Rupatadine oral solution in children with persistent allergic rhinitis: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

被引:25
作者
Potter, Paul [1 ]
Maspero, Jorge F. [2 ]
Vermeulen, Jan [3 ]
Barkai, Laszlo [4 ]
Nemeth, Ildiko [5 ]
Baillieau, Rene A. [6 ]
Garde, Jesus M. [7 ]
Giralt, Josep [8 ]
Domenech, Alejandro [8 ]
Izquierdo, Inaki [8 ]
Nieto, Antonio [9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cape Town, Dept Med, Allergy Diagnost & Clin Res Unit, ZA-7925 Cape Town, South Africa
[2] Fdn CIDEA, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[3] Parow Res, Cape Town, South Africa
[4] BAZ Megyei Korhaz Gyermekegeszsegugyi Kozpont, Miskolc, Hungary
[5] Szent Erzsebet Korhaz Nonprofit Kozhasznu Kft, Jaszbereny, Hungary
[6] Ctr Alergia, Mar Del Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[7] Hosp Gen Univ Elche, Alicante, Spain
[8] J Uriach & Co, Clin Dev & Med Advice, Barcelona, Spain
[9] Hosp Materno Infantil La Fe, Valencia, Spain
关键词
allergic rhinitis; persistent; children; antihistamine; rupatadine; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; 10; MG; EFFICACY; SAFETY; LEVOCETIRIZINE; RHINOCONJUNCTIVITIS; CETIRIZINE; CHILDHOOD; ASTHMA; ANTIHISTAMINES;
D O I
10.1111/pai.12036
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background Allergic rhinitis (AR) is one of the most common chronic diseases in childhood. No large, multicentre clinical trials in children with persistent allergic rhinitis (PER) have previously been performed. Rupatadine, a newer second-generation antihistamine, effective and safe in adults, is a promising treatment for children with AR. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new rupatadine oral solution in children aged 611yr with PER. Methods A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was carried out worldwide. Patients between 6 and 11yr with a diagnosis of PER according to ARIA criteria were randomized to receive either rupatadine oral solution (1mg/ml) or placebo over 6wk. The primary efficacy end-point was the change from baseline of the total nasal symptoms score (T4SS) after 4wk of treatment. Results A total of 360 patients were randomized to rupatadine (n=180) or placebo (n=180) treatment. Rupatadine showed statistically significant differences vs. placebo for the T4SS reduction both at 4 (2.5 +/- 1.9 vs. 3.1 +/- 2.1; p=0.018) and 6wk (2.7 +/- 1.9 vs. 3.3 +/- 2.1; p=0.048). Rupatadine also showed a statistically better improvement in the children's quality of life compared with placebo. Adverse reactions were rare and non-serious in both treatment groups. No QTc or laboratory test abnormalities were reported. Conclusions Rupatadine oral solution (1mg/ml) was significantly more effective than placebo in reducing nasal symptoms at 4 and 6wk and was well tolerated overall. This is the first large clinical report on the efficacy of an H1 receptor antagonist in children with PER in both symptoms and quality of life.
引用
收藏
页码:144 / 150
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Morning and evening efficacy evaluation of rupatadine ( 10 and 20 mg), compared with cetirizine 10 mg in perennial allergic rhinitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
    Marmouz, Farid
    Giralt, Josep
    Izquierdo, Inaki
    JOURNAL OF ASTHMA AND ALLERGY, 2011, 4 : 27 - 35
  • [22] Montelukast for treating seasonal allergic rhinitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial performed in the spring
    Philip, G
    Malmstrom, K
    Hampel, FC
    Weinstein, SF
    LaForce, CF
    Ratner, PH
    Malice, MP
    Reiss, TF
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 2002, 32 (07) : 1020 - 1028
  • [23] Double-blind, placebo-controlled study with sublingual immunotherapy in children with seasonal allergic rhinitis to grass pollen
    Wüthrich, B
    Bucher, C
    Jörg, W
    Bircher, A
    Eng, P
    Schneider, Y
    Schnyder, F
    Eigenmann, P
    Senti, G
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIONAL ALLERGOLOGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2003, 13 (03) : 145 - 148
  • [24] Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of the Efficacy and Safety of Azelastine Hydrochloride in Children with Perennial Allergic Rhinitis
    Bousquet, Jean
    Klimek, Ludger
    Kuhl, Hans-Christian
    Nguyen, Duc Tung
    Ramalingam, Rajesh Kumar
    Canonica, G. Walter
    Berger, William E.
    INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2024,
  • [25] Grass pollen sublingual immunotherapy: A double-blind, placebo-controlled study in elderly patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis
    Bozek, Andrzej
    Kolodziejczyk, Krzysztof
    Warkocka-Szoltysek, Barbara
    Jarzab, Jerzy
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY & ALLERGY, 2014, 28 (05) : 423 - 427
  • [26] Rupatadine in the treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled multicentre study
    Gimenez-Arnau, A.
    Pujol, R. M.
    Ianosi, S.
    Kaszuba, A.
    Malbran, A.
    Poop, G.
    Donado, E.
    Perez, I.
    Izquierdo, I.
    Arnaiz, E.
    ALLERGY, 2007, 62 (05) : 539 - 546
  • [27] Efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy in children with asthma and rhinitis:: A double-blind, placebo-controlled study
    Bahçeciler, NN
    Isik, U
    Barlan, IB
    Basaran, MM
    PEDIATRIC PULMONOLOGY, 2001, 32 (01) : 49 - 55
  • [28] Quality of life assessment in patients with moderate to severe allergic rhinitis treated with montelukast and/or intranasal steroids: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
    Goh, B-S
    Ismail, M. I. M.
    Husain, S.
    JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2014, 128 (03) : 242 - 248
  • [29] Allergic Rhinitis Improvement in Asthmatic Children After Using Acaricidal Bait: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Cross-Placebo Study
    Chen, Ming
    Wu, Yufen
    Yuan, Shuhua
    Tang, Mingyu
    Zhang, Lei
    Chen, Jiande
    Li, Luanluan
    Wu, Jinhong
    Zhang, Jing
    Yin, Yong
    FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS, 2021, 9
  • [30] Efficacy of Nasal Cellulose Powder in the Symptomatic Treatment of Allergic Rhinitis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
    Manuyakorn, Wiparat
    Klangkalya, Natchanun
    Kamchaisatian, Wasu
    Benjaponpitak, Suwat
    Sasisakulporn, Cherapat
    Jotikasthira, Wanlapa
    ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY RESEARCH, 2017, 9 (05) : 446 - 452