The negative impacts of the global economic downturn on funding decentralised energy in the UK

被引:9
作者
Finney, Karen N. [1 ]
Sharifi, Vida N. [1 ]
Swithenbank, Jim [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Dept Chem & Biol Engn, SUWIC, Sheffield S1 3JD, S Yorkshire, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Decentralised energy technologies; Funding opportunities; Economic downturn; DOMESTIC MICRO-GENERATION; TECHNOLOGIES; PERSPECTIVE; INNOVATION; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2012.08.010
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Over the years, a number of governmental policies have been developed in the UK that offer grants for the installation of distributed energy technologies or financial rewards per unit of electricity/heat generated from renewable and sustainable sources. The current economic climate however has meant that budget cuts have affected almost all government departments; consequently such policies have been adversely impacted. The alterations/modifications to many schemes have resulted in either a reduction in the funding available through these, changes to the eligibility of certain technologies or scales of generation or policy cancellations. The programmes affected include the Feed-In Tariff Scheme, Renewable Heat Incentive and Low Carbon Buildings Programme, among others. The adjustments for these are detailed herein, followed by the impacts these have had on the deployment rates of decentralised energy, especially microgeneration. Since costs are often one of the most significant factors constraining deployment of these technologies, reductions in funding opportunities have made these less financially-viable. Whilst there are still applications for funding under the available schemes, there has been considerably reduced levels of requests for financial support, thus future deployment rates will most likely be negatively affected. The prospects of these technologies in this context are then considered. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:290 / 300
页数:11
相关论文
共 39 条
[31]   Interim monitoring of cost dynamics for publicly supported energy technologies [J].
Nemet, Gregory F. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (03) :825-835
[32]  
Ofgem, 2011, ANN REP SECR STAT EN
[33]   Technological innovation in the energy sector: R&D, deployment, and learning-by-doing [J].
Sagar, Ambuj D. ;
van der Zwaan, Bob .
ENERGY POLICY, 2006, 34 (17) :2601-2608
[34]   Can premium tariffs for micro-generation and small scale renewable heat help the fuel poor, and if so, how? Case studies of innovative finance for community energy schemes in the UK [J].
Saunders, R. W. ;
Gross, R. J. K. ;
Wade, J. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 42 :78-88
[35]  
SunGift Solar Ltd, 2010, CLOS LOW CARB BUILD
[36]   Basic concepts for designing renewable electricity support aiming at a full-scale transition by 2050 [J].
Verbruggen, Aviel ;
Lauber, Volkmar .
ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (12) :5732-5743
[37]  
Watson J, 2008, ENERG POLICY, V36, P3095, DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.04.028
[38]   The deployment of decentralised energy systems as part of the housing growth programme in the UK [J].
Williams, Jo .
ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (12) :7604-7613
[39]   Regulatory frameworks for decentralised energy [J].
Woodman, Bridget ;
Baker, Philip .
ENERGY POLICY, 2008, 36 (12) :4527-4531