A randomized trial comparing the Ambu® Aura-i™ with the air-Q™ intubating laryngeal airway as conduits for tracheal intubation in children

被引:56
作者
Jagannathan, Narasimhan [1 ]
Sohn, Lisa E. [1 ]
Sawardekar, Amod [1 ]
Gordon, Jason [1 ]
Shah, Ravi D. [1 ]
Mukherji, Isabella I. [1 ]
Roth, Andrew G. [1 ]
Suresh, Santhanam [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Ann & Robert H Lurie Childrens Hosp Chicago, Dept Pediat Anesthesia, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词
airway devices; clinical trials; laryngeal mask airway; air-Q; MASK AIRWAY; VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPE; PEDIATRIC-PATIENTS; DIFFICULT AIRWAY; FIBEROPTIC INTUBATION; BLIND INTUBATION; CLINICAL-TRIAL; CAUTION; MANAGEMENT; INFANTS;
D O I
10.1111/pan.12024
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objectives To assess the clinical performance of the Ambu Aura-i (Aura-i) in children. Aim To compare the Aura-i with the air-Q intubating laryngeal airway (air-Q) for the purposes of fiberoptic-guided tracheal intubation. Background The Aura-i is a new supraglottic airway designed for tracheal intubation. Materials/Methods One hundred twenty children, ages 1 month to 6 years, were randomized to receive either the Aura-i or air-Q, and divided into three equal subgroups (Group 1, 2, 3) based on weight. The time for successful tracheal intubation was primarily assessed. The ease, time, and number of attempts for successful device insertion, leak pressures, fiberoptic grade of laryngeal view, number of attempts time for removal of the device after tracheal intubation, and complications were secondarily assessed. Results Device placement, tracheal intubation, and removal after tracheal intubation were successful in all patients. There were no differences in the time to successful tracheal intubation through the Aura-i (32.9 +/- 13.3 s), and the air-Q (33.9 +/- 13 s; P = 0.68), or fiberoptic grade of view between devices. There was not a statistically significant correlation between the time to intubation and the fiberoptic grade of laryngeal view in any of the groups. There were no statistically significant differences in the overall leak pressures, air-Q (18.3 +/- 6.1 cm H2O) vs Aura-i (16 +/- 5.1 cm H2O; P = 0.05). In Group 1 (510 kg), leak pressures were higher with the air-Q (23.4 +/- 7.2 cm H2O) than the Aura-i (16.1 +/- 5.2 cm H2O; P = 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in the time for removal between the two devices (P = 0.11). However, with the size 1.5 Aura-i, the pilot balloon of the tracheal tube was removed in order to facilitate the removal of the device after tracheal intubation. Conclusions Both devices served as effective conduits for fiberoptic-guided tracheal intubation. The limitation of the narrower proximal airway tube of the size 1.5 Aura-i should be considered if cuffed tracheal tubes are to be utilized.
引用
收藏
页码:1197 / 1204
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[11]   The new air-QTM intubating laryngeal airway for tracheal intubation in children with anticipated difficult airway: a case series [J].
Jagannathan, Narasimhan ;
Roth, Andrew G. ;
Sohn, Lisa E. ;
Pak, Thomas Y. ;
Amin, Sapan ;
Suresh, Santhanam .
PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2009, 19 (06) :618-622
[12]   GlideScope® video laryngoscope:: a randomized clinical trial in 203 paediatric patients [J].
Kim, J. -T. ;
Na, H. -S. ;
Bae, J. -Y. ;
Kim, D. -W. ;
Kim, H. -S. ;
Kim, C. S. ;
Kim, S. D. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2008, 101 (04) :531-534
[13]   Simple, reliable replacement of pilot balloons for a variety of clinical situations [J].
Kovatsis, Pete G. ;
Fiadjoe, John E. ;
Stricker, Paul A. .
PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2010, 20 (06) :490-494
[14]   A comparison of four methods for assessing oropharyngeal leak pressure with the laryngeal mask airway (LMA™) in paediatric patients [J].
Lopez-Gil, M ;
Brimacombe, J ;
Keller, C .
PAEDIATRIC ANAESTHESIA, 2001, 11 (03) :319-321
[15]   Pediatric airway management: comparing the Berci-Kaplan Video Laryngoscope with direct laryngoscopy [J].
Macnair, David ;
Baraclough, Dan ;
Wilson, Graham ;
Bloch, Mark ;
Engelhardt, Thomas .
PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2009, 19 (06) :577-580
[16]   The Difficult Airway Society 'ADEPT' Guidance on selecting airway devices: the basis of a strategy for equipment evaluation [J].
Pandit, J. J. ;
Popat, M. T. ;
Cook, T. M. ;
Wilkes, A. R. ;
Groom, P. ;
Cooke, H. ;
Kapila, A. ;
O'Sullivan, E. .
ANAESTHESIA, 2011, 66 (08) :726-737
[17]   The laryngeal mask airway in infants and children [J].
Park, C ;
Bahk, JH ;
Ahn, WS ;
Do, SH ;
Lee, KH .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2001, 48 (04) :413-417
[18]   THE LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY IN CHILDREN - A FIBEROPTIC ASSESSMENT OF POSITIONING [J].
ROWBOTTOM, SJ ;
SIMPSON, DL ;
GRUBB, D .
ANAESTHESIA, 1991, 46 (06) :489-491
[19]   Evaluation of air-QTM intubating laryngeal airway as a conduit for tracheal intubation in infants - a pilot study [J].
Sinha, Renu ;
Chandralekha ;
Ray, Bikash Ranjan .
PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2012, 22 (02) :156-160
[20]   Performance of the Pediatric-sized i-gel Compared with the Ambu AuraOnce Laryngeal Mask in Anesthetized and Ventilated Children [J].
Theiler, Lorenz G. ;
Kleine-Brueggeney, Maren ;
Luepold, Barbara ;
Stucki, Franziska ;
Seiler, Stefan ;
Urwyler, Natalie ;
Greif, Robert .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2011, 115 (01) :102-110