Testing a peer support intervention for people with type 2 diabetes: a pilot for a randomised controlled trial

被引:34
作者
Simmons, David [3 ]
Cohn, Simon [1 ]
Bunn, Christopher
Birch, Kym
Donald, Sarah
Paddison, Charlotte [1 ]
Ward, Candice
Robins, Peter
Prevost, A. Toby [2 ]
Graffy, Jonathan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Primary Care Unit, Cambridge, England
[2] Kings Coll London, Dept Primary Care & Publ Hlth Sci, London WC2R 2LS, England
[3] Cambridge Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Inst Metab Sci, Adden Brookes Hosp, Wolfson Diabet & Endocrinol Clin, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, England
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Diabetes; Peer support; Complex intervention; Self-management; IMPROVE GLYCEMIC CONTROL; PSYCHOLOGICAL INTERVENTIONS; SELF-MANAGEMENT; PRIMARY-CARE; BARRIERS; METAANALYSIS; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2296-14-5
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: People with Type 2 diabetes face various psycho-social, self-management and clinical care issues and evidence is mixed whether support from others with diabetes, 'peer support', can help. We now describe a 2 month pilot study of different peer support interventions. Methods: The intervention was informed by formative evaluation using semi-structured interviews with health professionals, community support groups and observation of diabetes education and support groups. Invitations to participate were mailed from 4 general practices and included a survey of barriers to care. Participants were randomized by practice to receive individual, group, combined (both individual and group) or no peer support. Evaluation included ethnographic observation, semi-structured interviews and questionnaires at baseline and post-intervention. Results: Of 1,101 invited, 15% expressed an interest in participating in the pilot. Sufficient numbers volunteered to become peer supporters, although 50% of these (8/16) withdrew. Those in the pilot were similar to other patients, but were less likely to feel they knew enough about diabetes (60.8% vs 44.6% p = 0.035) and less likely to be happy with the diabetes education/care to date (75.4% vs 55.4% p = 0.013). Key issues identified were the need to recruit peer supporters directly rather than through clinicians, to address participant diabetes educational needs early and the potential for group sessions to have lower participation rates than 1: 1 sessions. Conclusions: Recruitment to a full trial of peer support within the existing study design is feasible with some amendments. Attendance emerged as a key issue needing close monitoring and additional intervention during the trial.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, MOD STAND SERV MOD N
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, DEV EVALUATING COMPL
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Global guideline for Type 2 diabetes
[4]  
Baksi A, 2008, DIABETIC MED, V25, P9
[5]  
Baksi A, 2005, PRACT DIAB INT, V22, P4
[6]   Response to comment on: American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes-2011 (vol 34, pg e54, 2011) [J].
Wysham, C. H. ;
Kirkman, M. S. .
DIABETES CARE, 2011, 34 (08) :1887-1887
[7]   Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness [J].
Bodenheimer, T ;
Wagner, EH ;
Grumbach, K .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 288 (14) :1775-1779
[8]   Peers for Progress: promoting peer support for health around the world [J].
Boothroyd, Renee I. ;
Fisher, Edwin B. .
FAMILY PRACTICE, 2010, 27 :I62-I68
[9]   Study protocol - Telecare motivational interviewing for diabetes patient education and support: a randomised controlled trial based in primary care comparing nurse and peer supporter delivery [J].
Dale, Jeremy ;
Caramlau, Isabela ;
Docherty, Andrea ;
Sturt, Jackie ;
Hearnshaw, Hilary .
TRIALS, 2007, 8 (1)
[10]  
Funnell MM, 2007, 2 WHO U MICH