicting Active Surveillance Outcomes: A Multicenter Study

被引:5
作者
Erickson, Andrew M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Luzzago, Stefano [4 ,5 ]
Semjonow, Axel [6 ]
Vasarainen, Hanna [2 ]
Laajala, Teemu D. [1 ,7 ]
Musi, Gennaro [4 ]
de Cobelli, Ottavio [4 ,5 ]
Mirtti, Tuomas [1 ,3 ]
Rannikko, Antti [2 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Inst Mol Med Finland, Tukholmankatu 8 A, FIN-00290 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Helsinki Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Helsinki, Finland
[3] Helsinki Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, HUSLAB, Helsinki, Finland
[4] European Inst Oncol, Dept Urol, Milan, Italy
[5] Univ Milan, Milan, Italy
[6] Univ Hosp Munster, Prostate Ctr, Dept Urol, Munster, Germany
[7] Univ Turku, Dept Math & Stat, Turku, Finland
[8] Univ Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY | 2018年 / 1卷 / 04期
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Active surveillance; Biopsy; Cancer location; Cumulative cancer locations; Diagnosis; Discontinuation; Gleason upgrade; Prostatic neoplasms; Pathology; Survival; RISK PROSTATE-CANCER; BIOPSIES; PROGRESSION; SPECIMENS; VOLUME;
D O I
10.1016/j.euo.2018.04.006
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Active surveillance (AS) of prostate cancer (PC) has increased in popularity to address overtreatment. Objective: To determine whether a novel metric, cumulative cancer locations (CCLO), can predict AS outcomes in a group of AS patients with low and very low risk. Design, setting, and participants: CCLO is obtained by summing the total number of histological cancer-positive locations in both diagnostic and confirmatory biopsies (Bx). The retrospective study cohort comprised three prospective AS cohorts (Helsinki University Hospital: n = 316; European Institute of Oncology: n = 204; and University of Mtinster: n = 89). Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: We analyzed whether risk stratifi- cation based on CCLO predicts different AS outcomes: protocol-based discontinuation (PBD), Gleason upgrading (GU) during AS, and adverse findings in radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens. Result: In Kaplan Meier analyses, patients in the CCLO high-risk group experienced significantly shorter event-free survival for all outcomes (PBD, GU, and adverse RP findings; all p < 0.002). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, patients in the CCLO high-risk group had a significantly higher risk of experiencing PBD (hazard ratio [HR] 12.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.18-23.9; p < 0.001), GU (HR 6.01, 95% CI 2.16-16.8; p = 0.002), and adverse RP findings (HR 9.144, 95% CI 2.27-36.9; p = 0.006). In receiver operating characteristic analyses, the area under the curve for CCLO outperformed the number of cancer-positive Bxs in confirmatory Bx in predicting PBD (0.734 vs 0.682), GU (0.655 vs 0.576) and adverse RP findings (0.662 vs 0.561) and the added value was supported by decision curve analysis. Conclusions: CCLO is distinct from the number of positive Bx cores. Higher CCLO predicts AS outcomes and may aid in selection of patients for AS. Patient summary: For patients on active surveillance for prostate cancer, the cumulative number of cancer-positive locations in diagnostic and confirmatory biopsies is a predictor of active surveillance outcomes. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association of Urology.
引用
收藏
页码:268 / 275
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study
    Ahmed, Hashim U.
    Bosaily, Ahmed El-Shater
    Brown, Louise C.
    Gabe, Rhian
    Kaplan, Richard
    Parmar, Mahesh K.
    Collaco-Moraes, Yolanda
    Ward, Katie
    Hindley, Richard G.
    Freeman, Alex
    Kirkham, Alex P.
    Oldroyd, Robert
    Parker, Chris
    Emberton, Mark
    [J]. LANCET, 2017, 389 (10071) : 815 - 822
  • [2] The Critical Role of the Pathologist in Determining Eligibility for Active Surveillance as a Management Option in Patients With Prostate Cancer Consensus Statement With Recommendations Supported by the College of American Pathologists, International Society of Urological Pathology, Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology, the New Zealand Society of Pathologists, and the Prostate Cancer Foundation
    Amin, Mahul B.
    Lin, Daniel W.
    Gore, John L.
