Bicipital groove orientation: Considerations for the retroversion of a prosthesis in fractures of the proximal humerus

被引:45
作者
Balg, F [1 ]
Boulianne, M [1 ]
Boileau, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nice, Hop Archet, Dept Orthopaed Surg, F-06202 Nice, France
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jse.2005.08.014
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The bicipital groove anatomy is well documented, and this groove is used as a landmark to guide retroversion during implantation of a shoulder prosthesis. Whereas the proximal part of the groove is used in osteoarthritis, the distal part is used in fractures. If used in 4-part fracture cases we must assume that the bicipital groove orientation is constant from proximal to distal. We measured the groove orientation in 40 cadaveric humeri using 3 superimposed computed tomography sections. The reference axis was the transepicondylar axis at the elbow level. The measured angle of the bicipital groove was 55.8 degrees +/- 4.5 degrees at the anatomic neck and 65.1 +/- 3.5 degrees at the surgical neck. This difference (mean of 9.3 degrees, with extremes of -3 degrees and 22.5 degrees) was statistically significant. We confirmed a wide range of variation from 22 degrees to 89 degrees in the orientation of the groove. Because the values listed in the literature for lateral fin placement of a prosthesis have not been measured at the surgical neck level and because of the great variation in groove orientation, we caution surgeons about the use of the bicipital groove as a reliable landmark in shoulder replacement for fractures. Considering the risk of over- or under-retroversion of the prosthesis, we recommend the use of a fracture jig with retroversion set to 20 degrees.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 198
页数:4
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   Tuberosity malposition and migration:: Reasons for poor outcomes after hemiarthroplasty for displaced fractures of the proximal humerus [J].
Boileau, P ;
Krishnan, SG ;
Tinsi, L ;
Walch, G ;
Coste, JS ;
Molé, D .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2002, 11 (05) :401-412
[2]   The three-dimensional geometry of the proximal humerus - Implications for surgical technique and prosthetic design [J].
Boileau, P ;
Walch, G .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1997, 79B (05) :857-865
[3]  
BOILEAU P, 1999, SHOULDER ARTHROPLAST, P297
[4]   Comparison of humeral head retroversion with the humeral axis biceps groove relationship: A study in live subjects and cadavers [J].
Doyle, AJ ;
Burks, RT .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 1998, 7 (05) :453-457
[5]   Surgical landmarks to determine humeral head retrotorsion for hemiarthroplasty in fractures [J].
Hempfing, A ;
Leunig, M ;
Ballmer, FT ;
Hertel, R .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2001, 10 (05) :460-463
[6]   Geometry of the proximal humerus and implications for prosthetic design [J].
Hertel, R ;
Knothe, U ;
Ballmer, FT .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2002, 11 (04) :331-338
[7]   Analysis of the bicipital groove as a landmark for humeral head replacement [J].
Itamura, J ;
Dietrick, T ;
Roidis, N ;
Shean, C ;
Chen, F ;
Tibone, J .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2002, 11 (04) :322-326
[8]   The bicipital groove as a landmark for orientation of the humeral prosthesis in cases of fracture [J].
Kontakis, GM ;
Damilakis, J ;
Christoforakis, J ;
Papadakis, A ;
Katonis, P ;
Prassopoulos, P .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2001, 10 (02) :136-139
[9]   The use of the bicipital groove for alignment of the humeral stem in shoulder arthroplasty [J].
Kummer, FJ ;
Perkins, R ;
Zuckerman, JD .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 1998, 7 (02) :144-146
[10]   Three-dimensional analysis of the proximal part of the humerus: Relevance to arthroplasty [J].
Robertson, DD ;
Yuan, J ;
Bigliani, LU ;
Flatow, EL ;
Yamaguchi, K .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2000, 82A (11) :1594-1602