Research on technology innovation risk evaluation of high-tech enterprises based on fuzzy evaluation

被引：13

作者：

Junshu, Du ^{[1
]}

Shaofeng, Peng ^{[2
,3
]}

Jisheng, Peng ^{[4
]}

机构：

[1] Changzhou Coll Informat Technol, Sch Modern Serv Ind, Changzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China

[2] Hunan Normal Univ, Sch Publ Adm, 36 Lushan Rd, Changsha 410081, Peoples R China

[3] Hunan Normal Univ, Inst Social Governance & Social Policies, 36 Lushan Rd, Changsha 410081, Peoples R China

[4] Nanjing Univ, Business Sch, Nanjing, Peoples R China

来源：

JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS | 2020年 / 38卷 / 06期

基金：

中国博士后科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;

关键词：

Fuzzy evaluation; technology innovation; risk evaluation; high-tech enterprises; PRODUCT INNOVATION; PERFORMANCE;

D O I：

10.3233/JIFS-179758

中图分类号：

TP18 [人工智能理论];

学科分类号：

081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;

摘要：

While high-tech enterprises have achieved high returns through technological innovation, they also face high risks. This study builds a technology innovation risk evaluation system for high-tech enterprises from eight dimensions: technology risk, capital risk, patent risk, talent risk, management risk, policy risk, industrial risk, and market risk. Based on the subjective and fuzzy characteristics of the evaluation indicators, a risk evaluation model for technological innovation based on fuzzy evaluation was established, and an empirical study was conducted with a technological innovation project of a petrochemical company in Shanghai. The research results show that the high-tech enterprises' technology innovation risk evaluation model constructed in this study has high accuracy for the quantification of technological innovation risk, and the technology innovation risk evaluation model is highly practical, which provides a reasonable basis for risk management decisions in the process of a high-tech company technology innovation.

引用

页码：6805 / 6814

页数：10

共 21 条

[1] Alfaro Garca V. G., 2015, Global Journal of Business Research, V9, P53
[2] Belas J, 2018, TRANSFORM BUS ECON, V17, P55
[3] Technological innovation systems in contexts: Conceptualizing contextual structures and interaction dynamics
Bergek, Anna
Hekkert, Marko
Jacobsson, Staffan
Markard, Jochen
Sanden, Bjoern
Truffer, Bernhard
[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND SOCIETAL TRANSITIONS, 2015, 16 : 51 - 64
[4] RISK CONCEPTION AND RISK MANAGEMENT IN CORPORATE INNOVATION: LESSONS FROM TWO SWEDISH CASES
Berglund, Henrik
[J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2007, 11 (04) : 497 - 513
[5] Bhupendra K, 2019, J POWER TECHNOL, V99, P49
[6] Risk identification, evaluation and response of low-carbon technological innovation under the global value chain: A case of the Chinese manufacturing industry
Bi Kexin
Huang Ping
Ye Hui
[J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2015, 100 : 238 - 248
[7] Corporate bond ratings, underwriters' reputation and cost of bonds
Chen, Chao
Zhao, Yang
Zhao, Yu
[J]. ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2019, 26 (1-2) : 1 - 16
[8] Risk analysis models and risk degree determination in new product development: A case study
Choi, Hoo-Gon
Ahn, Jungon
[J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2010, 27 (1-2) : 110 - 124
[9] Innovation, profitability and growth in medium and high-tech manufacturing industries: evidence from Italy
Cozza, Claudio
Malerba, Franco
Mancusi, Maria Luisa
Perani, Giulio
Vezzulli, Andrea
[J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2012, 44 (15) : 1963 - 1976
[10] Green Product Innovation in Manufacturing Firms: A Sustainability-Oriented Dynamic Capability Perspective
Dangelico, Rosa Maria
Pujari, Devashish
Pontrandolfo, Pierpaolo
[J]. BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 26 (04) : 490 - 506

← 1 2 3 →