Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: does bougie size affect mean %EWL? Short-term outcomes

被引:83
作者
Parikh, Manish [2 ]
Gagner, Michel [1 ]
Heacock, Laura [2 ]
Strain, Gladys [2 ]
Dakin, Gregory [2 ]
Pomp, Alfons [2 ]
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Miami Beach, FL 33140 USA
[2] Cornell Univ, New York Presbyterian Hosp, Dept Surg, Sect Laparoscop & Bariatr Surg,Weill Coll Med, New York, NY USA
关键词
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy; Bougie size; Weight loss; Weight regain;
D O I
10.1016/j.soard.2008.03.245
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has been increasingly offered to high-risk bariatric patients as the first-stage procedure before gastric bypass or biliopancreatic diversion or as the primary weight loss procedure. The bougie size has varied by surgeon during LSG. The aim of this Study was to determine whether short-term weight loss correlates with the bougie size used during creation of the sleeve. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data from all patients who had undergone LSG at our institution between 2003 and 2006. Revision LSG for failed bariatric procedures was excluded. The data analyzed included preoperative age, body mass index (BMI), bougie size, and percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL). Results: A total of 135 patients underwent LSG during the 4-year period. Most of these patients (79%) underwent LSG as part of a 2-stage operation (either gastric bypass or duodenal switch within a mean of 11 months). The mean preoperative age and BMI was 43.5 years and 60.1 kg/m(2), respectively. The mean BMI and %EWL at 6 months was 47.1 kg/m(2) and 37.9%, respectively. The mean BMI and %EWL at 12 months was 44.3 kg/m(2) and 47.3%, respectively. When stratifying the %EWL by bougie size (40F Versus 60F), we did not find a significant difference at 6 months (38.8% versus 40.6%, P = NS) or 12 months (51.9% versus 45.4%, P = NS). Conclusion: LSG results in significant weight loss in the short term. When stratifying outcomes by bougie size. Our results suggested that a bougie size of 40F compared with 60F does not result in significantly greater weight loss in the short term. However, longer follow-up of the primary LSG group is required to determine whether a difference becomes evident over time. (Surg Obes Relat Dis 2008:4: 528-533.) (C) 2008 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:528 / 533
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity: a review [J].
Aggarwal, Sandeep ;
Kini, Subhash U. ;
Herron, Daniel M. .
SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2007, 3 (02) :189-194
[2]   Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy:: A multi-purpose bariatric operation [J].
Baltasar, A ;
Serra, C ;
Pérez, N ;
Bou, R ;
Bengochea, M .
OBESITY SURGERY, 2005, 15 (08) :1124-1128
[3]   Re-sleeve gastrectomy [J].
Baltasar, Aniceto ;
Serra, Carlos ;
Perez, Nieves ;
Bou, Rafael ;
Bengochea, Marcelo .
OBESITY SURGERY, 2006, 16 (11) :1535-1538
[4]   Malabsorptive gastric bypass in patients with superobesity [J].
Brolin, RE ;
LaMarca, LB ;
Kenler, HA ;
Cody, RP .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2002, 6 (02) :195-203
[5]   Decreased bleeding after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with or without duodenal switch for morbid obesity using a stapled buttressed absorbable polymer membrane [J].
Consten, ECJ ;
Gagner, M ;
Pomp, A ;
Inabnet, WB .
OBESITY SURGERY, 2004, 14 (10) :1360-1366
[6]   Laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity. The future procedure of choice? [J].
Frezza, Eldo E. .
SURGERY TODAY, 2007, 37 (04) :275-281
[7]  
GAGNER M, 2005, LAPAROSCOPIC BARIATR, P145
[8]  
GRUNDY SM, 1991, ANN INTERN MED, V115, P956
[9]  
Han SM, 2005, OBES SURG, V15, P1469
[10]   A prospective randomized study between laparoscopic gastric banding and laparoscopic isolated sleeve gastrectomy:: Results after 1 and 3 years [J].
Himpens, Jacques ;
Dapri, Giovanni ;
Cadiere, Guy Bernard .
OBESITY SURGERY, 2006, 16 (11) :1450-1456