Advancing the theory and practice of impact assessment: Setting the research agenda

被引:153
作者
Pope, Jenny [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bond, Alan [2 ,4 ]
Morrison-Saunders, Angus [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Retief, Francois [2 ]
机构
[1] Integral Sustainabil, South Fremantle, WA 6162, Australia
[2] North West Univ, Sch Geo & Spatial Sci, ZA-2520 Potchefstroom, South Africa
[3] Curtin Univ Technol, Sustainabil Policy Inst, Perth, WA 6845, Australia
[4] Univ E Anglia, Sch Environm Sci, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
[5] Murdoch Univ, Sch Environm Sci, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
关键词
Impact assessment; State of the art; EIA; Research; STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; ASSESSMENT SEA PRACTICE; PERSPECTIVES; PARTICIPATION; REFLECTIONS; MANAGEMENT; NEED;
D O I
10.1016/j.eiar.2013.01.008
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Impact assessment has been in place for over 40 years and is now practised in some form in all but two of the world's nations. In this paper we reflect on the state of the art of impact assessment theory and practice, focusing on six well-established forms: EIA, SEA, policy assessment, SIA, HIA and sustainability assessment. We note that although the fundamentals of impact assessment have their roots in the US National Environmental Policy Act 1969 (NEPA) each branch of the field is distinct in also drawing on other theoretical and conceptual bases that in turn shape the prevailing discourse in each case, generating increasing degrees of specialisation within each sub-field. Against this backdrop, we consider the strengths and weaknesses of collective impact assessment practice, concluding that although there are substantial strengths, the plethora of specialist branches is generating a somewhat confusing picture and lack of clarity regarding how the pieces of the impact assessment jigsaw puzzle fit together. We use this review to suggest an overarching research agenda that will enable impact assessment to evolve in line with changing expectations for what it should deliver. (c) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 9
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Advancing equity via research-practice partnerships: a theory of action for equity-centered RPPs
    Welsh, Richard O.
    McGraw, Kathryn James
    FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION, 2025, 10
  • [42] The delivery and organization of public health in England: setting the research agenda
    Peckham, Stephen
    Hunter, David J.
    Hann, Alison
    PUBLIC HEALTH, 2008, 122 (01) : 99 - 104
  • [43] Advancing understanding of natural resource governance: a post-Ostrom research agenda
    Cumming, G. S.
    Epstein, G.
    Anderies, J. M.
    Apetrei, C., I
    Baggio, J.
    Bodin, O.
    Chawla, S.
    Clements, H. S.
    Cox, M.
    Egli, L.
    Gurney, G. G.
    Lubell, M.
    Magliocca, N.
    Morrison, T. H.
    Mueller, B.
    Seppelt, R.
    Schlueter, M.
    Unnikrishnan, H.
    Villamayor-Tomas, S.
    Weible, C. M.
    CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 44 : 26 - 34
  • [44] The utility of social practice theory in risk research
    Heidenstrom, Nina
    JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH, 2022, 25 (02) : 236 - 251
  • [45] Next generation engagement: Setting a research agenda for community engagement in Australia's infrastructure sector
    Bice, Sara
    Neely, Kate
    Einfeld, Colette
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2019, 78 (02) : 290 - 310
  • [46] Advancing theory and practice for successful implementation of stakeholder management in organisations
    Bourne, Lynda
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGING PROJECTS IN BUSINESS, 2008, 1 (04) : 587 - 601
  • [47] A review of uncertainty research in impact assessment
    Leung, Wanda
    Noble, Bram
    Gunn, Jill
    Jaeger, Jochen A. G.
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2015, 50 : 116 - 123
  • [48] A temporal perspective on refugee employment - Advancing HRM theory and practice
    Szkudlarek, Betina
    Nardon, Luciara
    Toh, Soo Min
    HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2024, 34 (02) : 275 - 291
  • [49] Towards an empirical research agenda for public value theory
    Hartley, Jean
    Alford, John
    Knies, Eva
    Douglas, Scott
    PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2017, 19 (05) : 670 - 685
  • [50] An evaluation of the environmental impact assessment system in Vietnam: The gap between theory and practice
    Clausen, Alison
    Hoang Hoa Vu
    Pedrono, Miguel
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2011, 31 (02) : 136 - 143