Exclusion of root competition increases competitive abilities of subordinate plant species through root-shoot interactions

被引:22
|
作者
Mariotte, P. [1 ,2 ]
Buttler, A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Johnson, D. [4 ]
Thebault, A. [1 ]
Vandenberghe, C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Ecole Polytech Fed Lausanne, Sch Architecture Civil & Environm Engn ENAC, Lab Ecol Syst ECOS, Stn 2, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
[2] Swiss Fed Inst Forest Snow & Landscape Res WSL, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
[3] Univ Franche Comte, UFR Sci & Tech, UMR CNRS 6249, Lab Chronoenvironm, F-25030 Besancon, France
[4] Univ Aberdeen, Inst Biol & Environm Sci, Aberdeen AB24 3UU, Scotland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
Asymmetry; Competitive effect and response; Competitive hierarchy; Plant-plant interactions; Root competition; Subordinate species; ASYMMETRIC COMPETITION; DIVERSITY; COMMUNITY; GRASSLAND; PRODUCTIVITY; HIERARCHIES; MECHANISMS; PATTERNS; DOMINANT;
D O I
10.1111/j.1654-1103.2012.01432.x
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Questions What is the importance of root competition in the competitive abilities of dominant and subordinate species? Location Pair-wise greenhouse experiment based on field data from a semi-natural grassland community in the Swiss Jura Mountains (Col du Marchairuz, Switzerland). Methods The dominance hierarchy from a mountain wood-pasture ecosystem was used to identify five dominant and three subordinate species. These species were grown in pair-wise combinations under full competition and in the absence of root competition, enabling us to calculate indices of competitive effect and response and overall asymmetry. Results Root competition exclusion led to a decrease in the competitive abilities of dominants, whereas subordinates became overall more competitive. Total asymmetry also decreased, indicating reduced competition between the two species groups. The exclusion of root competition increased both below-ground and above-ground growth of subordinates, whereas for dominants below-ground growth was unaffected and above-ground growth decreased. Conclusions We demonstrate that root competition through rootshoot competition interactions is an important factor driving the competitive dominance of species and the structure of grazed grassland communities. Locally, reduction of root competition involved in gap creation might explain persistence of subordinate species within the vegetation community and lead to an aggregated spatial pattern of subordinates involved in species co-existence in grasslands.
引用
收藏
页码:1148 / 1158
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ROOT-SHOOT INTERACTIONS AND PLANT LIFE FORMS
    SCHULZE, ED
    NETHERLANDS JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1983, 31 (04): : 291 - 303
  • [2] ROOT-SHOOT INTERACTIONS IN PEACH - FUNCTION OF ROOT
    RICHARDS, D
    ROWE, RN
    ANNALS OF BOTANY, 1977, 41 (176) : 1211 - 1216
  • [3] Root-shoot interactions in mineral nutrition
    Jeschke, WD
    Hartung, W
    PLANT AND SOIL, 2000, 226 (01) : 57 - 69
  • [4] Root-shoot interactions in mineral nutrition
    W. Dieter Jeschke
    Wolfram Hartung
    Plant and Soil, 2000, 226 : 57 - 69
  • [5] Interactions between root and shoot competition and plant traits
    Cahill, James F.
    Lamb, Eric G.
    HORTSCIENCE, 2007, 42 (05) : 1110 - 1112
  • [6] Interactions between root and shoot competition and plant traits
    Cahill, J. F.
    HORTSCIENCE, 2006, 41 (04) : 921 - 921
  • [8] Nitrogen Fertilization Increases Root Growth and Coordinates the Root-Shoot Relationship in Cotton
    Chen, Jing
    Liu, Liantao
    Wang, Zhanbiao
    Zhang, Yongjiang
    Sun, Hongchun
    Song, Shijia
    Bai, Zhiying
    Lu, Zhanyuan
    Li, Cundong
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2020, 11
  • [9] Long distance root-shoot signalling in plant-insect community interactions
    Soler, Roxina
    Erb, Matthias
    Kaplan, Ian
    TRENDS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2013, 18 (03) : 149 - 156
  • [10] Root-shoot relationships in plant adaptation to nitrogen deficiency
    Mardanov, A
    Samedovam, A
    Shirvany, T
    ROOT DEMOGRAPHICS AND THEIR EFFICIENCIES IN SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE, GRASSLANDS AND FOREST ECOSYSTEMS, 1998, 82 : 147 - 154