The Instrumental Role of Personality Traits: Using Mixture Structural Equation Modeling to Investigate Individual Differences in the Relationships Between the Big Five Traits and Life Satisfaction

被引:19
作者
Heidemeier, Heike [1 ]
Goeritz, Anja S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Inst Psychol, Jaegerstr 17-19, D-52056 Aachen, Germany
[2] Albert Ludwigs Univ Freiburg, Work & Org Psychol, Engelbergerstr 41, D-79085 Freiburg, Germany
关键词
Life satisfaction; Big Five traits; Whole trait theory; Individual differences; Mixture structural equation modeling; JOB-SATISFACTION; NEGATIVE AFFECT; 5-FACTOR MODEL; EXTROVERSION; NEUROTICISM; GROWTH; HERITABILITY; MINDFULNESS; PERFORMANCE; ADAPTATION;
D O I
10.1007/s10902-015-9708-7
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Adopting a social-cognitive view of personality, this study investigated individual differences in the direct (i.e., temperamental) and indirect (i.e., instrumental) effects of the Big Five traits on life satisfaction. For that purpose, we examined a process model in which domain-based emotional experiences mediated the instrumental effects of personality traits. Using mixture structural equation modeling (n = 2682 adults) we found that the direct effects of neuroticism and extraversion were invariant across individuals, whereas the instrumental effects of the Big Five traits varied across two unobserved subgroups. In one of these subgroups (60 %), conscientiousness, openness, agreeableness, and neuroticism had relatively larger effects on domain-based affect and life satisfaction. In a second subgroup (40 %), extraversion was comparatively more relevant for explaining domain-based affect and life satisfaction. Our findings provide evidence that the instrumental role of personality traits and judgmental processes may act in accord to promote subjective well-being.
引用
收藏
页码:2595 / 2612
页数:18
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, OXFORD HDB PERSONALI, DOI DOI 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780195398991.013.0003
[2]   Openness and ambiguity intolerance: Their differential relations to well-being in the context of an academic life transition [J].
Bardi, Anat ;
Guerra, Valeschka M. ;
Ramdeny, G. Sharadeh D. .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2009, 47 (03) :219-223
[3]   THE BIG 5 PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB-PERFORMANCE - A METAANALYSIS [J].
BARRICK, MR ;
MOUNT, MK .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 44 (01) :1-26
[4]   A FRAMEWORK FOR STUDYING PERSONALITY IN THE STRESS PROCESS [J].
BOLGER, N ;
ZUCKERMAN, A .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 69 (05) :890-902
[5]  
Davidson R. J., 2005, SCI WELL BEING, P107
[6]   The happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being [J].
DeNeve, KM ;
Cooper, H .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1998, 124 (02) :197-229
[7]   Neuroticism Predicts Reactions to Cues of Social Inclusion [J].
Denissen, Jaap J. A. ;
Penke, Lars .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2008, 22 (06) :497-517
[8]   THE SATISFACTION WITH LIFE SCALE [J].
DIENER, E ;
EMMONS, RA ;
LARSEN, RJ ;
GRIFFIN, S .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 1985, 49 (01) :71-75
[9]  
Diener E., 1999, WELL BEING FDN HEDON, P213, DOI [10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00731, DOI 10.3389/FPSYG.2017.00731]
[10]   Life cycle happiness and its sources - Intersections of psychology, economics, and demography [J].
Easterlin, Richard A. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 27 (04) :463-482