A randomized trial comparing the Ambu® Aura-i™ with the air-Q™ intubating laryngeal airway as conduits for tracheal intubation in children

被引:56
作者
Jagannathan, Narasimhan [1 ]
Sohn, Lisa E. [1 ]
Sawardekar, Amod [1 ]
Gordon, Jason [1 ]
Shah, Ravi D. [1 ]
Mukherji, Isabella I. [1 ]
Roth, Andrew G. [1 ]
Suresh, Santhanam [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Ann & Robert H Lurie Childrens Hosp Chicago, Dept Pediat Anesthesia, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词
airway devices; clinical trials; laryngeal mask airway; air-Q; MASK AIRWAY; VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPE; PEDIATRIC-PATIENTS; DIFFICULT AIRWAY; FIBEROPTIC INTUBATION; BLIND INTUBATION; CLINICAL-TRIAL; CAUTION; MANAGEMENT; INFANTS;
D O I
10.1111/pan.12024
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objectives To assess the clinical performance of the Ambu Aura-i (Aura-i) in children. Aim To compare the Aura-i with the air-Q intubating laryngeal airway (air-Q) for the purposes of fiberoptic-guided tracheal intubation. Background The Aura-i is a new supraglottic airway designed for tracheal intubation. Materials/Methods One hundred twenty children, ages 1 month to 6 years, were randomized to receive either the Aura-i or air-Q, and divided into three equal subgroups (Group 1, 2, 3) based on weight. The time for successful tracheal intubation was primarily assessed. The ease, time, and number of attempts for successful device insertion, leak pressures, fiberoptic grade of laryngeal view, number of attempts time for removal of the device after tracheal intubation, and complications were secondarily assessed. Results Device placement, tracheal intubation, and removal after tracheal intubation were successful in all patients. There were no differences in the time to successful tracheal intubation through the Aura-i (32.9 +/- 13.3 s), and the air-Q (33.9 +/- 13 s; P = 0.68), or fiberoptic grade of view between devices. There was not a statistically significant correlation between the time to intubation and the fiberoptic grade of laryngeal view in any of the groups. There were no statistically significant differences in the overall leak pressures, air-Q (18.3 +/- 6.1 cm H2O) vs Aura-i (16 +/- 5.1 cm H2O; P = 0.05). In Group 1 (510 kg), leak pressures were higher with the air-Q (23.4 +/- 7.2 cm H2O) than the Aura-i (16.1 +/- 5.2 cm H2O; P = 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in the time for removal between the two devices (P = 0.11). However, with the size 1.5 Aura-i, the pilot balloon of the tracheal tube was removed in order to facilitate the removal of the device after tracheal intubation. Conclusions Both devices served as effective conduits for fiberoptic-guided tracheal intubation. The limitation of the narrower proximal airway tube of the size 1.5 Aura-i should be considered if cuffed tracheal tubes are to be utilized.
引用
收藏
页码:1197 / 1204
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Awake tracheal intubation through the laryngeal mask in neonates with upper airway obstruction [J].
Asai, Takashi ;
Nagata, Atsushi ;
Shingu, Koh .
PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2008, 18 (01) :77-80
[2]   Blind intubation via the laryngeal mask: a word of caution [J].
Auden, SM ;
Lerner, GM .
PAEDIATRIC ANAESTHESIA, 2000, 10 (04) :452-452
[3]   Jaw thrusting as a clinical test to assess the adequate depth of anaesthesia for insertion of the laryngeal mask [J].
Drage, MP ;
Nunez, J ;
Vaughan, RS ;
Asai, T .
ANAESTHESIA, 1996, 51 (12) :1167-1170
[4]  
DUBREUIL M, 1993, ANESTH ANALG, V76, P527
[5]   Blind intubation through the air-Q laryngeal mask in children - A word of caution [J].
Fiadjoe, John E. ;
Stricker, Paul A. ;
Kovatsis, Pete .
PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2010, 20 (09) :900-901
[6]   A randomised trial comparing the laryngeal mask airway Supreme™ with the laryngeal mask airway Unique™ in children [J].
Jagannathan, N. ;
Sohn, L. E. ;
Sawardekar, A. ;
Chang, E. ;
Langen, K. E. ;
Anderson, K. .
ANAESTHESIA, 2012, 67 (02) :139-144
[7]   A randomized crossover comparison between the Laryngeal Mask Airway-Unique™ and the air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway in children* [J].
Jagannathan, Narasimhan ;
Sohn, Lisa E. ;
Mankoo, Ravinder ;
Langen, Kenneth E. ;
Mandler, Tessa .
PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2012, 22 (02) :161-167
[8]   Prospective evaluation of the self-pressurized air-Q intubating laryngeal airway in children [J].
Jagannathan, Narasimhan ;
Sohn, Lisa E. ;
Mankoo, Ravinder ;
Langen, Kenneth E. ;
Roth, Andrew G. ;
Hall, Steven C. .
PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2011, 21 (06) :673-680
[9]   Retrospective audit of the air-Q intubating laryngeal airway as a conduit for tracheal intubation in pediatric patients with a difficult airway [J].
Jagannathan, Narasimhan ;
Kho, Melanie F. ;
Kozlowski, Ryan J. ;
Sohn, Lisa E. ;
Siddiqui, Aisha ;
Wong, David T. .
PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2011, 21 (04) :422-427
[10]   A Clinical Evaluation of the Intubating Laryngeal Airway as a Conduit for Tracheal Intubation in Children [J].
Jagannathan, Narasimhan ;
Kozlowski, Ryan J. ;
Sohn, Lisa E. ;
Langen, Kenneth E. ;
Roth, Andrew G. ;
Mukherji, Isabella I. ;
Kho, Melanie F. ;
Suresh, Santhanam .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2011, 112 (01) :176-182