Session perceived exertion and affective responses to self-selected and imposed cycle exercise of the same intensity in young men

被引:12
作者
Haile, Luke [1 ]
Goss, Fredric L. [2 ]
Robertson, Robert J. [2 ]
Andreacci, Joseph L. [3 ]
Gallagher, Michael, Jr. [4 ]
Nagle, Elizabeth F. [2 ]
机构
[1] Lock Haven Univ Penn, Dept Hlth Sci, Lock Haven, PA 17445 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Hlth & Phys Act, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Bloomsburg Univ Penn, Dept Exercise Sci, Bloomsburg, PA 17815 USA
[4] Univ Cent Arkansas, Dept Kinesiol & Phys Educ, Conway, AR USA
关键词
RPE; OMNI Scale; Affect; Affective valence; Feeling Scale; Cycle ergometry; TRAINING LOAD; RPE METHOD; IMPACT; OVERWEIGHT; CAFFEINE; VALIDITY; INTERVAL; PAIN;
D O I
10.1007/s00421-013-2604-0
中图分类号
Q4 [生理学];
学科分类号
071003 ;
摘要
Session perceived exertion (S-RPE) and session affective responses (S-AR) are post-exercise estimates of the global responses experienced during exercise. To compare S-RPE and S-AR to acute RPE (A-RPE) and acute AR (A-AR) during self-selected (SS) and imposed (IMP) exercise of the same workload. Thirty-two males (22.3 +/- A 2.2 years) performed two, 20-min cycle exercise trials. In the SS trial, subjects adjusted SS workload every 5 min. In the IMP trial, workload was automatically adjusted to the SS workload. Experimental (EXP, n = 16) subjects were unaware that workload was the same between the trials. Control (CON, n = 16) subjects were aware that both trials were of the same workload. A-RPE and A-AR were measured every 5 min using the OMNI Scale and Feeling Scale, respectively. Fifteen minutes following a cool-down, subjects rated S-RPE and S-AR. Session and exercise values were compared between trials and groups using ANOVA. No between-group differences were observed. There were no differences between the SS and IMP trials for S-RPE, A-RPE, S-AR and A-AR. For SS and IMP trials, S-RPE was greater than A-RPE (4.6 +/- A 1.5 vs. 3.9 +/- A 1.4; 4.3 +/- A 1.6 vs. 3.7 +/- A 1.4, respectively, p < 0.05). S-AR was greater than A-AR for the SS trial (1.9 +/- A 1.3 vs. 2.3 +/- A 1.5, p < 0.05), but not the IMP trial (1.9 +/- A 1.5 vs. 2.2 +/- A 1.4). A mismatch exists between the session and acute exercise values for RPE and AR during the SS cycle exercise in young males.
引用
收藏
页码:1755 / 1765
页数:11
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   A comparison of the effects of caffeine following abstinence and normal caffeine use [J].
Addicott, Merideth A. ;
Laurienti, Paul J. .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2009, 207 (03) :423-431
[2]   A Comparison of Methods Used for Quantifying Internal Training Load in Women Soccer Players [J].
Alexiou, Helen ;
Coutts, Aaron J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS PHYSIOLOGY AND PERFORMANCE, 2008, 3 (03) :320-330
[3]   Quantifying Training Intensity Distribution in a Group of Norwegian Professional Soccer Players [J].
Algroy, Erling A. ;
Hetlelid, Ken J. ;
Seiler, Stephen ;
Pedersen, Jorg I. Stray .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS PHYSIOLOGY AND PERFORMANCE, 2011, 6 (01) :70-81
[4]  
Anderson L, 2003, J STRENGTH COND RES, V17, P734
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1998, BORGS PERCEIVED EXER
[6]   Effect of caffeine on RPE and perceptions of pain, arousal, and pleasure/displeasure during a cycling time trial in endurance trained and active men [J].
Astorino, Todd A. ;
Cottrell, Trisha ;
Lozano, Andrea Talhami ;
Aburto-Pratt, Kylan ;
Duhon, Jessica .
PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 2012, 106 (02) :211-217
[7]   EFFECT OF TWO RECOVERY METHODS ON REPEATED CLOSED-HANDED AND OPEN-HANDED WEIGHT-ASSISTED PULL-UPS [J].
Bacon, Nicholas T. ;
Wingo, Jonathan E. ;
Richardson, Mark T. ;
Ryan, Greg A. ;
Pangallo, Tracey C. ;
Bishop, Phillip A. .
JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2012, 26 (05) :1348-1352
[8]  
BORG G, 1970, Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, V2, P92
[9]  
Charro MA, 2010, J SPORT MED PHYS FIT, V50, P229
[10]   Enhanced mood and psychomotor performance by a caffeine-containing energy capsule in fatigued individuals [J].
Childs, Emma ;
de Wit, Harriet .
EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2008, 16 (01) :13-21