Literature Review Robotic-Assisted Harvest of Deep Inferior Epigastric Flap for Breast Reconstruction

被引:12
|
作者
Khan, Mustafa T. A. [1 ,4 ]
Won, Brian Wong [2 ]
Baumgardner, Kyle [1 ]
Lue, Melinda [1 ]
Montorfano, Lisandro [3 ]
Hosein, Rayaad C. C. [2 ]
Wang, Howard T. T. [2 ]
Martinez, Roberto A. A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Hlth San Antonio, Dept Gen Surg, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Plast Surg, Nashville, TN USA
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Plast Surg, Med Ctr, Nashville, TN USA
[4] Univ Texas Hlth San Antonio, Dept Surg, Gen Surg Residency Program, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
关键词
deep inferior epigastric perforator; breast reconstruction; free flap; robotic surgery; DONOR-SITE MORBIDITY; PERFORATOR FLAP; DIEP; FEASIBILITY; SURGERY; REPAIR;
D O I
10.1097/SAP.0000000000003326
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
IntroductionRobotic-assisted surgery is gaining popularity because of reported improvement in aesthetic outcomes while reducing the occurrence of complications compared with conventional surgical methods. Deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap harvesting has a long track record as a viable procedure for autologous reconstruction of the breast. In this literature review, we describe the feasibility of using the robotic platform in DIEP flap harvest.MethodsThe Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analysis methodology was to guide the literature review. PubMed and Scopus databases were searched from inception to June 6, 2022. The Medical Subject Heading terms and keywords used to conduct this search are as described: "Robotic AND deep inferior epigastric perforator AND Breast reconstruction."ResultsSeven publications, detailing a total of 56 robotic-assisted DIEP flap harvest procedures, were selected for review. Four publications used the transabdominal preperitoneal approach, whereas 2 exclusively used a totally extraperitoneal approach, and 1 compared the 2 approaches. The measured outcomes included technical feasibility of flap harvest in cadavers, viable flap harvest in live patients, harvest time and pedicle dissection time, pedicle length, fascial incision length, donor site pain, need for postoperative narcotic, donor site morbidity, and hernia formation. Overall, the reviewed articles demonstrated successful DIEP flap harvesting without the need for conversion to the conventional open procedure. Postoperative complications were minimal. Robotic DIEP flap harvest was shown to be safe and there were no reports of donor-site morbidity in the studies reviewed. The main advantages of the robotic approach include decreased postoperative pain and length of hospital stay, along with improved aesthetic outcomes. The main disadvantages are increased operative time and cost.ConclusionsAlthough at its current iteration, the robotic-assisted DIEP flap is feasible, it may not be practical in all settings. Furthermore, the true benefit of the robotic platform is yet to be determined, as more long-term studies are necessary.
引用
收藏
页码:703 / 708
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Preliminary experience in breast reconstruction with the free vertical deep inferior epigastric perforator flap
    Santanelli, Fabio
    Paolini, Guido
    Renzi, Luca
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY AND HAND SURGERY, 2008, 42 (01): : 23 - 27
  • [22] "Spin" in Observational Studies in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
    Kim, Patrick J. J.
    Yuan, Morgan
    Wu, Jeremy
    Gallo, Lucas
    Uhlman, Kathryn
    Voineskos, Sophocles H. H.
    O'Neill, Anne
    Hofer, Stefan O. P.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2023, 11 (06) : E5095
  • [23] Pyoderma Gangrenosum Following Bilateral Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction
    Caterson, Stephanie A.
    Nyame, Theodore
    Phung, Thuy
    Lee, Bernard
    Tobias, Adam M.
    JOURNAL OF RECONSTRUCTIVE MICROSURGERY, 2010, 26 (07) : 475 - 479
  • [24] Breast Reconstruction With a Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap: Imaging Appearances of the Normal Flap and Common Complications
    Hedegard, Wade
    Niell, Bethany
    Specht, Michelle
    Winograd, Jonathan
    Rafferty, Elizabeth
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2013, 200 (01) : W75 - W84
  • [25] Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism Based on Caprini Score in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction
    Wu, Shannon S. S.
    Raymer, Charles
    Schafer, Rachel
    Culbert, August
    Bernard, Steven
    Djohan, Risal
    Schwarz, Graham
    Bishop, Sarah N. N.
    Gurunian, Raffi
    JOURNAL OF RECONSTRUCTIVE MICROSURGERY, 2023, 39 (09) : 705 - 714
  • [26] Autologous breast reconstruction by deep inferior epigastric free flap: Classic and minimally invasive extraperitoneal approaches
    Hivelin, M.
    Lantieri, L.
    ANNALES DE CHIRURGIE PLASTIQUE ESTHETIQUE, 2018, 63 (5-6): : 457 - 472
  • [27] Postoperative Tachycardia in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction: Is It a Reason to Worry?
    Bernstein, Jaime L.
    Huang, Hao
    Otterburn, David M.
    JOURNAL OF RECONSTRUCTIVE MICROSURGERY, 2023, 39 (03) : 187 - 194
  • [28] Deep inferior epigastric perforator free flap in elderly women for breast reconstruction: The experience of a tertiary referral center and a literature review
    Dejean, Marie F.
    Dabi, Yohann
    Goutard, Marion
    Taveau, Corentin B.
    Lantieri, Laurent A.
    Lellouch, Alexandre G.
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2021, 27 (09) : 700 - 705
  • [29] The Impact of Perforator Number on Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction
    Grover, Ritwik
    Nelson, Jonas A.
    Fischer, John P.
    Kovach, Stephen J.
    Serletti, Joseph M.
    Wu, Liza C.
    ARCHIVES OF PLASTIC SURGERY-APS, 2014, 41 (01): : 63 - 70
  • [30] Nerve coaptation in deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction
    Dong, Edward T. C.
    Martineau, Jerome
    Oranges, Carlo M.
    GLAND SURGERY, 2025, 14 (02) : 238 - 241