The Determinants of State Legislator Support for Restrictive Voter ID Laws

被引:24
|
作者
Hicks, William D. [1 ]
McKee, Seth C. [2 ]
Smith, Daniel A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Appalachian State Univ, Polit Sci, Boone, NC 28608 USA
[2] Texas Tech Univ, Polit Sci, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA
[3] Univ Florida, Polit Sci, Gainesville, FL USA
关键词
political parties; legislative behavior; legislative politics; legislator preferences; public policy; voter identification laws; PARTY; REQUIREMENTS;
D O I
10.1177/1532440016630752
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
We examine state legislator behavior on restrictive voter identification (ID) bills from 2005 to 2013. Partisan polarization of state lawmakers on voter ID laws is well known, but we know very little with respect to other determinants driving this political division. A major shortcoming of extant research evaluating the passage of voter ID bills stems from using the state legislature as the unit of analysis. We depart from existing scholarship by using the state legislator as our unit of analysis, and we cover the entirety of the period when restrictive voter ID laws became a frequent agenda item in state legislatures. Beyond the obviously significant effect of party affiliation, we find a notable relationship between the racial composition of a member's district, region, and electoral competition and the likelihood that a state lawmaker supports a voter ID bill. Democratic lawmakers representing substantial black district populations are more opposed to restrictive voter ID laws, whereas Republican legislators with substantial black district populations are more supportive. We also find Southern lawmakers (particularly Democrats) are more opposed to restrictive voter ID legislation. In particular, we find black legislators in the South are the least supportive of restrictive voter ID bills, which is likely tied to the historical context associated with state laws restricting electoral participation. Finally, in those state legislatures where electoral competition is not intense, polarization over voter ID laws is less stark, which likely reflects the expectation that the reform will have little bearing on the outcome of state legislative contests.
引用
收藏
页码:411 / 431
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Direct legislation: Determinants of legislator support for voter initiatives
    Hersch, PL
    McDougall, GS
    PUBLIC FINANCE REVIEW, 1997, 25 (03): : 327 - 343
  • [2] Racial Imagery and Support for Voter ID Laws
    Wilson D.C.
    Brewer P.R.
    Rosenbluth P.T.
    Race and Social Problems, 2014, 6 (4) : 365 - 371
  • [3] Politics is local: State legislator voting on restrictive voter identification legislation
    McKee, Seth C.
    RESEARCH & POLITICS, 2015, 2 (03):
  • [4] Voter ID Laws and Voter Turnout
    Heller, Lauren R.
    Miller, Jocelyne
    Stephenson, E. Frank
    ATLANTIC ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2019, 47 (02) : 147 - 157
  • [5] Fear and Implicit Racism: Whites' Support for Voter ID laws
    Banks, Antoine J.
    Hicks, Heather M.
    POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 37 (05) : 641 - 658
  • [6] Correction to: Voter ID Laws and Voter Turnout
    Lauren R. Heller
    Jocelyne Miller
    E. Frank Stephenson
    Atlantic Economic Journal, 2019, 47 (2) : 241 - 241
  • [7] Voter ID Laws: A View from the Public
    Gronke, Paul
    Hicks, William D.
    McKee, Seth C.
    Stewart, Charles
    Dunham, James
    SOCIAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2019, 100 (01) : 215 - 232
  • [8] Voter ID Laws: The Disenfranchisement of Minority Voters?
    Pryor, Ben
    Herrick, Rebekah
    Davis, James A.
    POLITICAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2019, 134 (01) : 63 - 83
  • [9] The Statistical Role in Voter Identification (ID) Laws
    Marker, David A.
    STATISTICS AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2014, 1 (01): : 46 - 50
  • [10] Obstacles to Estimating Voter ID Laws' Effect on Turnout
    Grimmer, Justin
    Hersh, Eitan
    Meredith, Marc
    Mummolo, Jonathan
    Nall, Clayton
    JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2018, 80 (03): : 1045 - 1051