The gender gap in the United States: Housework across racialized groups

被引:5
作者
Kolpashnikova, Kamila [1 ]
Kan, Man-Yee [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Dept Sociol, Oxford, England
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
DIVISION-OF-LABOR; WOMENS; DEPENDENCE; DIFFERENCE; COMPONENTS; EARNINGS; DISPLAY; CONTEXT;
D O I
10.4054/DemRes.2020.43.36
中图分类号
C921 [人口统计学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND Most resource-based theoretical frameworks in housework research are tested and further developed based on 'average' patterns. Consequently, in countries like the United States these frameworks rely heavily on the patterns among white women in relation to white men. As such, the resource-based factors identified by the frameworks may work to estimate the housework division of white Americans rather than any other groups, particularly racialized women and men. OBJECTIVE We test the extent to which resource-based factors such as time availability and income can account for the gender gap in housework participation among white, Black, and Latinx women and men in the United States. METHODS Using the Kitagawa-Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition method, we analyze time-use diaries from the 2003-2018 American Time Use Survey. RESULTS We find that resource-based factors account for the gender gap in housework participation only when there are substantial resource differences between the contrasted groups, the exception being when the comparison is made with Black Americans. The results also show that when any group of women is compared with Black men, resource-based factors have little explanatory power in the intergroup time gap in housework participation. CONCLUSIONS The findings imply that housework research may need to pay special attention to the diverse effects of gendering and racialization on the division of housework to avoid normalizing the theoretical frameworks that only work for the dominant white groups. CONTRIBUTION This study uses group-level decomposition analysis to compare how resource-based factors apply to the gender gap across racialized groups in the United States.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Explaining the decline in women's household labor: Individual change and cohort differences [J].
Artis, JE ;
Pavalko, EK .
JOURNAL OF MARRIAGE AND FAMILY, 2003, 65 (03) :746-761
[2]  
ATUS, 2019, AM TIM US SURV
[3]   DEPENDENCE AND INDEPENDENCE - A CROSS-NATIONAL ANALYSIS OF GENDER INEQUALITY AND GENDER ATTITUDES [J].
BAXTER, J ;
KANE, EW .
GENDER & SOCIETY, 1995, 9 (02) :193-215
[4]   WAGE DISCRIMINATION - REDUCED FORM AND STRUCTURAL ESTIMATES [J].
BLINDER, AS .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCES, 1973, 8 (04) :436-455
[5]   ECONOMIC DEPENDENCY, GENDER, AND THE DIVISION-OF-LABOR AT HOME [J].
BRINES, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 1994, 100 (03) :652-688
[6]  
Census Bureau, 2017, QUICK FACTS
[7]  
Collins P.H., 1998, Hypatia, V13, P62, DOI [10.1111/j.1527-2001.1998.tb01370.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1527-2001.1998.TB01370.X]
[8]   Doing gender in context: Household bargaining and risk of divorce in Germany and the United States [J].
Cooke, Lynn Prince .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 2006, 112 (02) :442-472
[9]  
Crenshaw Kimberle, 1991, Stanford Law Review, V43, P1241, DOI [DOI 10.2307/1229039, 10.2307/1229039]
[10]   Gender Ideology: Components, Predictors, and Consequences [J].
Davis, Shannon N. ;
Greenstein, Theodore N. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, 2009, 35 :87-105