Proposed agenda for the measurement of quality-of-care outcomes in oncology practice

被引:41
作者
Mandelblatt, JS
Ganz, PA
Kahn, KL
机构
[1] Georgetown Univ, Sch Med, Inst Hlth Care Res & Policy, Dept Med, Washington, DC USA
[2] Georgetown Univ, Sch Med, Lombardi Canc Ctr, Washington, DC USA
[3] Jonsson Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Med, Los Angeles, CA 90034 USA
[4] Jonsson Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Hlth Serv Res, Los Angeles, CA 90034 USA
[5] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Publ Hlth, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[6] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Med, Div Gen Internal Med & Hlth Serv Res, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[7] RAND, Hlth Program, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.1999.17.8.2614
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Cancer is an important disease, and health care services have the potential to improve the quality and quantity of life for cancer patients. The delivery of these services also has recently been well codified. Given this framework, cancer care presents a unique opportunity for clinicians to develop and test outcome measures across diverse practice settings. Recently, the institute of Medicine released a report reviewing the quality of cancer care in the United States and called for further development and monitoring of quality indicators. Thus, as we move into the 21st century, professional and regulatory agencies will be seeking to expand process measures and develop and validate outcomes-oriented measures for cancer and other diseases. Far such measures to be clinically relevant and feasible, it is key that the oncology community lake an active leadership role in this process, To set the stage for such activities, this article first reviews broad methodologic concerns involved in selecting measures of the quality of care, using breast cancer to exemplify key issues. We then use the case of breast cancer to review the different phases of cancer care and provide examples of phase-specific measures that after careful operationalization, testing, and validation, could be used as the basis of an agenda for measuring the quality of; breast cancer care in oncology practice. The diffusion of process and outcome measures into practice; the practicality, reliability, and validity of these measures; and the impact that these indicators have on practice patterns and the health of populations will be key to evaluating the success of such quality-of-care paradigms. Ultimately, improved quality of care should translate into morbidity and mortality reductions. (C) 1999 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:2614 / 2622
页数:9
相关论文
共 69 条
  • [1] ABE O, 1995, NEW ENGL J MED, V333, P1444
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1996, J Clin Oncol, V14, P671
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1992, Lancet, V339, P1
  • [4] [Anonymous], MED STRATEGY QUALITY
  • [5] The regulation of mammography
    Bassett, LW
    [J]. SEMINARS IN ULTRASOUND CT AND MRI, 1996, 17 (05) : 415 - 423
  • [6] Bast RC, 1998, J CLIN ONCOL, V16, P793
  • [7] A PUBLIC HOSPITAL CLOSES - IMPACT ON PATIENTS ACCESS TO CARE AND HEALTH-STATUS
    BINDMAN, AB
    KEANE, D
    LURIE, N
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1990, 264 (22): : 2899 - 2904
  • [8] Quality of care .1. What is it?
    Blumenthal, D
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (12) : 891 - 894
  • [9] VALUE OF PREOPERATIVE BONE AND LIVER SCANS AND ALKALINE-PHOSPHATASE LEVELS IN THE EVALUATION OF BREAST-CANCER PATIENTS
    BRAR, HS
    SISLEY, JF
    JOHNSON, RH
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1993, 165 (02) : 221 - 223
  • [10] Quality of health care .2. Measuring quality of care
    Brook, RH
    McGlynn, EA
    Cleary, PD
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (13) : 966 - 970