Assessing the impact of cancer: Development of a new instrument for long-term survivors

被引:118
作者
Zebrack, Brad J.
Ganz, Patricia A.
Bernaards, Coen A.
Petersen, Laura
Abraham, Laura
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Sch Social Work, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Jonsson Comprehens Canc Ctr, Div Canc Prevent & Control Res, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Publ Hlth, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
关键词
cancer survivors; instrument development; oncology; psychometric testing; quality of life; cancer;
D O I
10.1002/pon.963
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: To develop and evaluate a new instrument that measures aspects of long-term survivorship not measured by existing tools. Methods: In qualitative interviews, 47 long-term cancer survivors (LTS) detailed ways that cancer has impacted their lives. Content analysis resulted in the creation of 325 candidate items for inclusion in a new Impact of Cancer (IOC) instrument. Following expert review, item reduction and pilot testing, 81 items were administered with other established health status and quality of life (QOL) instruments to 193 LTS of breast, prostate, colorectal cancers and lymphoma. Internal consistency reliability and validity of newly-derived scales was assessed. Results: Factor analysis of items using a priori QOL domains resulted in the derivation of ten new and specific subscales: Health Awareness, Body Changes, Health Worries, Positive and Negative Self-Evaluation, Positive and Negative Life Outlook, Social Life Interferences, Relationships, and Meaning of Cancer. Internal consistency measurements for these subscales ranged from 0.67 to 0.89. Expected associations within and among the IOC subscales and standardized measures of health status and QOL were observed, as were some unexpected findings. Conclusions: Psychometric analysis indicated that this initial version of the Impact of Cancer instrument measures distinct and relevant constructs for LTS. Future work is necessary to confirm the factor structure, responsiveness and further validation of the instrument. Copyright (c) 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 421
页数:15
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   THE EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION-FOR-RESEARCH-AND-TREATMENT-OF-CANCER QLQ-C30 - A QUALITY-OF-LIFE INSTRUMENT FOR USE IN INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL-TRIALS IN ONCOLOGY [J].
AARONSON, NK ;
AHMEDZAI, S ;
BERGMAN, B ;
BULLINGER, M ;
CULL, A ;
DUEZ, NJ ;
FILIBERTI, A ;
FLECHTNER, H ;
FLEISHMAN, SB ;
DEHAES, JCJM ;
KAASA, S ;
KLEE, M ;
OSOBA, D ;
RAZAVI, D ;
ROFE, PB ;
SCHRAUB, S ;
SNEEUW, K ;
SULLIVAN, M ;
TAKEDA, F .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (05) :365-376
[2]   PROTON NMR-STUDY OF MOLECULAR-MOTION IN SOLID CORTISONE [J].
ANDREW, ER ;
KEMPKA, M .
SOLID STATE NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 1993, 2 (05) :261-264
[3]  
[Anonymous], CANC FACTS FIG 2004
[4]   Expressions of generativity and posttraumatic growth in adult cancer survivors [J].
Bellizzi, KM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGING & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 2004, 58 (04) :267-287
[5]   INDEXES AND BOUNDARIES FOR QUANTITATIVE SIGNIFICANCE IN STATISTICAL DECISIONS [J].
BURNAND, B ;
KERNAN, WN ;
FEINSTEIN, AR .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1990, 43 (12) :1273-1284
[6]   THE FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT OF CANCER-THERAPY SCALE - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF THE GENERAL MEASURE [J].
CELLA, DF ;
TULSKY, DS ;
GRAY, G ;
SARAFIAN, B ;
LINN, E ;
BONOMI, A ;
SILBERMAN, M ;
YELLEN, SB ;
WINICOUR, P ;
BRANNON, J ;
ECKBERG, K ;
LLOYD, S ;
PURL, S ;
BLENDOWSKI, C ;
GOODMAN, M ;
BARNICLE, M ;
STEWART, I ;
MCHALE, M ;
BONOMI, P ;
KAPLAN, E ;
TAYLOR, S ;
THOMAS, CR ;
HARRIS, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1993, 11 (03) :570-579
[7]  
CELLA DF, 1998, PSYCHOONCOLOGY
[8]  
Clark E J, 1996, Cancer Pract, V4, P239
[9]   PERSONAL CHANGES, DISPOSITIONAL OPTIMISM, AND PSYCHOLOGICAL ADJUSTMENT TO BONE-MARROW TRANSPLANTATION [J].
CURBOW, B ;
SOMERFIELD, MR ;
BAKER, F ;
WINGARD, JR ;
LEGRO, MW .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 1993, 16 (05) :423-443
[10]  
Denzin N.K., 1998, Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials