Advancing the theory and practice of impact assessment: Setting the research agenda

被引:156
作者
Pope, Jenny [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bond, Alan [2 ,4 ]
Morrison-Saunders, Angus [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Retief, Francois [2 ]
机构
[1] Integral Sustainabil, South Fremantle, WA 6162, Australia
[2] North West Univ, Sch Geo & Spatial Sci, ZA-2520 Potchefstroom, South Africa
[3] Curtin Univ Technol, Sustainabil Policy Inst, Perth, WA 6845, Australia
[4] Univ E Anglia, Sch Environm Sci, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
[5] Murdoch Univ, Sch Environm Sci, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
关键词
Impact assessment; State of the art; EIA; Research; STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; ASSESSMENT SEA PRACTICE; PERSPECTIVES; PARTICIPATION; REFLECTIONS; MANAGEMENT; NEED;
D O I
10.1016/j.eiar.2013.01.008
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Impact assessment has been in place for over 40 years and is now practised in some form in all but two of the world's nations. In this paper we reflect on the state of the art of impact assessment theory and practice, focusing on six well-established forms: EIA, SEA, policy assessment, SIA, HIA and sustainability assessment. We note that although the fundamentals of impact assessment have their roots in the US National Environmental Policy Act 1969 (NEPA) each branch of the field is distinct in also drawing on other theoretical and conceptual bases that in turn shape the prevailing discourse in each case, generating increasing degrees of specialisation within each sub-field. Against this backdrop, we consider the strengths and weaknesses of collective impact assessment practice, concluding that although there are substantial strengths, the plethora of specialist branches is generating a somewhat confusing picture and lack of clarity regarding how the pieces of the impact assessment jigsaw puzzle fit together. We use this review to suggest an overarching research agenda that will enable impact assessment to evolve in line with changing expectations for what it should deliver. (c) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 9
页数:9
相关论文
共 92 条
[81]  
Therivel R., 2009, IMPACT ASSESS PROJ A, V27, P155, DOI DOI 10.3152/146155109X438733
[82]  
Treweek J., 1999, ECOLOGICAL IMPACT AS
[83]   Why is integrating policy assessment so hard? A comparative analysis of the institutional capacities and constraints [J].
Turnpenny, John ;
Nilsson, Mans ;
Russel, Duncan ;
Jordan, Andrew ;
Hertin, Julia ;
Nykvist, Bjorn .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2008, 51 (06) :759-775
[84]  
United Nations, 2012, FUT WE WANT RIO 20 U
[85]  
Van Buuren A., 2009, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, V27, P145, DOI [10.3152/146155109X454311, DOI 10.3152/146155109X454311]
[86]  
Vanclay F., 1995, ENV SOCIAL IMPACT AS
[87]  
VanDeveer StacyD., 2001, Global Environmental Politics, V1, P18, DOI [10.1162/152638001750336569, DOI 10.1162/152638001750336569]
[88]  
Wagner JP, 2004, 7 SPE INT C HLTH SAF
[89]   Theorising strategic environmental assessment: Fresh perspectives and future challenges [J].
Wallington, Tabatha ;
Bina, Olivia ;
Thissen, Wil .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2007, 27 (07) :569-584
[90]   Climate change mitigation and adaptation in strategic environmental assessment [J].
Wende, Wolfgang ;
Bond, Alan ;
Bobylev, Nikolai ;
Stratmann, Lars .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2012, 32 (01) :88-93