Characterization of midface maxillary membranous bone formation during distraction osteogenesis

被引:34
|
作者
Rachmiel, A
Rozen, N
Peled, M
Lewinson, D
机构
[1] Rambam Med Ctr, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Haifa, Israel
[2] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Bruce Rappaport Fac Med, Dept Anat & Cell Biol, IL-31096 Haifa, Israel
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00006534-200204150-00019
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of the study was to follow the early events in bone formation arid neovascularization during maxillary distraction and after the consolidation period and to define the characterization of the new bone in the distracted area. Maxillary osteotomy was performed in seven sheep. In five animals, an external distraction device was used for maxillary lengthening of 20 mm at a rate of 1 mm/day for 20 days. Another two animals served as controls without distraction. Sequential biopsies were performed. The methods used for analysis were histologic, immunohistochemical, arid ultrastructural by transmission electron microscopy. During the 5 days of latency, a fibrin clot was formed that after 5 days of distraction was replaced by granulation tissue, proliferating mesenchyme-like cells, arid capillaries. After 10 days of distraction, the regenerated tissue could be divided into three main zones and two transitional areas: a central zone occupied by many polygonal mesenchyme-like cells and spindle-shaped cells that proliferated intensively; two paracentral zones on both sides of the central zone in which many cells showed morphologic signs of apoptosis leading to a decreased number of fibroblast-like cells embedded in wavy collagen fibers; a transitional area from the central to the paracentral zone in which concentric cellular colonies were believed to represent a novel form of vasculogenesis; distal-proximal zones, located on both sides of the paracentral zones and in continuation with the old bone, showed delicate new woven bone trabeculae that grew continuously in the direction of lengthening arid gradually became mineralized; and a transitional area from the paracentral to the distal-proximal zones in which there was recruitment of preosteoblasts from the distracted tissue to the trabecular tips. These further differentiated into osteoblasts that contributed to the trabecular growth. The histologic feature pattern was similar after 15 and 20 days of continuous distraction. At the end of lengthening, after 20 clays, delicate longitudinally oriented trabeculae continued to grow by recruiting preosteogenic cells from the central distracted tissue, became mineralized, and were rimmed by osteoblasts. After 6 weeks of retention, retention, the trabeculae thickened and consisted of a mixture of lamellar and woven bone. In conclusion, the distraction force creates a pool of undifferentiated mesenchyme-like cells with osteogenic potential and triggers capillary formation, a clear zonation can be observed during active lengthening, and new bone trabeculae begin to form between 5 and 10 days after distraction, soon become aligned with osteoblasts, and continue to grow as long as distraction force is applied. This characterization may help in any exogenous involvement with growth factors to improve bone quality.
引用
收藏
页码:1611 / 1620
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Rotation advancement of the midface by distraction osteogenesis - Discussion
    Polley, BW
    Figueroa, AA
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2003, 111 (06) : 1800 - 1803
  • [22] Denervation during mandibular distraction osteogenesis results in impaired bone formation
    Ruth Tevlin
    Michelle Griffin
    Kellen Chen
    Michael Januszyk
    Nick Guardino
    Amanda Spielman
    Shannon Walters
    Garry Evan Gold
    Charles K. F. Chan
    Geoffrey C. Gurtner
    Derrick C. Wan
    Michael T. Longaker
    Scientific Reports, 13
  • [23] Maxillary intraoral distraction osteogenesis
    Guerrero, CA
    3RD INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON CRANIAL AND FACIAL BONE DISTRACTION PROCESSES: 2001 DISTRACTION ODYSSEY, 2001, : 381 - 387
  • [24] Effect of icariin on bone formation during distraction osteogenesis in the rabbit mandible
    Wei, H.
    Zili, L.
    Yuanlu, C.
    Biao, Y.
    Cheng, L.
    Xiaoxia, W.
    Yang, L.
    Xing, W.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2011, 40 (04) : 413 - 418
  • [25] Trans-chondroid bone formation during distraction osteogenesis.
    Yasui, N
    Sato, M
    Nakase, T
    Ochi, T
    Kawahata, H
    Sugimoto, M
    Nomura, S
    Kitamura, Y
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 1997, 12 : T405 - T405
  • [26] Impaired bone formation during distraction osteogenesis in ZDF rats.
    Liu, Z
    Aronson, J
    Wahl, EC
    Liu, L
    Perrien, DS
    Kern, PA
    Fowlkes, JL
    Thrailkill, KM
    Bunn, RC
    Suva, LJ
    Skinner, RA
    Lumpkin, CK
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2003, 18 : S281 - S281
  • [27] The Effect of Heparan Sulfate Application on Bone Formation during Distraction Osteogenesis
    Gdalevitch, Marie
    Kasaai, Bahar
    Alam, Norine
    Dohin, Bruno
    Lauzier, Dominique
    Hamdy, Reggie C.
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (02):
  • [28] Distraction osteogenesis after membranous bone onlay grafting in a dog model
    Cho, BC
    Seo, MS
    Baik, BS
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2001, 59 (09) : 1025 - 1033
  • [30] Maxillary Distraction Osteogenesis in a Patient With Osteogenesis Imperfecta
    Kunkel, Ryan
    Kim, Erinn
    Tuncer, Fatma Betul
    Siddiqi, Faizi
    Gociman, Barbu
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 30 (08) : 2530 - 2532