Effects of tobacco plant residue return on rhizosphere soil microbial community

被引:3
作者
Chen, Jin [1 ,2 ]
He, Jiguang [2 ]
Zhang, Yang [3 ]
Huang, Jie [1 ]
Chen, Zhifeng [2 ]
Zeng, Weiai [2 ]
Deng, Xiaohua [1 ]
Hu, Qiulong [1 ]
机构
[1] Hunan Agr Univ, Changsha 410128, Peoples R China
[2] Changsha Tobacco Co Hunan, Changsha 410001, Peoples R China
[3] Zhuzhou Tobacco Co Hunan, Zhuzhou 412000, Peoples R China
关键词
Tobacco residues; Bacterial community; Fungal community; Network analysis; Keystone species; Functional prediction; ROOT; DYNAMICS; NETWORK; ROTATION; CARBON;
D O I
10.1186/s13213-022-01699-z
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Purpose Based on the recycling principle, returning of tobacco crop residues into the field is a common agronomic practice. However, comprehensive knowledge about the effects of tobacco plant residue return on the rhizosphere soil microbial community is very limited. Methods After tobacco crop residue returning into the potted soil, 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) amplicon sequencing were employed to investigate the bacterial and fungal communities, respectively, from the tobacco rhizosphere soils. Results The results showed that tobacco residue returning increased the diversity of microbial communities (bacteria and fungi) and changed the species composition. It further increased the relative abundance of beneficial microorganisms. After tobacco residue returning, the structure of the rhizosphere soil microbial community network was found more complex with strong interactions among microbial species. In addition, the keystone species of bacterial and fungal communities associated with tobacco rhizosphere soil were altered. This had exerted a driving force to the beneficial bacteria such as Sphiningomonas and Psathyrella to the keystone microorganisms which played important roles in microbial species interaction. Conclusions Tobacco residue return into soil showed significant effects on the microbial diversity, community composition, network structure, keystone microorganisms, and ecosystem functions of tobacco rhizosphere soils. This study provides a scientific basis for the improvement of tobacco field ecosystem functioning and ensuring soil health.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] Soil and foliar sulfur status in some tea plantations of Sri Lanka
    Ananthacumaraswamy, S
    Hettiarachchi, LSK
    Dissanayake, SM
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 2003, 34 (11-12) : 1481 - 1497
  • [2] Sphingomonas: from diversity and genomics to functional role in environmental remediation and plant growth
    Asaf, Sajjad
    Numan, Muhammad
    Khan, Abdul Latif
    Al-Harrasi, Ahmed
    [J]. CRITICAL REVIEWS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2020, 40 (02) : 138 - 152
  • [3] Plant species and soil type cooperatively shape the structure and function of microbial communities in the rhizosphere
    Berg, Gabriele
    Smalla, Kornelia
    [J]. FEMS MICROBIOLOGY ECOLOGY, 2009, 68 (01) : 1 - 13
  • [4] Cehn Hao, 2021, Journal of Anhui Agricultural University, V48, P661, DOI 10.13610/j.cnki.1672-352x.20210909016
  • [5] [陈利军 Chen Lijun], 2015, [土壤, Soils], V47, P340
  • [6] Continuous-cropping tobacco caused variance of chemical properties and structure of bacterial network in soils
    Chen, Shu
    Qi, Gaofu
    Luo, Tian
    Zhang, Hongchun
    Jiang, Qiankun
    Wang, Rui
    Zhao, Xiuyun
    [J]. LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 29 (11) : 4106 - 4120
  • [7] Cui HZ., 2021, AGR SCI RES, V42, P10
  • [8] Network analysis reveals that bacteria and fungi form modules that correlate independently with soil parameters
    de Menezes, Alexandre B.
    Prendergast-Miller, Miranda T.
    Richardson, Alan E.
    Toscas, Peter
    Farrell, Mark
    Macdonald, Lynne M.
    Baker, Geoff
    Wark, Tim
    Thrall, Peter H.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2015, 17 (08) : 2677 - 2689
  • [9] Gao Gui-Feng, 2020, Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, V44, P395, DOI 10.17521/cjpe.2019.0222
  • [10] 不同轮作和秸秆还田方式对黑土细菌群落结构的影响
    高洪军
    李强
    彭畅
    张秀芝
    焦云飞
    高纪超
    朱平
    [J]. 吉林农业大学学报, 2022, 44 (03) : 336 - 344