The effect of the surface physical properties of polymer substrates on the adhesion and cracking of transparent conductive oxide (TCO) coatings

被引:8
作者
Lee, Seung-Ho [1 ]
Yang, Chan-Woo [1 ]
Park, Jin-Woo [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Dept Mat Sci & Engn, Seoul 120749, South Korea
关键词
Adhesion; Polymer substrates; Surface roughness; ITO; Flexible substrates; INDIUM-TIN-OXIDE; THIN-FILM; ROUGHNESS; TOUGHNESS; STRENGTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.03.070
中图分类号
TB3 [工程材料学];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080502 ;
摘要
This work presents the effects of surface physical properties of compliant polymer substrates on the properties of stiff oxide coatings. In this study, polyethylene terephthalate (PET) is selected as the substrate and indium tin oxide (ITO), which is one of the most extensively used transparent conductive oxide (TCO) materials for electrodes in display applications, is sputter deposited on PET varying thickness (h(f)). Before deposition, PET surface profiles such as roughness and morphology are modified by Ar ion beam treatment At a fixed beam power, treatment time is carefully controlled to vary only the physical profiles, excluding chemical states of the surfaces. PET and ITO surfaces and interfaces are analyzed by atomic force microscopy (AFM) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), respectively. By fragmentation test, the adhesion and cracking of ITO are evaluated. Our investigation reveals that depositing atoms penetrate into the PET surface due to the low density of PET and the initial surface profiles of PET are not maintained during deposition due to its high compliance. When the effective surface area is highly increased by the ion beam treatment, the polymer surface becomes stiffer since the number of penetrating atoms increases. The rough surface features on the stiffer substrate are less deformed during deposition; hence, interfacial interlocking that improves the adhesion becomes effective throughout the deposition. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 33
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Evaluation of thin film adhesion to a compliant substrate by the analysis of progressive buckling in the fragmentation test [J].
Andersons, J. ;
Tarasovs, S. ;
Leterrier, Y. .
THIN SOLID FILMS, 2009, 517 (06) :2007-2011
[2]   Pull-off force measurements between rough surfaces by atomic force microscopy [J].
Beach, ER ;
Tormoen, GW ;
Drelich, J ;
Han, R .
JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE, 2002, 247 (01) :84-99
[3]  
Bhosle V., 2006, J APPL PHYS, V100
[4]   PLASTIC-FLOW OF ISOTROPIC POLYMERS [J].
BOWDEN, PB ;
JUKES, JA .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE, 1972, 7 (01) :52-&
[5]   Strength distributions in polycrystalline silicon MEMS [J].
Boyce, Brad L. ;
Grazier, J. Mark ;
Buchheit, Thomas E. ;
Shaw, Michael J. .
JOURNAL OF MICROELECTROMECHANICAL SYSTEMS, 2007, 16 (02) :179-190
[6]   Adhesion between a thin elastic plate and a hard randomly rough substrate [J].
Carbone, G ;
Mangialardi, L ;
Persson, BNJ .
PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2004, 70 (12) :125407-1
[7]   The mechanical strength of polysilicon films: Part 1. The influence of fabrication governed surface conditions [J].
Chasiotis, I ;
Knauss, WG .
JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICS AND PHYSICS OF SOLIDS, 2003, 51 (08) :1533-1550
[8]   Assessment of the toughness of thin coatings using nanoindentation under displacement control [J].
Chen, J ;
Bull, SJ .
THIN SOLID FILMS, 2006, 494 (1-2) :1-7
[9]   Elastic Modulus of Amorphous Ge2Sb2Te5 Thin Film Measured by Uniaxial Microtensile Test [J].
Choi, Yunjung ;
Lee, Young-Kook .
ELECTRONIC MATERIALS LETTERS, 2010, 6 (01) :23-26
[10]   Buckling and cracking of thin films on compliant substrates under compression [J].
Cotterell, B ;
Chen, Z .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FRACTURE, 2000, 104 (02) :169-179