Techno-economic analysis of biomass to transportation fuels and electricity via fast pyrolysis and hydroprocessing

被引:154
作者
Brown, Tristan R. [1 ]
Thilakaratne, Rajeeva [2 ]
Brown, Robert C. [1 ,2 ]
Hu, Guiping [3 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Bioecon Inst, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[2] Iowa State Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[3] Iowa State Univ, Ames, IA 50011 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Fast pyrolysis; Hydroprocessing; Catalytic pyrolysis; Techno-economic analysis; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ADVANCED BIOFUEL; BIO-OIL; ETHANOL; PRODUCE; REFINERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.fuel.2012.11.029
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
A previous Iowa State University (ISU) analysis published in 2010 investigated the technical and economic feasibility of the fast pyrolysis and hydroprocessing of biomass, and concluded that the pathway could produce cellulosic biofuels for a minimum fuel selling price (MFSP) of $2.11/gal. The 2010 ISU study was largely theoretical in that no commercial-scale fast pyrolysis facilities were being constructed at the time of publication. The present analysis expands upon the 2010 ISU study by performing an updated techno-economic analysis of the fast pyrolysis and hydroprocessing pathway. Recent advances in pathway technology and commercialization and new parameters suggested by the recent literature are accounted for. The MFSP for a 2000 MTPD facility employing fast pyrolysis and hydroprocessing to convert corn stover to gasoline and diesel fuel is calculated to quantify the economic feasibility of the pathway. The present analysis determines the MFSP of gasoline and diesel fuel produced via fast pyrolysis and hydroprocessing to be $2.57/gal. This result indicates that the pathway could be competitive with petroleum, although not as competitive as suggested by the 2010 ISU study. The present analysis also demonstrates the sensitivity of the result to process assumptions. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:463 / 469
页数:7
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Ahmad Murni M., 2010, American Journal of Applied Sciences, V7, P746, DOI 10.3844/ajassp.2010.746.755
[2]   Techno-economic comparison of biomass-to-transportation fuels via pyrolysis, gasification, and biochemical pathways [J].
Anex, Robert P. ;
Aden, Andy ;
Kazi, Feroz Kabir ;
Fortman, Joshua ;
Swanson, Ryan M. ;
Wright, Mark M. ;
Satrio, Justinus A. ;
Brown, Robert C. ;
Daugaard, Daren E. ;
Platon, Alex ;
Kothandaraman, Geetha ;
Hsu, David D. ;
Dutta, Abhijit .
FUEL, 2010, 89 :S29-S35
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Fed. Regist, V75, P14790
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2011, EMTS DATA
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2012, The Wall Street Journal
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2011, CHEM ENG-NEW YORK, V118, P63
[7]   Review of fast pyrolysis of biomass and product upgrading [J].
Bridgwater, A. V. .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2012, 38 :68-94
[8]   Techno-economic analysis of biobased chemicals production via integrated catalytic processing [J].
Brown, Tristan R. ;
Zhang, Yanan ;
Hu, Guiping ;
Brown, Robert C. .
BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2012, 6 (01) :73-87
[9]   Estimating profitability of two biochar production scenarios: slow pyrolysis vs fast pyrolysis [J].
Brown, Tristan R. ;
Wright, Mark M. ;
Brown, Robert C. .
BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2011, 5 (01) :54-68
[10]  
C.o.E.a.E.I.o.I.B. Production N.R. Council, 2011, REN FUEL STAND POT E