Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for pediatric patients with upper urinary stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:24
|
作者
Chen, Yiwen [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Deng, Tuo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Duan, Xiaolu [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhu, Wei [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zeng, Guohua [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Guangzhou Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Urol, Minimally Invas Surg Ctr, Kangda Rd 1, Guangzhou 510230, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Guangzhou Inst Urol, Kangda Rd 1, Guangzhou 510230, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Guangdong Key Lab Urol, Kangda Rd 1, Guangzhou 510230, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Retrograde intrarenal surgery; Pediatric upper urinary stones; Meta-analysis; POLE RENAL STONES; KIDNEY-STONES; CHILDREN; URETEROSCOPY; LITHOTRIPSY; MANAGEMENT; INFANTS; SIZE;
D O I
10.1007/s00240-018-1039-9
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of the percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in surgical treatment of pediatric patients with upper urinary stones based on the published literature. A comprehensive literature search of Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library and CNKI was conducted to identify studies comparing outcomes of PCNL and RIRS for treating pediatric patients with upper urinary stones before May 2017. A total of 11 studies, including one randomized controlled trial, four retrospective case-control studies and six case series studies, containing 822 children with upper urinary stones were included in this systematic review. Five of 11 including studies, containing 474 children with upper urinary stones were included in a meta-analysis. Significantly shorter hospital stay and fluoroscopy time were needed by RIRS than PCNL (WMD: 1.44days, 95% CI 0.85, 2.04; p<0.00001) and (WMD: 72.72s, 95% CI 52.13, 93.31; p<0.00001). The overall complications were higher for PCNL compared with RIRS (OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.02, 2.84; p=0.04). However, the minor (Clavien I or II) and major (Clavien III-V) complications rates in the PCNL group were higher compared with RIRS group but the differences were not statistically significant, respectively (p>0.05). RIRS also benefits from significantly less need for blood transfusion (OR 9.09, 95% CI 1.66, 49.78; p=0.01). No significant differences were found in initial, final stone-free rate, and operative times (p>0.05). Our analysis suggested that RIRS turns out to be a safe and feasible procedure alternative to PCNL for children with upper urinary stones in selected cases. Because of the inherent limitations of the included studies, further large sample, prospective, multi-centric and randomized control trials should be undertaken to confirm our findings.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 199
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for pediatric patients with upper urinary stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yiwen Chen
    Tuo Deng
    Xiaolu Duan
    Wei Zhu
    Guohua Zeng
    Urolithiasis, 2019, 47 : 189 - 199
  • [2] Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    De, Shuba
    Autorino, Riccardo
    Kim, Fernando J.
    Zargar, Homayoun
    Laydner, Humberto
    Balsamo, Raffaele
    Torricelli, Fabio C.
    Di Palma, Carmine
    Molina, Wilson R.
    Monga, Manoj
    De Sio, Marco
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 67 (01) : 125 - 137
  • [3] Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery in surgical management of upper urinary stones - A systematic review with meta-analysis
    Jiao, Binbin
    Luo, Zhenkai
    Xu, Xin
    Zhang, Meng
    Zhang, Guan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 71 : 1 - 11
  • [4] Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Upper Urinary Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Jiang, Hongyang
    Yu, Zhe
    Chen, Liping
    Wang, Tao
    Liu, Zhuo
    Liu, Jihong
    Wang, Shaogang
    Ye, Zhangqun
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 2017
  • [5] Different Tract Sizes of Miniaturized Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Gao, Xiao-Shuai
    Liao, Bang-Hua
    Chen, Yun-Tian
    Feng, Shi-Jian
    Gao, Rang
    Luo, De-Yi
    Liu, Jia-Ming
    Wang, Kun-Jie
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2017, 31 (11) : 1101 - 1110
  • [6] Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery versus Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Treatment of Renal Stones &gt; 2 cm: A Meta-Analysis
    Zheng, Changjian
    Xiong, Bo
    Wang, Hongzhi
    Luo, Jun
    Zhang, Chenggou
    Wei, Wei
    Wang, Yarong
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2014, 93 (04) : 417 - 424
  • [7] Comparison of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Micro-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Kidney Stones: A Meta-Analysis
    Gu, Zhenhua
    Yang, Yucheng
    Ding, Rui
    Wang, Meili
    Pu, Jianming
    Chen, Jian
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2021, 105 (1-2) : 64 - 70
  • [8] Re: Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Kallidonis, Panagiotis
    Liatsikos, Evangelos
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 68 (04) : 740 - 741
  • [9] Which is the best treatment of pediatric upper urinary tract stones among extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review
    He, Qing
    Xiao, Kaiwen
    Chen, Yuntian
    Liao, Banghua
    Li, Hong
    Wang, Kunjie
    BMC UROLOGY, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [10] Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Versus Miniaturized Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Kidney Stones &gt;1 cm: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials
    Dorantes-Carrillo, Luis Alberto
    Basulto-Martinez, Mario
    Suarez-Ibarrola, Rodrigo
    Heinze, Alexander
    Proietti, Silvia
    Flores-Tapia, Juan Pablo
    Esqueda-Mendoza, Antonio
    Giusti, Guido
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2022, 8 (01): : 259 - 270