How and when matter: Exploring the interaction effects of high-performance work systems, employee participation, and human capital on organizational innovation

被引:60
作者
Zhou, Yu [1 ]
Fan, Xueqing [1 ]
Son, Jooyeon [2 ]
机构
[1] Renmin Univ China, Sch Business, Dept Org & Human Resources, 59 Zhongguancun St, Beijing 100872, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Melbourne, Fac Business & Econ, Dept Management & Mkt, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
China; employee participation; high-performance work systems; human capital; organizational innovation; HUMAN-RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; HIGH-INVOLVEMENT MANAGEMENT; COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; FIRM PERFORMANCE; CREATIVITY; KNOWLEDGE; COMMITMENT; DEMOCRACY; HRM; IMPLEMENTATION;
D O I
10.1002/hrm.21950
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Existing research on the relationship between high-performance work systems (HPWS) and organizational innovation has paid insufficient attention to the boundary effects of employee participation and human capital. Bridging the human resource management (HRM) and employment relations literature, this study contributes to the contingency view of HRM and China-specific research by investigating how human capital and employee participation, direct voice mechanism, and corporate governance participation jointly moderate the relationship between HPWS and organizational innovation. We test our three-way interaction model using a sample of 108 firms and 1,250 employees in China. The results suggest that HPWS are positively associated with organizational innovation when employees with relatively less human capital are coupled with more direct voice mechanism or less corporate governance participation. In contrast, HPWS are negatively related to organizational innovation when employees possessing greater human capital are coupled with more direct voice mechanism. The theoretical and managerial implications and future research directions are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 268
页数:16
相关论文
共 100 条
[1]   Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study [J].
Ahuja, G .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2000, 45 (03) :425-455
[2]  
Aiken L. S., 1991, Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions, DOI 10.2307/2348581
[3]   Innovation and Creativity in Organizations: A State-of-the-Science Review, Prospective Commentary, and Guiding Framework [J].
Anderson, Neil ;
Potocnik, Kristina ;
Zhou, Jing .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2014, 40 (05) :1297-1333
[4]   When the fit between HR practices backfires: Exploring the interaction effects between rewards for and appraisal of knowledge behaviours on innovation [J].
Andreeva, Tatiana ;
Vanhala, Mika ;
Sergeeva, Anastasia ;
Ritala, Paavo ;
Kianto, Aino .
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2017, 27 (02) :209-227
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2015, 1 FIND 6 EUR WORK CO
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2016, INT J HUMAN RESOURCE
[7]   Shopfloor innovation: Facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas [J].
Axtell, CM ;
Holman, DJ ;
Unsworth, KL ;
Wall, TD ;
Waterson, PE .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 73 :265-285
[8]   PUTTING CREATIVITY TO WORK: THE IMPLEMENTATION OF CREATIVE IDEAS IN ORGANIZATIONS [J].
Baer, Markus .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2012, 55 (05) :1102-1119
[9]   Pro-Social or Pro-Management? A Critique of the Conception of Employee Voice as a Pro-Social Behaviour within Organizational Behaviour [J].
Barry, Michael ;
Wilkinson, Adrian .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, 2016, 54 (02) :261-284
[10]   When Voice Matters: A Multilevel Review of the Impact of Voice in Organizations [J].
Bashshur, Michael R. ;
Oc, Burak .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2015, 41 (05) :1530-1554