Literature Review Robotic-Assisted Harvest of Deep Inferior Epigastric Flap for Breast Reconstruction

被引:12
|
作者
Khan, Mustafa T. A. [1 ,4 ]
Won, Brian Wong [2 ]
Baumgardner, Kyle [1 ]
Lue, Melinda [1 ]
Montorfano, Lisandro [3 ]
Hosein, Rayaad C. C. [2 ]
Wang, Howard T. T. [2 ]
Martinez, Roberto A. A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Hlth San Antonio, Dept Gen Surg, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Plast Surg, Nashville, TN USA
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Plast Surg, Med Ctr, Nashville, TN USA
[4] Univ Texas Hlth San Antonio, Dept Surg, Gen Surg Residency Program, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
关键词
deep inferior epigastric perforator; breast reconstruction; free flap; robotic surgery; DONOR-SITE MORBIDITY; PERFORATOR FLAP; DIEP; FEASIBILITY; SURGERY; REPAIR;
D O I
10.1097/SAP.0000000000003326
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
IntroductionRobotic-assisted surgery is gaining popularity because of reported improvement in aesthetic outcomes while reducing the occurrence of complications compared with conventional surgical methods. Deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap harvesting has a long track record as a viable procedure for autologous reconstruction of the breast. In this literature review, we describe the feasibility of using the robotic platform in DIEP flap harvest.MethodsThe Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analysis methodology was to guide the literature review. PubMed and Scopus databases were searched from inception to June 6, 2022. The Medical Subject Heading terms and keywords used to conduct this search are as described: "Robotic AND deep inferior epigastric perforator AND Breast reconstruction."ResultsSeven publications, detailing a total of 56 robotic-assisted DIEP flap harvest procedures, were selected for review. Four publications used the transabdominal preperitoneal approach, whereas 2 exclusively used a totally extraperitoneal approach, and 1 compared the 2 approaches. The measured outcomes included technical feasibility of flap harvest in cadavers, viable flap harvest in live patients, harvest time and pedicle dissection time, pedicle length, fascial incision length, donor site pain, need for postoperative narcotic, donor site morbidity, and hernia formation. Overall, the reviewed articles demonstrated successful DIEP flap harvesting without the need for conversion to the conventional open procedure. Postoperative complications were minimal. Robotic DIEP flap harvest was shown to be safe and there were no reports of donor-site morbidity in the studies reviewed. The main advantages of the robotic approach include decreased postoperative pain and length of hospital stay, along with improved aesthetic outcomes. The main disadvantages are increased operative time and cost.ConclusionsAlthough at its current iteration, the robotic-assisted DIEP flap is feasible, it may not be practical in all settings. Furthermore, the true benefit of the robotic platform is yet to be determined, as more long-term studies are necessary.
引用
收藏
页码:703 / 708
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction in the Setting of Cryolipolysis
    Hyland, Colby J.
    Irwin, Timothy J.
    Rinkinen, Jacob R.
    Broyles, Justin M.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2021, 9 (12)
  • [32] Bilateral Breast Revision Augmentation With Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforators/Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery Flaps Case Reports and Literature Review
    Henry, Steven L.
    Huang, Jung-Ju
    Cheng, Ming-Huei
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2010, 64 (04) : 416 - 420
  • [33] Computed tomography angiography (CTA) assisted preoperative planning and volume calculation of deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap for breast reconstruction
    Ronen G.
    Blachar A.
    Abelow A.
    Gur E.
    Barnea Y.
    European Journal of Plastic Surgery, 2017, 40 (5) : 441 - 446
  • [34] Augmentation of Venous Drainage in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction: Efficacy and Advancement
    Xin, Qiang
    Luan, Jie
    Mu, Hua
    Mu, Li
    JOURNAL OF RECONSTRUCTIVE MICROSURGERY, 2012, 28 (05) : 313 - 318
  • [35] Fibrin sealant significantly decrease postoperative drainage in breast reconstruction by deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap
    Heusse, J. -L.
    Hivelin, M.
    Lepage, C.
    Santini, C.
    Lantieri, L.
    ANNALES DE CHIRURGIE PLASTIQUE ESTHETIQUE, 2012, 57 (01): : 50 - 58
  • [36] Evaluation of clinical outcomes of deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstruction and number of flap perforators
    Hassan, Mohamed
    Kholosy, Hassan
    Salem, Iman
    Na, Ghozlan
    Koshy, O.
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 41 (01) : 340 - 346
  • [37] Unilateral Versus Bilateral Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Tekdogan, Boran
    Martineau, Jerome
    Kalbermatten, Daniel F.
    Oranges, Carlo M.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2024, 12 (12) : e6359
  • [38] Unilateral Autologous Breast Reconstruction with Bi-pedicled, Conjoined Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flaps
    Seth, Akhil K.
    Koolen, Pieter G. L.
    Sultan, Steven M.
    Lee, Bernard T.
    Erhard, Heather A.
    Greenspun, David T.
    JOURNAL OF RECONSTRUCTIVE MICROSURGERY, 2019, 35 (02) : 145 - 155
  • [39] Rethinking the superficial inferior epigastric artery flap in breast reconstruction: Video demonstration of a rapid, reliable harvest technique
    Buchel, Edward W.
    Dalke, Kimberly R.
    Hayakawa, Thomas E. J.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2013, 21 (02): : 99 - 100
  • [40] Systematic review of cost-effectiveness in breast reconstruction: deep inferior epigastric perforator flap vs. implant-based breast reconstruction
    Hansson, Emma
    Brorson, Fredrik
    Lofstrand, Jonas
    Elander, Anna
    Svensson, Mikael
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY AND HAND SURGERY, 2024, 59 : 1 - 13