Understanding the antecedents of collateral learning in new product alliances

被引:37
作者
Lee, Ruby P. [1 ]
Johnson, Jean L. [2 ]
Grewal, Rajdeep [3 ]
机构
[1] Florida State Univ, Coll Business, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
[2] Washington State Univ, Coll Business, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
[3] Penn State Univ, Smeal Coll Business Adm, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
关键词
strategic alliances; new product development; collateral learning;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijresmar.2008.03.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Recognizing that strategic alliances represent an important means for developing knowledge in critical arenas such as new product development, the authors advance the notion of collateral learning that assesses knowledge acquisition internal to a firm in the alliance. To examine its antecedents, the authors build on the behavioral theory of the firm and propose strategic importance and performance vulnerability as the motivational components and organizational similarity and alliance experience as the awareness components advocated in the theory. Results from 133 alliance firms suggest that both the motivational and awareness components are important in influencing collateral learning in new product alliances. Specifically, to develop collateral learning, firms should have extensive alliance experience and an acknowledged stake in their alliance partners. The results also support the theorized U-shaped relationship between organizational similarity of the alliance partners and collateral learning. Thus, collateral learning is facilitated when organizations are either similar or dissimilar, while medium levels of organizational similarity facilitate collateral learning to a relatively lower extent. Although performance vulnerability is found to be associated negatively with collateral learning, extensive alliance experience can attenuate this negative effect. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:192 / 200
页数:9
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]  
ACHROL RS, 1990, DESIGNING SUCCESSFUL, P90
[2]  
Anand BN, 2000, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V21, P295, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<295::AID-SMJ91>3.3.CO
[3]  
2-F
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1995, KNOWLEDGE CREATING C
[5]  
[Anonymous], HARVARD BUSINESS REV
[6]  
Argyris C., 1994, On organizational learning, V1st
[7]   ESTIMATING NONRESPONSE BIAS IN MAIL SURVEYS [J].
ARMSTRONG, JS ;
OVERTON, TS .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1977, 14 (03) :396-402
[8]   Effects of age at entry, knowledge intensity, and imitability on international growth [J].
Autio, E ;
Sapienza, HJ ;
Almeida, JG .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2000, 43 (05) :909-924
[9]   ASSESSING CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY IN ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH [J].
BAGOZZI, RP ;
LI, YJ ;
PHILLIPS, LW .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1991, 36 (03) :421-458
[10]   Marketing, market growth, and endogenous growth theory: An inquiry into the causes of market growth [J].
Bharadwaj, S ;
Clark, T ;
Kulviwat, S .
JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF MARKETING SCIENCE, 2005, 33 (03) :347-359