Evaluation of Workers Accidents Through Risk Analysis

被引:10
|
作者
Nano, Giuseppe [1 ]
Derudi, Marco [1 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Milan, Dip Chim Mat & Ingn Chim G Natta, I-20131 Milan, Italy
来源
CISAP5: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SAFETY & ENVIRONMENT IN PROCESS & POWER INDUSTRY, PT 1 | 2012年 / 26卷
关键词
BARRIER;
D O I
10.3303/CET1226083
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Among the available methods for the analysis of accidents/injuries, the AEB approach (Accident Evolution and Barrier Analysis) and the 3CA-Form B method (Control Change Cause Analysis) have been used to analyze a typical accident, which often occurs, in which have been involved several workers that entered in a confined space containing toxic and/or inert gases, causing the workers death. A critical analysis of the investigated methods has been performed in order to identify the best available methodology; in particular, it was evidenced a problem of events representation with the AEB method because the large part of the causes was due to human factors, so the entire sequence of the events that led up to the accident is represented in a linear way, on a same column, by this approach making difficult to relate events that took place simultaneously. The 3CA-Form B method allows, on the other hand, a good description of the events sequence taking into account simultaneously all aspects and issues, both human and technical, that characterize it.
引用
收藏
页码:495 / 500
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Analysis of safety functions and barriers in accidents
    Harms-Ringdahl, Lars
    SAFETY SCIENCE, 2009, 47 (03) : 353 - 363
  • [2] Methodology for quantitatively monitoring the basic risk factors of accidents: A case study on manufacturing companies
    Hosseinpouri, Mahdi
    Majarshin, Vahid Mirzaei
    Sheikhmozafari, Mohammad Javad
    Ahmadi, Omran
    WORK-A JOURNAL OF PREVENTION ASSESSMENT & REHABILITATION, 2022, 72 (04): : 1397 - 1408
  • [3] Learning from the Failure of Autonomous and Intelligent Systems: Accidents, Safety, and Sociotechnical Sources of Risk
    Macrae, Carl
    RISK ANALYSIS, 2022, 42 (09) : 1999 - 2025
  • [4] Damage reduction strategies against chemical accidents by using a mitigation barrier in Korean chemical risk management
    Lyu, Byeonggil
    Lee, Kwanghee
    Kim, Taejong
    Cho, Hyungtae
    Moon, Il
    SAFETY SCIENCE, 2018, 110 : 29 - 36
  • [5] Evaluation of Environmental Risk Due to Metro System Construction in Jinan, China
    Wang, Guo-Fu
    Lyu, Hai-Min
    Shen, Jack Shuilong
    Lu, Lin-Hai
    Li, Gang
    Arulrajah, Arul
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 14 (10)
  • [6] Generalized methodology for operational risk analysis of offshore installations
    Vinnem, J. E.
    Seljelid, J.
    Haugen, S.
    Sklet, S.
    Aven, T.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART O-JOURNAL OF RISK AND RELIABILITY, 2009, 223 (O1) : 87 - 97
  • [7] Analysis of risk models using a level crossing technique
    Brill, Percy H.
    Yu, Kaiqi
    INSURANCE MATHEMATICS & ECONOMICS, 2011, 49 (03) : 298 - 309
  • [8] The Risk Analysis Screening Tool: Part I, overview
    Vaughen, Bruce K.
    Hurban, David A.
    First, Kenneth
    Ness, Al
    PROCESS SAFETY PROGRESS, 2020, 39 (02)
  • [9] Analysis of Electrical Tree Propagation through Glass Fiber Barrier
    Abderrazzaq, M. H.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON DIELECTRICS AND ELECTRICAL INSULATION, 2012, 19 (01) : 305 - 311
  • [10] A two-way membrane-integrated microfluidic device for evaluation of anti-inflammatory drug through immunohistochemical analysis and permeability assay of keratinocyte cell layers
    Sugimoto, Marika
    Takahashi-Ando, Naoko
    Sasaki, Naoki
    TALANTA OPEN, 2024, 9