The prospective, randomized investigation of the safety and efficacy of telmisartan versus ramipril using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (PRISMA I)

被引:51
作者
Williams, B
Gosse, P
Lowe, L
Harper, R
机构
[1] Univ Leicester, Sch Med, Dept Cardiovasc Sci, Leicester, Leics, England
[2] Hop St Andre, Serv Cardiol Hypertens Arterielle, Bordeaux, France
[3] Boehringer Ingelheim Ltd, Bracknell, Berks, England
关键词
angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; angiotensin II receptor blocker; circadian blood pressure; ramipril; telmisartan;
D O I
10.1097/01.hjh.0000194364.11516.ab
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of once-daily telmisartan and ramipril on blood pressure (BP) reductions during the last 6 h of the dosing interval. Patients and methods In a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint study using ambulatory BP monitoring, 801 patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension were randomly assigned to once-daily treatment with telmisartan 80 mg for 14 weeks or ramipril 5 mg for 8 weeks and then force titrated to ramipril 10 mg for the last 6 weeks. Primary endpoints; were the reduction from baseline in the last 6-h mean ambulatory systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP). Secondary endpoints; included changes in 24-h, morning, daytime and night-time mean ambulatory BP and ambulatory BP response rates. Results Telmisartan 80 mg produced greater reductions in the last 6-h mean ambulatory SBP and DBP compared with ramipril 5 mg (P< 0.0001) and 10 mg (P< 0.0001), and was superior to ramipril for all secondary ambulatory SBP and DBP endpoints (P < 0.05). Ambulatory BP response rates (24-h mean ambulatory SBP/DBP < 130/80 mmHg or reduction from baseline >= 10 mmHg) were greater with telmisartan 80 mg (P< 0.01) than with ramipril 5 and 10 mg. Ramipril was associated with a higher incidence of treatment-related cough (5.7 versus 0.5% for telmisartan). Conclusions Telmisartan was significantly more effective than ramiprilin reducing BP throughout the 24-h dosing interval and particularly during the last 6 In, a time when patients appear to be at greatest risk of cerebro- and cardiovascular events. Both drugs were well tolerated, although ramipril was associated with a higher incidence of cough.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 200
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1992, AM J HYPERTENS, V5, P207
  • [2] CLINICAL-PHARMACOLOGY OF RAMIPRIL
    BALL, SG
    ROBERTSON, JIS
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1987, 59 (10) : D23 - D27
  • [3] The new oral angiotensin II antagonist olmesartan medoxomil: a concise overview
    Brunner, HR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION, 2002, 16 (Suppl 2) : S13 - S16
  • [4] Angiotensin II receptor antagonists
    Burnier, M
    Brunner, HR
    [J]. LANCET, 2000, 355 (9204) : 637 - 645
  • [5] PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF 24-HOUR BLOOD-PRESSURE VARIABILITY
    FRATTOLA, A
    PARATI, G
    CUSPIDI, C
    ALBINI, F
    MANCIA, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 1993, 11 (10) : 1133 - 1137
  • [6] Gerstein HC, 2000, LANCET, V355, P253
  • [7] KAPLAN NM, 1993, CLIN THER, V15, P810
  • [8] Morning surge in blood pressure as a predictor of silent and clinical cerebrovascular disease in elderly hypertensives - A prospective study
    Kario, K
    Pickering, TG
    Umeda, Y
    Hoshide, S
    Hoshide, Y
    Morinari, M
    Murata, M
    Kurota, T
    Schwartz, JE
    Shimada, K
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2003, 107 (10) : 1401 - 1406
  • [9] MORNING INCREASE IN ONSET OF ISCHEMIC STROKE
    MARLER, JR
    PRICE, TR
    CLARK, GL
    MULLER, JE
    ROBERTSON, T
    MOHR, JP
    HIER, DB
    WOLF, PA
    CAPLAN, LR
    FOULKES, MA
    [J]. STROKE, 1989, 20 (04) : 473 - 476
  • [10] CIRCADIAN VARIATION IN THE FREQUENCY OF ONSET OF ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION
    MULLER, JE
    STONE, PH
    TURI, ZG
    RUTHERFORD, JD
    CZEISLER, CA
    PARKER, C
    POOLE, WK
    PASSAMANI, E
    ROBERTS, R
    ROBERTSON, T
    SOBEL, BE
    WILLERSON, JT
    BRAUNWALD, E
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1985, 313 (21) : 1315 - 1322