Discrete element modelling of cyclic loads of geogrid-reinforced ballast under confined and unconfined conditions

被引:122
作者
Chen, Cheng [1 ]
McDowell, G. R. [1 ]
Thom, N. H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Fac Engn, Nottingham Ctr Geomech, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[2] Univ Nottingham, Fac Engn, Nottingham Transportat Engn Ctr, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
关键词
Discrete element modelling; Geogrid reinforcement; Cyclic loading; Optimum location; Settlement;
D O I
10.1016/j.geotexmem.2012.07.004
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
The discrete element method has been used to simulate cyclic loading of geogrid-reinforced ballast under confined and unconfined conditions. For the confined condition, box tests have been simulated on unreinforced samples and reinforced samples with different geogrid positions and geogrid apertures. The response of the ballast layer reinforced with geogrid under repeated loading agrees with experimental results. It was found that the optimum location of geogrid is 100 mm depth from base, and the triaxial geogrid outperforms biaxial geogrid. For the unconfined condition, cyclic loading of a trough of ballast (the Composite Element Test (CET) devised by Brown et al. (2007)) has also been simulated, and the sample with the geogrid at 50 mm from the sub-ballast layer performs better than that at 100 mm or 150 mm from the sub-ballast. It was also found that the used of two geogrids at both 50 mm and 150 mm from the sub-ballast gave smaller settlement than using a single layer geogrid, or the unreinforced ballast. However the double-reinforced ballast performs only marginally better than the sample reinforced 50 mm above the sub-ballast. The geogrid reinforcement limits the lateral displacement in reinforced zone, which is approximately 50 mm above and below the geogrid. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:76 / 86
页数:11
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Investigation of geotextile-soil interaction under a cyclic vertical load using the discrete element method [J].
Bhandari, Anil ;
Han, Jie .
GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2010, 28 (01) :33-43
[2]   Identifying the key parameters that influence geogrid reinforcement of railway ballast [J].
Brown, S. F. ;
Kwan, J. ;
Thoma, N. H. .
GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2007, 25 (06) :326-335
[3]  
Chen C., 2012, GEOMECHANIC IN PRESS
[4]   DISCRETE NUMERICAL-MODEL FOR GRANULAR ASSEMBLIES [J].
CUNDALL, PA ;
STRACK, ODL .
GEOTECHNIQUE, 1979, 29 (01) :47-65
[5]   Smear behavior of railway ballast based on large-scale triaxial tests [J].
Indraratna, B ;
Ionescu, D ;
Christie, HD .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 1998, 124 (05) :439-449
[6]  
Itasca, 2003, PRACT FLOW COD 3 DIM
[7]  
Konietzky H., 2004, Numerical modeling in micromechanics via particle methods, P3, DOI DOI 10.1201/B17007-3
[8]  
Kwan C.C.J., 2006, Ph.D. Thesis
[9]   Discrete element modelling of railway ballast [J].
Lim, WL ;
McDowell, GR .
GRANULAR MATTER, 2005, 7 (01) :19-29
[10]   Discrete element method analysis of railtrack ballast degradation during cyclic loading [J].
Lobo-Guerrero, Sebastian ;
Vallejo, Luis E. .
GRANULAR MATTER, 2006, 8 (3-4) :195-204