EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT FOLIAR FERTILIZERS ON THE CROP PRODUCTION OF SUGARCANE

被引:8
作者
Raposo Junior, Jorge Luiz [1 ]
Gomes Neto, Jose Anchieta [1 ]
Silva Sacramento, Luis Vitor [2 ]
机构
[1] UNESP Sao Paulo State Univ, Inst Chem, Dept Analyt Chem, BR-14801970 Araraquara, SP, Brazil
[2] UNESP Sao Paulo State Univ, Sch Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Nat Subst & Toxicol, BR-14801970 Araraquara, SP, Brazil
关键词
Saccharum; foliar fertilizers; plant nutrition; cane yield; MANAGEMENT; QUEENSLAND; GROWTH; YIELD; TRASH;
D O I
10.1080/01904167.2012.748066
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Influence of different foliar fertilizers (phosphite, micronutrients, biostimulant, phosphite + micronutrients, phosphite + biostimulant, micronutrients + biostimulant and phosphite + micronutrients + biostimulant) on yield of sugarcane was evaluated after fertilization at 30, 90 and 150 days after harvesting two-year-old sugarcane. The experiment was carried out in a commercial crop employing a randomized block design in four replicates. Higher stalk masses were observed for fertilization at 30 days after harvest, and the higher content of sucrose, total recoverable sugar and Brix degrees were observed for sugarcane fertilized after 150 days. Statistical analysis (Duncan's test) revealed no significant variation (P < 0.05) in Brix degree, sucrose content and total recoverable sugar. For total recoverable sugar x stalk weight (the main payment type for sugarcane producers), the following sequence (time treatment, fertilizer composition) 30-days, micronutrient + biostimulant; 150-days, biostimulant; and 90-days, biostimulant increased 11%, 17%, and 21% the yield of sugarcane.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 469
页数:11
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Shoot and stalk dynamics and the yield of sugarcane crops in tropical and subtropical Queensland, Australia [J].
Bella, MJ ;
Garside, AL .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2005, 92 (2-3) :231-248
[2]   Impact of cultivation and sugar-cane green trash management on carbon fractions and aggregate stability for a Chromic Luvisol in Queensland, Australia [J].
Blair, N .
SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2000, 55 (3-4) :183-191
[3]  
Dourado-Neto D., 1999, Scientia Agricola, V56, P1215
[4]   SOIL TESTING, FOLIAR ANALYSIS, AND DRIS AS GUIDES FOR SUGARCANE FERTILIZATION [J].
ELWALI, AMO ;
GASCHO, GJ .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1984, 76 (03) :466-470
[5]   Sugarcane growth and yield responses to a 3-month summer flood [J].
Gilbert, R. A. ;
Rainbolt, C. R. ;
Morris, D. R. ;
McCray, J. M. .
AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2008, 95 (03) :283-291
[6]   Direct determination of total sulfur in wine using a continuum-source atomic-absorption spectrometer and an air-acetylene flame [J].
Huang, MD ;
Becker-Ross, H ;
Florek, S ;
Heitmann, U ;
Okruss, M .
ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2005, 382 (08) :1877-1881
[7]   Breeding for improved sugar content in sugarcane [J].
Jackson, PA .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2005, 92 (2-3) :277-290
[8]  
Malavolta E., 1997, Avaliacao do estado nutricional das plantas: Principios e aplicacoes, V1rd
[9]   Soil temperature in a sugar-cane crop as a function of the management system [J].
Oliveira, JCM ;
Timm, LC ;
Tominaga, TT ;
Cássaro, FAM ;
Reichardt, K ;
Bacchi, OOS ;
Dourado Neto, D ;
Câmara, GMD .
PLANT AND SOIL, 2001, 230 (01) :61-66
[10]   Analysis of gene expression profiles under water stress in tolerant and sensitive sugarcane plants [J].
Rodrigues, Fabiana Aparecida ;
de Laia, Marcelo Luiz ;
Zingaretti, Sonia Marli .
PLANT SCIENCE, 2009, 176 (02) :286-302