Decision-Making Preferences About Secondary Germline Findings That Arise From Tumor Genomic Profiling Among Cancers

被引:11
作者
Hamilton, Jada G. [1 ,2 ]
Shuk, Elyse [1 ]
Garzon, Margaux Genoff [1 ]
Rodriguez, Vivian M. [1 ]
Westerman, Joy [1 ]
Hay, Jennifer L. [1 ,2 ]
Offit, Kenneth [1 ,2 ]
Robson, Mark E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, 641 Lexington Ave,7th Floor, New York, NY 10022 USA
[2] Weill Cornell Med Coll, New York, NY USA
关键词
INCIDENTAL FINDINGS; PATIENT AUTONOMY; ATTITUDES; RECOMMENDATIONS; RISK;
D O I
10.1200/PO.17.00182
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose In patients with advanced cancers, tumor genomic profiling (TGP) can reveal secondary germline findings (SGFs) with regard to inherited disease risks. This study examined the process by which patients with advanced cancers would decide about whether to learn these SGFs and their preferences about specific challenging decision scenarios, including whether patients should be required to receive SGFs and whether SGFs should be returned to the family after a patients death. Patients and Methods We conducted qualitative semistructured interviews with 40 patients with advanced breast, bladder, colorectal, or lung cancer who had undergone TGP. Data were collected on participants perspectives about the hypothetical decision to learn their SGFs, including their anticipated approach to the decision-making process, and their preferences about challenging decision scenarios. Data were evaluated by thematic content analysis. Results We identified themes with regard to participants preferred degree of decisional autonomy, perceived vital role of doctors, information needs, and anticipated process of deliberation. Although participants reported that this decision was ultimately their own, many wanted input from family and trusted others. Oncologists were expected to provide decision guidance and key clarifying information. Most participants stated that patients should be able to make a choice about receiving actionable SGFs, and a majority stated that SGFs should be available to family after a patients death. Conclusion These results provide insight into SGF decision-making processes of patients with advanced cancers, which can allow clinicians to provide patients with optimal decision support in this context. Patients with advanced cancers have specific information needs and decision-making preferences that educational and communication interventions should address to ensure that patients make informed choices about learning SGFs. (C) 2017 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 13
页数:13
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Deploying whole genome sequencing in clinical practice and public health: Meeting the challenge one bin at a time
    Berg, Jonathan S.
    Khoury, Muin J.
    Evans, James P.
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2011, 13 (06) : 499 - 504
  • [2] Boyatzis R., 1998, TRANSFORMING QUALITA
  • [3] Brinkman S., 2015, INTERVIEWS LEARNING, V3rd
  • [4] Recommendations for returning genomic incidental findings? We need to talk!
    Burke, Wylie
    Antommaria, Armand H. Matheny
    Bennett, Robin
    Botkin, Jeffrey
    Clayton, Ellen Wright
    Henderson, Gail E.
    Holm, Ingrid A.
    Jarvik, Gail P.
    Khoury, Muin J.
    Knoppers, Bartha Maria
    Press, Nancy A.
    Ross, Lainie Friedman
    Rothstein, Mark A.
    Saal, Howard
    Uhlmann, Wendy R.
    Wilfond, Benjamin
    Wolf, Susan M.
    Zimmern, Ron
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2013, 15 (11) : 854 - 859
  • [5] Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets (MSK-IMPACT) A Hybridization Capture-Based Next-Generation Sequencing Clinical Assay for Solid Tumor Molecular Oncology
    Cheng, Donavan T.
    Mitchell, Talia N.
    Zehir, Ahmet
    Shah, Ronak H.
    Benayed, Ryma
    Syed, Aijazuddin
    Chandramohan, Raghu
    Liu, Zhen Yu
    Won, Helen H.
    Scott, Sasinya N.
    Brannon, A. Rose
    O'Reilly, Catherine
    Sadowska, Justyna
    Casanova, Jacklyn
    Yannes, Angela
    Hechtman, Jaclyn F.
    Yao, Jinjuan
    Song, Wei
    Ross, Dara S.
    Oultache, Alifya
    Dogan, Snjezana
    Borsu, Laetitia
    Hameed, Meera
    Nafa, Khedoudja
    Arcila, Maria E.
    Ladanyi, Marc
    Berger, Michael F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2015, 17 (03) : 251 - 264
  • [6] Marital status, marital satisfaction, and support processes among women at high risk for breast cancer
    Coyne, JC
    Anderson, KK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FAMILY PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 13 (04) : 629 - 641
  • [7] Factors Influencing Men Undertaking Active Surveillance for the Management of Low-Risk Prostate Cancer
    Davison, B. Joyce
    Oliffe, John L.
    Pickles, Tom
    Mroz, Lawrence
    [J]. ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2009, 36 (01) : 89 - 96
  • [8] Combining deliberation and intuition in patient decision support
    de Vries, Marieke
    Fagerlin, Angela
    Witteman, Holly O.
    Scherer, Laura D.
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2013, 91 (02) : 154 - 160
  • [9] Denzin N.K., 2017, The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods
  • [10] Friese S., 2019, Qualitative data analysis with ATLAS.ti, V3rd ed.