Productivity and environmental costs from intensification of farming. A panel data analysis across EU regions

被引:35
作者
Antonini, Carla [1 ]
Maria Argiles-Bosch, Josep [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Barcelona, Dept Comptabilitat, Diagonal 696, Barcelona 08034, Spain
关键词
Energy; European agriculture; Fertilisers; Pesticides; Productivity; Sustainability accounting; AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS; RESOURCE; SUSTAINABILITY; PERSPECTIVE; INDICATORS; NITROGEN; IMPACTS; FARMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.009
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper addresses the need of finding new ways of measuring the environmental and economic consequences of farming. The aim of this study is to inquire into the impacts that excessive intensification has on productivity and environmental costs in the long term and additionally, to explore empirically the trend of these two indicators over time. The contribution of this paper is to perform an empirical study of the trends of productivity and environmental costs of farming in the long-term. To this end, this paper performs a panel data analysis of productivity and environmental costs on a farm accounting database across European regions over the 1989-2009 period. The models proposed take (i) farm output per hectare as indicator of productivity, and (ii) expenditures on energy, pesticides and fertilisers per hectare as proxy indicators of environmental costs. Results provide empirical evidence that the regions under study have a negative trend of productivity and a positive trend of environmental costs over the time frame mentioned. These results correlate negatively with both, economic and environmental sustainability of farms. Arguably, this is aggravated in the latter due to hidden environmental costs valued at zero in traditional accounting. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:796 / 803
页数:8
相关论文
共 62 条
[31]   How effective are European agri-environment schemes in conserving and promoting biodiversity? [J].
Kleijn, D ;
Sutherland, WJ .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2003, 40 (06) :947-969
[32]   Innovation, organizational capabilities, and the born-global firm [J].
Knight, GA ;
Cavusgil, ST .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 2004, 35 (02) :124-141
[33]  
Krugman PaulR., 2009, MICROECONOMICS
[34]   Effciency and productivity of conventional and organic farms in Finland 1994-1997 [J].
Lansink, AO ;
Pietola, K ;
Bäckman, S .
EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2002, 29 (01) :51-65
[35]   REGULATING THE NEW RURAL SPACES - THE UNEVEN DEVELOPMENT OF LAND [J].
LOWE, P ;
MURDOCH, J ;
MARSDEN, T ;
MUNTON, R ;
FLYNN, A .
JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 1993, 9 (03) :205-222
[36]   A meta-analysis of the differences in environmental impacts between organic and conventional farming [J].
Mondelaers, Koen ;
Aertsens, Joris ;
Van Huylenbroeck, Guido .
BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL, 2009, 111 (10) :1098-1119
[37]  
OECD, 2012, WAT QUAL AGR M POL C
[38]   Do CAP payments reduce farm labour migration? A panel data analysis across EU regions [J].
Olper, Alessandro ;
Raimondi, Valentina ;
Cavicchioli, Daniele ;
Vigani, Mauro .
EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 41 (05) :843-873
[39]  
Pimentel D., 2012, ENVIRON DEV SUSTAIN, V14, P1, DOI DOI 10.1007/s10668-011-9325-5
[40]   Human appropriation of renewable fresh water [J].
Postel, SL ;
Daily, GC ;
Ehrlich, PR .
SCIENCE, 1996, 271 (5250) :785-788