Stakeholder Mapping for Recreation Planning of a Bahamian National Park

被引:18
|
作者
Eadens, Lisa M. [1 ]
Jacobson, Susan K. [1 ]
Stein, Taylor V. [2 ]
Confer, John J. [3 ]
Gape, Lynn [4 ]
Sweeting, Monique [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Wildlife Ecol & Conservat, Program Studies Trop Conservat, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Sch Forest Resources & Conservat, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[3] Calif Univ Penn, Dept Earth Sci, California, PA USA
[4] Bahamas Natl Trust, Nassau, Bahamas
关键词
Bahamas; park; participatory mapping; planning; recreation; stakeholder analysis; NATURAL-RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; MARINE; PERCEPTIONS; REEFS; GIS;
D O I
10.1080/08941920802191696
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This study engaged key stakeholders in developing a recreation management plan for Abaco National Park. Using a stakeholder analysis and participatory mapping exercises, we determined current and desired future land uses of representatives from the tourism industry, hunters, teachers, business leaders, local community members, and environmentalists. Spatial information was analyzed using a geographic information system (GIS) for trends and overlap among recreational activities and between recreation needs and protection of an endangered parrot. Results indicate a diversity of activities occur in the park, each with a distinct spatial distribution. Stakeholder groups had varied priorities for future park uses; however, all groups desired ecotourism and infrastructure development. Overlap existed among recreational uses and between recreation and parrot protection, suggesting the use of spatial and/or temporal zoning to reduce potential conflict. These methods provided valuable data for integrated conservation and recreation planning and should be applicable to other areas lacking social information for planning and management.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 127
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Application of RS and GIS in Forest Park Planning: A Case Study of Diaoluoshan National Forest Park
    Lin, Zhi
    Zhao, Cong-ju
    Li, Peng-shan
    ECOSYSTEM ASSESSMENT AND FUZZY SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT, 2014, 254 : 353 - 365
  • [22] A seat at the table? Planning, meetings and the 'stable relation' of a joint managed National Park in northern Australia
    Reardon-Smith, Mardi J.
    GEOFORUM, 2024, 150
  • [23] Assessing the utility of stakeholder analysis to Protected Areas management: The case of Corbett National Park, India
    Rastogi, Archi
    Badola, Ruchi
    Hussain, Syed Ainul
    Hickey, Gordon M.
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2010, 143 (12) : 2956 - 2964
  • [24] Hazard Mapping in Urban Environmental Protected Areas: Tijuca National Park
    Santos, Rodrgio B.
    Dourado, Francisco
    Schumm, Leonard
    URBE-REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GESTAO URBANA, 2023, 15
  • [25] Analysis, Systemization of the Impacts of Planning on the Territory: Applied to the Ordesa National Park
    Gonzalez Gonzalez, Maria Jesus
    LAND, 2020, 9 (12) : 1 - 21
  • [26] Characteristic of users at Centrum Park Music as a means of recreation for Bandung community
    Ardiansyah, F.
    Marhanah, S.
    HERITAGE, CULTURE AND SOCIETY: RESEARCH AGENDA AND BEST PRACTICES IN THE HOSPITALITY AND TOURISM INDUSTRY, 2016, : 323 - 326
  • [27] Recreation demand analysis under truncation, overdispersion, and endogenous stratification:: An application to Gros Morne National Park
    Martinez-Espineira, Roberto
    Anioako-Tuffour, Joe
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2008, 88 (04) : 1320 - 1332
  • [28] A Program Encouraging Healthy Behavior, Nature Exploration, and Recreation through History in an Urban National Park Unit
    Tardona, Daniel R.
    Bozeman, Brittany A.
    Pierson, Katrina L.
    JOURNAL OF PARK AND RECREATION ADMINISTRATION, 2014, 32 (02) : 73 - 82
  • [29] Creating a Signature Undergraduate Curriculum In Recreation, Park, Tourism and Leisure Studies
    Russell, Ruth V.
    THERAPEUTIC RECREATION JOURNAL, 2010, 44 (03) : 183 - 200
  • [30] Planning for open space and recreation
    Veal, A. J.
    AUSTRALIAN PLANNER, 2020, 56 (01) : 37 - 47