The symbol precedence view of mathematical development: A corpus analysis of the rhetorical structure of textbooks

被引:38
作者
Nathan, MJ
Long, SD
Alibali, MW
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Sch Educ, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Inst Cognit Sci, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Psychol, Madison, WI 53706 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1207/S15326950DP3301_01
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
This study examined a corpus of 10 widely used prealgebra and algebra textbooks, with the goal of investigating whether they exhibited a symbol precedence view of mathematical development as is found among high school teachers. The textbook analysis focused on the sequence in which problem-solving activities were presented to students. As predicted, textbooks showed the symbol precedence view, presenting symbolic problems prior to verbal problems. Algebra textbooks showed this pattern more strongly than prealgebra textbooks aimed at middle school, paralleling grade-level differences found among teachers. Finally, textbooks published after 1990 contained far fewer symbol-only sections, as expected from recent mathematics education reform documents. We interpret these findings in light of research on learning from texts and on the role of textbooks in shaping teachers' instructional practices and students' learning.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 21
页数:21
相关论文
共 73 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], COMPREHENSION
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2019, BELIEFS TEXT INSTRUC
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1997, 9702 U COL I COGN SC
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1989, CURR EV STAND SCH MA
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1999, WORD PROBLEMS RES CU
  • [6] Ball D.L., 1988, For the Learning of Mathematics, V8, P40, DOI DOI 10.12738/ESTP.2014.4.2042
  • [7] REVISING SOCIAL-STUDIES TEXT FROM A TEXT-PROCESSING PERSPECTIVE - EVIDENCE OF IMPROVED COMPREHENSIBILITY
    BECK, IL
    MCKEOWN, MG
    SINATRA, GM
    LOXTERMAN, JA
    [J]. READING RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 1991, 26 (03) : 251 - 276
  • [8] BENSON J, 1994, GATEWAYS ALGEBRA GEO
  • [9] BENSON J, 1991, ALGEBRA 1 INTEGRATED
  • [10] Biber D., 1998, CORPUS LINGUISTICS, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511804489