    Srigley, John R.
    Samaratunga, Hema
    Egevad, Lars
    Rubin, Mark
    Nacey, John
    Carter, H. Ballentine
    Klotz, Laurence
    Sandler, Howard
    Zietman, Anthony L.
    Holden, Stuart
    Montironi, Rodolfo
    Humphrey, Peter A.
    Evans, Andrew J.
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    Delahunt, Brett
    McKenney, Jesse K.
    Berney, Dan
    Wheeler, Thomas M.
    Chinnaiyan, Arul M.
    True, Lawrence
    Knudsen, Beatrice
    Hammond, M. Elizabeth H.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2014, 138 (10) : 1387 - 1405
  • [3] ERG Protein Expression in Diagnostic Specimens Is Associated with Increased Risk of Progression During Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer
    Berg, Kasper Drimer
    Vainer, Ben
    Thomsen, Frederik Birkebaek
    Roder, M. Andreas
    Gerds, Thomas Alexander
    Toft, Birgitte Gronkaer
    Brasso, Klaus
    Iversen, Peter
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 66 (05) : 851 - 860
  • [4] A Decade of Active Surveillance in the PRIAS Study: An Update and Evaluation of the Criteria Used to Recommend a Switch to Active Treatment
    Bokhorst, Leonard P.
    Valdagni, Riccardo
    Rannikko, Antti
    Kakehi, Yoshiyuki
    Pickles, Tom
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 70 (06) : 954 - 960
  • [5] The Movember Foundation's GAP3 cohort: a profile of the largest global prostate cancer active surveillance database to date
    Bruinsma, Sophie M.
    Zhang, Liying
    Roobol, Monique J.
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    Nieboer, Daan
    Van Hemelrijck, Mieke
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 121 (05) : 737 - 744
  • [6] Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a narrative review of clinical guidelines
    Bruinsma, Sophie M.
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Carroll, Peter R.
    Leapman, Michael S.
    Rannikko, Antti
    Petrides, Neophytos
    Weerakoon, Mahesha
    Bokhorst, Leonard P.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY, 2016, 13 (03) : 151 - 167
  • [7] Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Worldwide: The PRIAS Study
    Bul, Meelan
    Zhu, Xiaoye
    Valdagni, Riccardo
    Pickles, Tom
    Kakehi, Yoshiyuki
    Rannikko, Antti
    Bjartell, Anders
    van der Schoot, Deric K.
    Cornel, Erik B.
    Conti, Giario N.
    Boeve, Egbert R.
    Staerman, Frederic
    Vis-Maters, Jenneke J.
    Vergunst, Henk
    Jaspars, Joris J.
    Stroelin, Petra
    van Muilekom, Erik
    Schroder, Fritz H.
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2013, 63 (04) : 597 - 603
  • [8] Morphometric studies of intra-prostatic volume relationships in localized prostatic cancer
    Haggman, M
    Nordin, B
    Mattson, S
    Busch, C
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 80 (04): : 612 - 617
  • [9] 10-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer
    Hamdy, F. C.
    Donovan, J. L.
    Lane, J. A.
    Mason, M.
    Metcalfe, C.
    Holding, P.
    Davis, M.
    Peters, T. J.
    Turner, E. L.
    Martin, R. M.
    Oxley, J.
    Robinson, M.
    Staffurth, J.
    Walsh, E.
    Bollina, P.
    Catto, J.
    Doble, A.
    Doherty, A.
    Gillatt, D.
    Kockelbergh, R.
    Kynaston, H.
    Paul, A.
    Powell, P.
    Prescott, S.
    Rosario, D. J.
    Rowe, E.
    Neal, D. E.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2016, 375 (15) : 1415 - 1424
  • [10] Geometric Evaluation of Systematic Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Prostate Biopsy
    Han, Misop
    Chang, Doyoung
    Kim, Chunwoo
    Lee, Brian J.
    Zuo, Yihe
    Kim, Hyung-Joo
    Petrisor, Doru
    Trock, Bruce
    Partin, Alan W.
    Rodriguez, Ronald
    Carter, H. Ballentine
    Allaf, Mohamad
    Kim, Jongwon
    Stoianovici, Dan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 188 (06) : 2404 - 2409