Enriching Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment Populations for Clinical Trials: Optimal Combination of Biomarkers to Predict Conversion to Dementia

被引:24
|
作者
Yu, Peng [1 ]
Dean, Robert A. [1 ]
Hall, Stephen D. [1 ]
Qi, Yuan [2 ]
Sethuraman, Gopalan [1 ]
Willis, Brian A. [1 ]
Siemers, Eric R. [1 ]
Martenyi, Ferenc [1 ]
Tauscher, Johannes T. [1 ]
Schwarz, Adam J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Eli Lilly & Co, Indianapolis, IN 46285 USA
[2] Purdue Univ, Dept Comp Sci, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Alzheimer's disease; apolipoprotein E; biomarker; cerebrospinal fluid; conversion; FDG-PET; magnetic resonance imaging; mild cognitive impairment; prodromal; progression; CEREBROSPINAL-FLUID BIOMARKERS; MEDIAL TEMPORAL ATROPHY; ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE; CSF BIOMARKERS; FDG-PET; HIPPOCAMPAL VOLUME; BRAIN ATROPHY; MRI; MCI; SIGNATURE;
D O I
10.3233/JAD-2012-120832
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The goal of this study was to identify the optimal combination of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), [F-18]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers to predict conversion from amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) to Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia within two years, for enriching clinical trial populations. Data from 63 subjects in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative aMCI cohort who had MRI and FDG-PET imaging along with CSF data at baseline and at least two years clinical follow-up were used. A Bayesian classification method was used to determine which combination of 31 variables (MRI, FDG-PET, CSF measurements, apolipoprotein E (ApoE) genotype, and cognitive scores) provided the most accurate prediction of aMCI to AD conversion. The cost and time trade-offs for the use of these biomarkers as inclusion criteria in clinical trials were evaluated. Using the combination of all biomarkers, ApoE genotype, and cognitive scores, we achieved an accuracy of 81% in predicting aMCI to AD conversion. With only ApoE genotype and cognitive scores, the prediction accuracy decreased to 62%. By comparing individual modalities, we found that MRI measures had the best predictive power (accuracy = 78%), followed by ApoE, FDG-PET, CSF, and the Alzheimer's disease assessment scale-cognitive subscale. The combination of biomarkers from different modalities, measuring complementary aspects of AD pathology, provided the most accurate prediction of aMCI to AD conversion within two years. This was predominantly driven by MRI measures, which emerged as the single most powerful modality. Overall, the combination of MRI, ApoE, and cognitive scores provided the best trade-off between cost and time compared with other biomarker combinations for patient recruitment in clinical trial.
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 385
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Amyloid deposition and CBF patterns predict conversion of mild cognitive impairment to dementia
    Kikukawa, Takayuki
    Abe, Takato
    Ataka, Suzuka
    Saito, Haruna
    Hasegawa, Itsuki
    Mino, Toshikazu
    Takeuchi, Jun
    Kawabe, Joji
    Wada, Yasuhiro
    Watanabe, Yasuyoshi
    Itoh, Yoshiaki
    NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 39 (09) : 1597 - 1602
  • [42] CSF neurofilament light may predict progression from amnestic mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease dementia
    Lim, Bryant
    Grontvedt, Goril Rolfseng
    Bathala, Pradeepthi
    Kale, Shraddha S.
    Campbell, Christopher T.
    Stengelin, Martin
    Sando, Sigrid Botne
    Prassas, Ioannis
    Diamandis, Eleftherios P.
    Brathen, Geir
    NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING, 2021, 107 : 78 - 85
  • [43] Amnestic multiple cognitive domains impairment and periventricular white matter hyperintensities are independently predictive factors progression to dementia in mild cognitive impairment
    Lee, Hyun Kyung
    Lee, Young Min
    Park, Je Min
    Lee, Byung Dae
    Moon, Eun Soo
    Chung, Young In
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 29 (05) : 526 - 532
  • [44] Different deficit patterns on word lists and short stories predict conversion to Alzheimer's disease in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment
    De Simone, Maria Stefania
    Perri, Roberta
    Fadda, Lucia
    De Tollis, Massimo
    Turchetta, Chiara Stella
    Caltagirone, Carlo
    Carlesimo, Giovanni Augusto
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2017, 264 (11) : 2258 - 2267
  • [45] Importance of subtle amnestic and nonamnestic deficits in mild cognitive impairment: Prognosis and conversion to dementia
    Rountree, S. D.
    Waring, S. C.
    Chan, W. C.
    Lupo, P. J.
    Darby, E. J.
    Doody, R. S.
    DEMENTIA AND GERIATRIC COGNITIVE DISORDERS, 2007, 24 (06) : 476 - 482
  • [46] Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Study of Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment and Vascular Cognitive Impairment With No Dementia
    Liu, Yan-Yan
    Yang, Zhong-Xian
    Shen, Zhi-Wei
    Xiao, Ye-Yu
    Cheng, Xiao-Fang
    Chen, Wei
    Chen, Yao-Wen
    Wu, Ren-Hua
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE AND OTHER DEMENTIAS, 2014, 29 (05): : 474 - 481
  • [47] Combined use of biochemical and volumetric biomarkers to assess the risk of conversion of mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease
    Nesteruk, Marta
    Nesteruk, Tomasz
    Styczynska, Maria
    Mandecka, Monika
    Barczak, Anna
    Barcikowska, Maria
    FOLIA NEUROPATHOLOGICA, 2016, 54 (04) : 369 - 374
  • [48] Magnetic resonance spectroscopy in the prediction of early conversion from amnestic mild cognitive impairment to dementia: a prospective cohort study
    Modrego, Pedro J.
    Fayed, Nicolas
    Sarasa, Manuel
    BMJ OPEN, 2011, 1 (01):
  • [49] Comparison of neuroimaging modalities for the prediction of conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's dementia
    Trzepacz, Paula T.
    Yu, Peng
    Sun, Jia
    Schuh, Kory
    Case, Michael
    Witte, Michael M.
    Hochstetler, Helen
    Hake, Ann
    NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING, 2014, 35 (01) : 143 - 151
  • [50] Incremental value of biomarker combinations to predict progression of mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's dementia
    Frolich, Lutz
    Peters, Oliver
    Lewczuk, Piotr
    Grueber, Oliver
    Teipel, Stefan J.
    Gertz, Hermann J.
    Jahn, Holger
    Jessen, Frank
    Kurz, Alexander
    Luckhaus, Christian
    Huell, Michael
    Pantel, Johannes
    Reischies, Friedel M.
    Schroeder, Johannes
    Wagner, Michael
    Rienhoff, Otto
    Wolf, Stefanie
    Bauer, Chris
    Schuchhardt, Johannes
    Heuser, Isabella
    Ruether, Eckart
    Henn, Fritz
    Maier, Wolfgang
    Wiltfang, Jens
    Kornhuber, Johannes
    ALZHEIMERS RESEARCH & THERAPY, 2017, 9