Second-hand smoke levels in UK pubs and bars: do the English Public Health White Paper proposals go far enough?

被引:16
作者
Gee, IL
Watson, AFR
Carrington, J
Edwards, PR
van Tongeren, M
McElduff, P
Edwards, RE
机构
[1] Liverpool John Moores Univ, Ctr Publ Hlth, Liverpool L3 2AY, Merseyside, England
[2] Manchester Metropolitan Univ, ARIC, Dept Environm & Geog Sci, Manchester M15 6BH, Lancs, England
[3] Univ Essex, Colchester CO4 3SQ, Essex, England
[4] Univ Otago, Wellington Sch Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Publ Hlth, Wellington, New Zealand
[5] Univ Manchester, Div Epidemiol & Hlth Sci, Evidence Populat Hlth Unit, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
[6] Univ Manchester, Manchester Ctr Civil & Construct Engn, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
关键词
air quality; cross-sectional study; passive smoking; pubs and bars;
D O I
10.1093/pubmed/fdi076
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background The English Public Health White Paper proposes introducing smoke-free workplaces except in pubs and bars that do not prepare and serve food. The bar area will be non-smoking in exempted pubs. Objective To explore the likely impact of these proposals in UK pubs and bars. Methods A total of 59 pubs and bars within Greater Manchester in 2001 were chosen. Thirteen were mechanically ventilated, 12 were naturally ventilated and 34 had extractor fans; 23 provided non-smoking areas. We measured time-weighted average concentrations of respirable suspended particles (RSP), solanesol tobacco-specific particles and vapour-phase nicotine (VPN) over a 4-h sampling period on a Tuesday or Saturday night. Results Second-hand smoke (SHS) levels in smoking areas were high (mean RSP 114.5 mu g/m(3), VPN 88.2 mu g/m(3), solanesol 101.7 mu g/m(3)). There were only small (5-13 per cent) reductions in bar areas. Mean levels were lower in non-smoking areas: by 33 per cent for RSPs, 52 per cent for solanesol particles and 69 per cent for VPN. Compared with other settings (homes and other workplaces) with unrestricted smoking, mean SHS levels were high throughout all areas of the pubs regardless of ventilation strategy. Conclusion Partial measures, like those in the English Public Health White Paper, will leave bar staff in exempted pubs unprotected from the occupational hazard of SHS.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 23
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Legislation for smoke-free workplaces and health of bar workers in Ireland: before and after study [J].
Allwright, S ;
Paul, G ;
Greiner, B ;
Mullally, BJ ;
Pursell, L ;
Kelly, A ;
Bonner, B ;
D'Eath, M ;
McConnell, B ;
McLaughlin, JP ;
O'Donovan, D ;
O'Kane, E ;
Perry, IJ .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 331 (7525) :1117-+
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, SMOK KILLS WHIT PAP
[3]  
[Anonymous], QUANTITATIVE SURVEY
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, GOING SMOK FREE MED
[5]   The effects of smoking status and ventilation on environmental tobacco smoke concentrations in public areas of UK pubs and bars [J].
Carrington, J ;
Watson, AFR ;
Gee, IL .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2003, 37 (23) :3255-3266
[6]   A study of Environmental Tobacco Smoke in South Australian pubs, clubs and cafes [J].
Cenko, C ;
Pisaniello, D ;
Esterman, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH RESEARCH, 2004, 14 (01) :3-11
[7]  
*CHART GROUP, 2003, PUBL PLAC CHART SMOK
[8]  
*DEPH HLTH, 2004, CHOOS HLTH MAK HLTH
[9]   The whole truth and nothing but the truth? The research that Philip Morris did not want you to see [J].
Diethelm, PA ;
Rielle, JC ;
McKee, M .
LANCET, 2005, 366 (9479) :86-92
[10]   Tobacco industry efforts to present ventilation as an alternative to smoke-free environments in North America [J].
Drope, J ;
Bialous, SA ;
Glantz, SA .
TOBACCO CONTROL, 2004, 13 :41-47