Responses of Crop Pests and Natural Enemies to Wildflower Borders Depends on Functional Group

被引:18
|
作者
McCabe, Ellie [1 ]
Loeb, Gregory [2 ]
Grab, Heather [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ New Hampshire, Dept Biol Sci, Durham, NH 03824 USA
[2] Cornell Univ, New York State Agr Expt Stn, Dept Entomol, Geneva, NY 14456 USA
[3] Cornell Univ, Dept Entomol, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
关键词
TARNISHED PLANT BUG; STELIDOTA-GEMINATA SAY; BIOLOGICAL-CONTROL; HABITAT MANAGEMENT; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; PITFALL TRAPS; STRIPS; COLEOPTERA; CONSERVATION; BIODIVERSITY;
D O I
10.3390/insects8030073
中图分类号
Q96 [昆虫学];
学科分类号
摘要
Increased homogeneity of agricultural landscapes in the last century has led to a loss of biodiversity and ecosystem services. However, management practices such as wildflower borders offer supplementary resources to many beneficial arthropods. There is evidence that these borders can increase beneficial arthropod abundance, including natural enemies of many pests. However, this increase in local habitat diversity can also have effects on pest populations, and these effects are not well-studied. In this study, we investigated how wildflower borders affect both natural enemies and pests within an adjacent strawberry crop. Significantly more predators were captured in strawberry plantings with wildflower borders versus plantings without wildflowers, but this effect depended on sampling method. Overall, herbivore populations were lower in plots with a wildflower border; however, responses to wildflower borders varied across specific pest groups. Densities of Lygus lineolaris (Tarnished Plant Bug), a generalist pest, increased significantly in plots that had a border, while Stelidota geminata (Strawberry Sap Beetle) decreased in strawberry fields with a wildflower border. These results suggest that wildflower borders may support the control of some pest insects; however, if the pest is a generalist and can utilize the resources of the wildflower patch, their populations may increase within the crop.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] USE OF ENTOMOPHAGOUS NATURAL ENEMIES AGAINST CROP PESTS IN CHINA
    QIU, SB
    AGRONOMIE, 1986, 6 (09): : 857 - 861
  • [2] Habitat use by crop pests and natural enemies in a Mediterranean vineyard agroecosystem
    Shapira, Idan
    Gavish-Regev, Efrat
    Sharon, Rakefet
    Harari, Ally R.
    Kishinevsky, Miriam
    Keasar, Tamar
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 267 : 109 - 118
  • [3] Assessing the impact of arthropod natural enemies on crop pests at the field scale
    Macfadyen, Sarina
    Davies, Andrew P.
    Zalucki, Myron P.
    INSECT SCIENCE, 2015, 22 (01) : 20 - 34
  • [4] LONG-TERM EFFECTS OF PESTICIDES ON NATURAL ENEMIES OF CEREAL CROP PESTS
    BURN, AJ
    PESTICIDES AND NON-TARGET INVERTEBRATES, 1989, : 177 - 193
  • [6] Flower availability drives effects of wildflower strips on ground-dwelling natural enemies and crop yield
    Mei, Zulin
    de Groot, Gerard Arjen
    Kleijn, David
    Dimmers, Wim
    van Gils, Stijn
    Lammertsma, Dennis
    van Kats, Ruud
    Scheper, Jeroen
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 319
  • [7] Effect of abiotic factors on population dynamics of insect pests and natural enemies in potato crop
    Thakur, Meena
    Rawat, Shashi
    JOURNAL OF AGROMETEOROLOGY, 2014, 16 (02): : 187 - 191
  • [8] Influence of the Sulphur Application Method on Pests, Diseases and Natural Enemies in a Greenhouse Pepper Crop
    Gazquez, J. C.
    Lopez, J. C.
    Baeza, E. J.
    Perez-Parra, J. J.
    Perez, C.
    Meca, D. E.
    Navarro, S.
    INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON HIGH TECHNOLOGY FOR GREENHOUSE SYSTEMS: GREENSYS2009, 2011, (893): : 1309 - 1316
  • [9] Efficacy of crop cover netting against cabbage pests and their natural enemies and relevance of oilseed rape
    Martin Ludwig
    Rainer Meyhöfer
    Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection, 2016, 123 : 331 - 338
  • [10] Efficacy of crop cover netting against cabbage pests and their natural enemies and relevance of oilseed rape
    Ludwig, Martin
    Meyhoefer, Rainer
    JOURNAL OF PLANT DISEASES AND PROTECTION, 2016, 123 (06) : 331 - 338