The Use of a Laparoscopic Bulldog Clamp to Control the Dorsal Vein Complex During Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Novel Technique

被引:12
|
作者
Tufek, Ilter [1 ]
Argun, Burak [2 ]
Atug, Fatih [3 ]
Keskin, Mehmet Selcuk [1 ]
Obek, Can [4 ]
Coskuner, Enis Rauf [1 ]
Kural, Ali Riza [2 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Acibadem Univ, Dept Urol, Sch Med, TR-34457 Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Acibadem Maslak Hosp, Dept Urol, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Istanbul Bilim Univ, Dept Urol, Sch Med, Istanbul, Turkey
[4] Istanbul Univ, Dept Urol, Cerrahpasa Med Sch, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS; VATTIKUTI-INSTITUTE PROSTATECTOMY; LIGATION; SUTURE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1089/end.2012.0013
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: To describe a novel technique to control dorsal vein complex (DVC) during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Patients and Methods: We have been using a laparoscopic bulldog clamp to control DVC before apical dissection and urethral division. Data of 50 patients who underwent DVC control with laparoscopic bulldog clamp (group 1) were retrospectively compared with 50 consecutive patients in whom DVC was controlled with suture ligation (group 2). In the bulldog and suture groups, 30 and 31 patients underwent concomitant bilateral extended pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND), respectively. Operative and anastomosis time, estimated blood loss (EBL), apical surgical margin positivity, and early continence rates were evaluated. Results: Patients in the bulldog group had significantly shorter operative time compared with patients in the suture group (146.8 vs 178.4 min, P=0.0005). Anastomosis time was significantly shorter in the bulldog group (12.3 vs 15.5min, P=0.002). There was no difference in EBL between the groups (185 vs 184.2 mL). Immediate, postoperative first and third month continence rates were 62% vs 44%, 74% vs 60%, 90% vs 74% in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Although continence rates were better in favor of the bulldog group at each evaluation period, the difference did not reach statistical difference. None of the patients in both groups had apical surgical margin positivity. Conclusions: The use of a laparoscopic bulldog clamp to control DVC was associated with shorter operation and anastomosis time and a trend toward quicker recovery of continence. This technique provides clear vision during apical dissection and urethral division while potentially minimizing the external sphincteric trauma. Prospective randomized trials are needed for better evaluation of this technique.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 33
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] What factors affect the operative time of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy?
    Uchida, Takato
    Higure, Taro
    Kawakami, Masayoshi
    Nakano, Mayura
    Nakajima, Nobuyuki
    Kim, Hakushi
    Nitta, Masahiro
    Hasegawa, Masanori
    Kawamura, Yoshiaki
    Shoji, Sunao
    Miyajima, Akira
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2021, 35 (08): : 4436 - 4443
  • [32] Adequacy of lymphadenectomy among men undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Kane, Christopher J.
    Cowan, Janet E.
    Carroll, Peter R.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 105 (01) : 88 - 92
  • [33] Intraoperative Registered Transrectal Ultrasound Guidance for Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
    Mohareri, Omid
    Ischia, Joseph
    Black, Peter C.
    Schneider, Caitlin
    Lobo, Julio
    Goldenberg, Larry
    Salcudean, Septimiu E.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (01) : 302 - 312
  • [34] Standard vs delayed ligature of the dorsal vascular complex during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: results from a randomized controlled trial
    Alessandro Antonelli
    Carlotta Palumbo
    Alessandro Veccia
    Simona Fisogni
    Stefania Zamboni
    Maria Furlan
    Simone Francavilla
    Marco Lattarulo
    Enrico De Marzo
    Giuseppe Mirabella
    Angelo Peroni
    Claudio Simeone
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2019, 13 : 253 - 260
  • [35] Retropubic, Laparoscopic, and Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Cumulative Analysis of Comparative Studies
    Ficarra, Vincenzo
    Novara, Giacomo
    Artibani, Walter
    Cestari, Andrea
    Galfano, Antonio
    Graefen, Markus
    Guazzoni, Giorgio
    Guillonneau, Bertrand
    Menon, Mani
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Patel, Vipul
    Rassweiler, Jens
    Van Poppel, Hendrik
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2009, 55 (05) : 1037 - 1063
  • [36] Retro-apical transection of the urethra during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in an Asian population
    Ou, Yen-Chuan
    Hung, Siu-Wan
    Wang, John
    Yang, Chun-Kuang
    Cheng, Chen-Li
    Tewari, Ashutosh K.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 110 (2B) : E57 - E63
  • [37] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy has lower biochemical recurrence than laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lee, Seon Heui
    Seo, Hyun Ju
    Lee, Na Rae
    Son, Soo Kyung
    Kim, Dae Keun
    Rha, Koon Ho
    INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2017, 58 (03) : 152 - 163
  • [38] The Use of Augmented Reality to Guide the Intraoperative Frozen Section During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Bianchi, Lorenzo
    Chessa, Francesco
    Angiolini, Andrea
    Cercenelli, Laura
    Lodi, Simone
    Bortolani, Barbara
    Molinaroli, Enrico
    Casablanca, Carlo
    Droghetti, Matteo
    Gaudiano, Caterina
    Mottaran, Angelo
    Porreca, Angelo
    Golfieri, Rita
    Romagnoli, Daniele
    Giunchi, Francesca
    Fiorentino, Michelangelo
    Piazza, Pietro
    Puliatti, Stefano
    Diciotti, Stefano
    Marcelli, Emanuela
    Mottrie, Alexandre
    Schiavina, Riccardo
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2021, 80 (04) : 480 - 488
  • [39] Technique of Pelvic Lymphadenectomy After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer
    Png, Keng-Siang
    Koch, Michael O.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 (12) : 1600 - 1604
  • [40] Safety and Peri-Operative Outcomes During Learning Curve of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy: A Multi-Institutional Study of Fellowship-Trained Robotic Surgeons Versus Experienced Open Radical Prostatectomy Surgeons Incorporating Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy
    Leroy, Timothy J.
    Thiel, David D.
    Duchene, David A.
    Parker, Alex S.
    Igel, Todd C.
    Wehle, Michael J.
    Goetzl, Manilo
    Thrasher, J. Brantley
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2010, 24 (10) : 1665 - 1669