The Use of a Laparoscopic Bulldog Clamp to Control the Dorsal Vein Complex During Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Novel Technique

被引:12
|
作者
Tufek, Ilter [1 ]
Argun, Burak [2 ]
Atug, Fatih [3 ]
Keskin, Mehmet Selcuk [1 ]
Obek, Can [4 ]
Coskuner, Enis Rauf [1 ]
Kural, Ali Riza [2 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Acibadem Univ, Dept Urol, Sch Med, TR-34457 Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Acibadem Maslak Hosp, Dept Urol, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Istanbul Bilim Univ, Dept Urol, Sch Med, Istanbul, Turkey
[4] Istanbul Univ, Dept Urol, Cerrahpasa Med Sch, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS; VATTIKUTI-INSTITUTE PROSTATECTOMY; LIGATION; SUTURE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1089/end.2012.0013
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: To describe a novel technique to control dorsal vein complex (DVC) during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Patients and Methods: We have been using a laparoscopic bulldog clamp to control DVC before apical dissection and urethral division. Data of 50 patients who underwent DVC control with laparoscopic bulldog clamp (group 1) were retrospectively compared with 50 consecutive patients in whom DVC was controlled with suture ligation (group 2). In the bulldog and suture groups, 30 and 31 patients underwent concomitant bilateral extended pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND), respectively. Operative and anastomosis time, estimated blood loss (EBL), apical surgical margin positivity, and early continence rates were evaluated. Results: Patients in the bulldog group had significantly shorter operative time compared with patients in the suture group (146.8 vs 178.4 min, P=0.0005). Anastomosis time was significantly shorter in the bulldog group (12.3 vs 15.5min, P=0.002). There was no difference in EBL between the groups (185 vs 184.2 mL). Immediate, postoperative first and third month continence rates were 62% vs 44%, 74% vs 60%, 90% vs 74% in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Although continence rates were better in favor of the bulldog group at each evaluation period, the difference did not reach statistical difference. None of the patients in both groups had apical surgical margin positivity. Conclusions: The use of a laparoscopic bulldog clamp to control DVC was associated with shorter operation and anastomosis time and a trend toward quicker recovery of continence. This technique provides clear vision during apical dissection and urethral division while potentially minimizing the external sphincteric trauma. Prospective randomized trials are needed for better evaluation of this technique.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 33
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Use of a Bulldog Clamp to Control the Dorsal Vein Complex During Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Tufek, Ilter
    Atug, Fatih
    Argun, Burak
    Keskin, Selcuk
    Obek, Can
    Coskuner, Enis
    Kural, Ali Riza
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 (12) : 1605 - 1608
  • [2] Randomised comparison of techniques for control of the dorsal venous complex during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Feng, Tom
    Heulitt, Gerald
    Lee, Janet J.
    Liao, Michael
    Li, Hsin-Fang
    Porter, James R.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 126 (05) : 586 - 594
  • [3] Suture versus staple ligation of the dorsal venous complex during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Wu, Simon D.
    Meeks, Joshua J.
    Cashy, John
    Perry, Kent T.
    Nadler, Robert B.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 106 (03) : 385 - 389
  • [4] A technique of pretightening dorsal vein complex can facilitate laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Chen, Wei
    Zhou, Jin-Cai
    Xu, Lei
    Hu, Xiao-Yi
    Xu, Zhi-Bing
    Guo, Jian-Ming
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2019, 21 (06) : 628 - 630
  • [5] Suture versus staple ligation of the dorsal venous complex during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy - Editorial Comment
    Tewari, Ashutosh K.
    Tan, Gerald Y.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 106 (03) : 389 - 390
  • [6] Narrowing of the Dorsal Vein Complex Technique during Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: A Simple Trick to Simplify the Control of Venous Plexus
    Garcia-Segui, Alejandro
    Sanchez, Manuel
    Verges, Aleixandre
    Caballero, Juan P.
    Galan, Juan A.
    UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2014, 11 (05) : 1873 - 1877
  • [7] Outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Murphy, Declan G.
    Challacombe, Benjamin J.
    Costello, Anthony J.
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2009, 11 (01) : 94 - 99
  • [8] Stapling for prostate pedicle management during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Wit, Esther M. K.
    De Jong, Jeroen
    Acar, Cenk
    Van Muilekom, Erik
    Tillier, Corinne
    De Blok, Willem
    Van Der Poel, Henk
    MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2016, 68 (05) : 429 - 436
  • [9] Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in Patients with Previous Abdominal Surgery: A Novel Laparoscopic Adhesiolysis Technique
    Boylu, Ugur
    Oommen, Mathew
    Raynor, Mathew
    Lee, Benjamin R.
    Thomas, Raju
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2010, 24 (02) : 229 - 232
  • [10] Downsides of Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Limitations and Complications
    Murphy, Declan G.
    Bjartell, Anders
    Ficarra, Vincenzo
    Graefen, Markus
    Haese, Alexander
    Montironi, Rodolfo
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Moul, Judd W.
    Novara, Giacomo
    Sauter, Guido
    Sulser, Tullio
    van der Poel, Henk
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2010, 57 (05) : 735 - 746