The structure of trust as a reflection of culture and institutional power structure: Evidence from four East Asian societies

被引:16
作者
Zhang, Robert Jiqi [1 ]
Liu, James H. [1 ,2 ]
Milojev, Petar [3 ]
Jung, Jiin [4 ]
Wang, Sy-feng [5 ]
Xie, Tian [6 ]
Choi, Hoon-seok [7 ]
Yamaguchi, Susumu [8 ]
Morio, Hiroaki [9 ]
机构
[1] Massey Univ, Sch Psychol, Private Bag 102904, Auckland 0745, New Zealand
[2] Beijing Normal Univ, Fac Psychol, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[3] Marbella Int Univ Ctr, Marbella, Spain
[4] Claremont Grad Univ, Dept Psychol, Claremont, CA USA
[5] Fu Jen Catholic Univ, Dept Psychol, New Taipei, Taiwan
[6] Wuhan Univ, Philosophy Sch, Dept Psychol, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[7] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Dept Psychol, Seoul, South Korea
[8] Univ Tokyo, Grad Sch Humanities & Sociol, Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo, Japan
[9] Kansai Univ, Fac Informat, Osaka, Japan
关键词
China; culture; East Asia; measurement invariance; power structure; trust; POLITICAL TRUST; MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE; POST HOC; CHINESE;
D O I
10.1111/ajsp.12350
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Using the Global Trust Inventory, an integrated measure of trust toward 21 relationships and institutions, the structure of trust was explored in four East Asian societies (Mainland China, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan). The Western model, in which trust is distributed among seven factors representing different branches of society, did not generalize to these East Asian societies, perhaps due to differences in culture and institutional power structures. Instead, two unique structures of trust were identified. Mainland China had a top-down structure of trust (the China model), in which trust is hierarchically separated between the central government and subordinate implementing bodies. The other three democratic East Asian societies shared a hybrid structure of trust (the Democratic East Asian model) that has a degree of similarity to both the China model and the Western model. Having established two similar, but still distinct models, a cross-cultural comparison was made on the proportions of trust profiles generated by latent profile analysis. Mainland China had the largest proportion of people with a high propensity to trust, followed by Japan and South Korea, and Taiwan was the least trusting. Implications of the structure of trust and this alternative approach to conducting cross-cultural comparisons are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 73
页数:15
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Multiple regression approach to analyzing contingency tables: Post hoc and planned comparison procedures [J].
Beasley, TM ;
Schumacker, RE .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL EDUCATION, 1995, 64 (01) :79-93
[2]  
Behling O., 2000, Translating Questionnaires and Other Research Instruments, DOI [DOI 10.4135/9781412986373, 10 .4135/9781412986373]
[3]   Determinants of generalized trust: A cross-country comparison [J].
Bjornskov, Christian .
PUBLIC CHOICE, 2007, 130 (1-2) :1-21
[4]   Testing the Measurement Invariance of Political Trust across the Globe. A Multiple Group Confirmatory Factor Analysis [J].
Breustedt, Wiebke .
METHODS DATA ANALYSES, 2018, 12 (01) :7-45
[5]  
Brislin R.W., 1980, HDB CROSS CULTURAL P, V2, P389, DOI DOI 10.3390/HEALTHCARE6030093
[6]   Power structure and regime resilience: Contentious politics in China [J].
Cai, Yongshun .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2008, 38 :411-432
[7]   SOCIAL CAPITAL IN THE CREATION OF HUMAN-CAPITAL [J].
COLEMAN, JS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 1988, 94 :S95-S120
[8]   Second Screening Politics in the Social Media Sphere: Advancing Research on Dual Screen Use in Political Communication with Evidence from 20 Countries [J].
de Zuniga, Homero Gil ;
Liu, James H. .
JOURNAL OF BROADCASTING & ELECTRONIC MEDIA, 2017, 61 (02) :193-219
[9]   Predicting cross-national levels of social trust: Global pattern or nordic exceptionalism? [J].
Delhey, J ;
Newton, K .
EUROPEAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2005, 21 (04) :311-327
[10]   How General Is Trust in "Most People"? Solving the Radius of Trust Problem [J].
Delhey, Jan ;
Newton, Kenneth ;
Welzel, Christian .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2011, 76 (05) :786-807