The capability-enhancing role of government-driven industrial districts for new technology-based firms in South Korea

被引:6
作者
Jo, Yuri [1 ]
Chung, Won Young [2 ]
Lee, Daeho [2 ]
机构
[1] Korea Informat Soc Dev Inst, Dept ICT Strategy Res, Jincheon Gun, Chungcheongbuk, South Korea
[2] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Dept Interact Sci, Sungkyunkwan Ro 25-1, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
government-driven industrial districts; information and communications technology; meta-frontier analysis; start-ups; technical efficiency; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; AGGLOMERATION ECONOMIES; CLUSTER POLICY; LIFE-CYCLE; INNOVATION; EFFICIENCY; SPILLOVERS; GEOGRAPHY; IMPACT; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1002/app5.309
中图分类号
K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ;
摘要
Government-driven industrial clusters have attracted considerable attention from academic research as well as practical fields, mainly because of their contributions to regional economic growth and sustainable innovation performance. This article investigates the impact of government-driven industrial districts on the efficiency of new technology-based firms in information and communications technology industries. Using a meta-frontier analysis with a unique Korean start-up dataset, we find that the government's provision of industrial districts increases firm efficiency level compared with that of others outside the districts. Specifically, being located in industrial districts not only improves the efficiency of individual start-ups but also positively affects the maximum efficiency levels that firms can achieve. Our findings suggest that locational support by public administration, such as utility infrastructure, tax benefits and inter-firm informal network opportunities, enhances firms' dynamic capability to search for and combine resources to create new markets and innovations, especially for newly established technology firms.
引用
收藏
页码:306 / 321
页数:16
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   Bounding the effects of R&D: An investigation using matched establishment-firm data [J].
Adams, JD ;
Jaffe, AB .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1996, 27 (04) :700-721
[2]   Does entry size matter? The impact of the life cycle and technology on firm survival [J].
Agarwal, R ;
Audretsch, DB .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS, 2001, 49 (01) :21-43
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, SUSTAINABILITY BASEL, DOI DOI 10.3390/SU8050469
[4]   Public cluster policy and firm performance: evaluating spillover effects across industries [J].
Audretsch, David B. ;
Lehmann, Erik E. ;
Menter, Matthias ;
Seitz, Nikolaus .
ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 31 (1-2) :150-165
[5]  
Audretsch DB, 1996, AM ECON REV, V86, P630
[6]   Do firms in clusters innovate more? [J].
Baptista, R ;
Swann, P .
RESEARCH POLICY, 1998, 27 (05) :525-540
[7]  
Battese G.E., 1992, J PROD ANAL, V3, P153, DOI [10.1007/BF00158774, DOI 10.1007/BF00158774, 10.1007/bf00158774]
[8]   A metafrontier production function for estimation of technical efficiencies and technology gaps for firms operating under different technologies [J].
Battese, GE ;
Rao, DSP ;
O'Donnell, CJ .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2004, 21 (01) :91-103
[9]  
Battese GE., 2002, International Journal of Business and Economics, V1, P87, DOI DOI 10.1023/B:PR0D.0000012454.06094.29
[10]  
Beaudry C., 2003, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, V12, P325, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590290020197, DOI 10.1080/10438590290020197, 10.1080/10438590290020197]