Considerations for classroom seating arrangements and the role of teacher characteristics and beliefs

被引:47
作者
Gremmen, Mariola C. [1 ,2 ]
van den Berg, Yvonne H. M. [1 ]
Segers, Eliane [1 ]
Cillessen, Antonius H. N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Inst Behav Sci, Montessorilaan 3, NL-6500 HE Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Dept Sociol, Grote Rozenstr 31, NL-9712 TG Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
Classroom management; Classroom seating arrangements; Teacher considerations; Teacher beliefs; PEER RELATIONS; INTERGROUP CONTACT; FRAMEWORK; SCHOOL;
D O I
10.1007/s11218-016-9353-y
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
As a part of classroom management, teachers face the question of how and where to seat their students. However, it is far from clear what considerations teachers have when making seating arrangements. Therefore, in this study seating arrangement considerations from 50 teachers in grades 4-6 of elementary school were assessed. In Phase 1, teachers were interviewed about their goals and considerations for classroom seating arrangements. Teachers mentioned between 2 and 19 reasons for placing students at specific places in the classroom, with mostly academic considerations. They mainly preferred arrangements in small groups to promote student cooperation. In Phase 2, teachers completed a questionnaire about seating arrangements. This allowed us to examine individual differences between teachers related to gender, years of experience, and beliefs, and the concurrence between the interview and questionnaire data. Teachers reported multiple and various considerations for seating arrangements. Correlations with their general student-oriented or subject-oriented beliefs and personal characteristics were low. The concurrence between measurement methods also was low. The discussion focused on teacher awareness of classroom seating arrangements as an important part of classroom management and a tool for prevention and intervention.
引用
收藏
页码:749 / 774
页数:26
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, HDB CLASSROOM MANAGE
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1954, NATURE PREJUDICE
[3]  
[Anonymous], ADVENTIST ED
[4]  
[Anonymous], HDB EXPT EXISTENTIAL
[5]  
Baines E., 2003, International Journal of Educational Research, V39, P9, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00071-5, DOI 10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00071-5]
[6]   Classroom environment influences on aggression, peer relations, and academic focus [J].
Barth, JM ;
Dunlap, SI ;
Dane, H ;
Lochman, JE ;
Wells, KC .
JOURNAL OF SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 42 (02) :115-133
[7]  
Borg M., 2001, ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEA, V55, P186, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/55.2.186, DOI 10.1093/ELT/55.2.186]
[8]   Classroom Peer Effects and Student Achievement [J].
Burke, Mary A. ;
Sass, Tim R. .
JOURNAL OF LABOR ECONOMICS, 2013, 31 (01) :51-82
[9]  
Creswell J. W., 2003, HDB MIXED METHODS SO, P209, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781506335193
[10]   Promoting Adaptive Expertise: A Conceptual Framework for Special Educator Preparation [J].
De Arment, Serra T. ;
Reed, Evelyn ;
Wetzel, Angela P. .
TEACHER EDUCATION AND SPECIAL EDUCATION, 2013, 36 (03) :217-230