Comparison of Tomosynthesis Plus Digital Mammography and Digital Mammography Alone for Breast Cancer Screening

被引:315
作者
Haas, Brian M. [1 ]
Kalra, Vivek [1 ]
Geisel, Jaime [1 ]
Raghu, Madhavi [1 ]
Durand, Melissa [1 ]
Philpotts, Liane E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Diagnost Radiol, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
关键词
PERFORMANCE; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.13130307
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare screening recall rates and cancer detection rates of tomosynthesis plus conventional digital mammography to those of conventional digital mammography alone. Materials and Methods: All patients presenting for screening mammography between October 1, 2011, and September 30, 2012, at four clinical sites were reviewed in this HIPAA-compliant retrospective study, for which the institutional review board granted approval and waived the requirement for informed consent. Patients at sites with digital tomosynthesis were offered screening with digital mammography plus tomosynthesis. Patients at sites without tomosynthesis underwent conventional digital mammography. Recall rates were calculated and stratified according to breast density and patient age. Cancer detection rates were calculated and stratified according to the presence of a risk factor for breast cancer. The Fisher exact test was used to compare the two groups. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the effect of screening method, breast density, patient age, and cancer risk on the odds of recall from screening. Results: A total of 13 158 patients presented for screening mammography; 6100 received tomosynthesis. The overall recall rate was 8.4% for patients in the tomosynthesis group and 12.0% for those in the conventional mammography group (P < .01). The addition of tomosynthesis reduced recall rates for all breast density and patient age groups, with significant differences (P < .05) found for scattered fibro-glandular, heterogeneously dense, and extremely dense breasts and for patients younger than 40 years, those aged 40-49 years, those aged 50-59 years, and those aged 60-69 years. These findings persisted when multivariate logistic regression was used to control for differences in age, breast density, and elevated risk of breast cancer. The cancer detection rate was 5.7 per 1000 in patients receiving tomosynthesis versus 5.2 per 1000 in patients receiving conventional mammography alone (P = .70). Conclusion: Patients undergoing tomosynthesis plus digital mammography had significantly lower screening recall rates. The greatest reductions were for those younger than 50 years and those with dense breasts. A nonsignificant 9.5% increase in cancer detection was observed in the tomosynthesis group. (C)RSNA, 2013
引用
收藏
页码:694 / 700
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [11] Screening for Breast Cancer: An Update for the US Preventive Services Task Force
    Nelson, Heidi D.
    Tyne, Kari
    Naik, Arpana
    Bougatsos, Christina
    Chan, Benjamin K.
    Humphrey, Linda
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2009, 151 (10) : 727 - W242
  • [12] Digital Tomosynthesis in breast imaging
    Niklason, LT
    Christian, BT
    Niklason, LE
    Kopans, DB
    Castleberry, DE
    OpsahlOng, BH
    Landberg, CE
    Slanetz, PJ
    Giardino, AA
    Moore, R
    Albagli, D
    DeJule, MC
    Fitzgerald, PF
    Fobare, DF
    Giambattista, BW
    Kwasnick, RF
    Liu, JQ
    Lubowski, SJ
    Possin, GE
    Richotte, JF
    Wei, CY
    Wirth, RF
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1997, 205 (02) : 399 - 406
  • [13] Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Is Comparable to Mammographic Spot Views for Mass Characterization
    Noroozian, Mitra
    Hadjiiski, Lubomir
    Rahnama-Moghadam, Sahand
    Klein, Katherine A.
    Jeffries, Deborah O.
    Pinsky, Renee W.
    Chan, Heang-Ping
    Carson, Paul L.
    Helvie, Mark A.
    Roubidoux, Marilyn A.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2012, 262 (01) : 61 - 68
  • [14] Breast tomosynthesis: Present considerations and future applications
    Park, Jeong Mi
    Franken, Edmund A. J. R.
    Garg, Megha
    Fajardo, Laurie L.
    Niklason, Loren T.
    [J]. RADIOGRAPHICS, 2007, 27 : S231 - S240
  • [15] Pisano ED, 2006, NEW ENGL J MED, V355, P1840
  • [16] Digital breast tomosynthesis: Initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography
    Poplack, Steven P.
    Tosteson, Tor D.
    Kogel, Christine A.
    Nagy, Helene M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2007, 189 (03) : 616 - 623
  • [17] Assessing Radiologist Performance Using Combined Digital Mammography and Breast Tomosynthesis Compared with Digital Mammography Alone: Results of a Multicenter, Multireader Trial
    Rafferty, Elizabeth A.
    Park, Jeong Mi
    Philpotts, Liane E.
    Poplack, Steven P.
    Sumkin, Jules H.
    Halpern, Elkan F.
    Niklason, Loren T.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2013, 266 (01) : 104 - 113
  • [18] Comparison of Digital Mammography Alone and Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis in a Population-based Screening Program
    Skaane, Per
    Bandos, Andriy I.
    Gullien, Randi
    Eben, Ellen B.
    Ekseth, Ulrika
    Haakenaasen, Unni
    Izadi, Mina
    Jebsen, Ingvild N.
    Jahr, Gunnar
    Krager, Mona
    Niklason, Loren T.
    Hofvind, Solveig
    Gur, David
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2013, 267 (01) : 47 - 56