Thresholds of ultrasound synovial abnormalities for knee osteoarthritis - a cross sectional study in the general population

被引:16
作者
Sarmanova, A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hall, M. [2 ,3 ,5 ]
Fernandes, G. S. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Valdes, A. M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Walsh, D. A. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Doherty, M. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Zhang, W. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Div Rheumatol Orthopaed & Dermatol, Sch Med, Nottingham, England
[2] Arthrit Res UK Pain Ctr, Nottingham, England
[3] NIHR Nottingham BRC, Nottingham, England
[4] Arthrit Res UK Ctr Sports Exercise & Osteoarthrit, Nottingham, England
[5] Univ Nottingham, Sch Hlth Sci, Nottingham, England
关键词
Ultrasound; Ultrasonography; Knee pain; Osteoarthritis; Synovitis; LINE DRAWING ATLAS; REFERENCE VALUES; EULAR REPORT; PREVALENCE; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; JOINT; PAIN; INFLAMMATION; METAANALYSIS; SEVERITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.joca.2018.09.018
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To establish "normal" ranges for synovial thickness and effusion detected by ultrasound (US) and to determine cut-offs associated with knee pain (KP) and radiographic knee osteoarthritis (RKOA) in the community. Methods: 147 women and 152 men >= 40 years old were randomly selected from the Nottingham KP and Related Health in the Community (KPIC) cohort (n = 9506). The "normal" range was established using the percentile method in 163 participants who had no KP and no RKOA. Optimal (maximum sensitivity and specificity) and high specificity (90%) cut-offs were established using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis in a comparison between people with both KP and RKOA and normal controls. Results: Effusion and synovial hypertrophy differed by gender but not by age or laterality, therefore gender-specific reference limits were estimated. However, the "normal" ranges between men and women were similar for effusion (0-10.3 mm vs 0-9.8 mm), but different for synovial hypertrophy (0 -6.8 mmvs 0-5.4 mm). Power Doppler Signal (PDS) in the healthy controls was uncommon (1.2% in men and 0.0% in women). The optimal cut-off was 7.4 mm for men and 5.3 mm for women for effusion, and 3.7 and 1.6 for hypertrophy respectively. The high specificity cut-off was 8.9 for men and 7.8 for women for effusion, and 5.8 and 4.2 for hypertrophy respectively. Conclusions: US effusion and synovial hypertrophy but not PDS are common, but differ by gender, in community-derived people without painful knee OA. Currently used cut-offs for abnormality need reappraisal. (c) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Osteoarthritis Research Society International. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:435 / 443
页数:9
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Population prevalence of ultrasound features of osteoarthritis in the hand, knee and hip at age 63 years: the Newcastle thousand families birth cohort [J].
Abraham, Ajay M. ;
Pearce, Mark S. ;
Mann, Kay D. ;
Francis, Roger M. ;
Birrell, Fraser .
BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2014, 15
[2]  
Aleo E, 2014, CLIN EXP RHEUMATOL, V32, pS91
[3]   DEVELOPMENT OF CRITERIA FOR THE CLASSIFICATION AND REPORTING OF OSTEOARTHRITIS - CLASSIFICATION OF OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE KNEE [J].
ALTMAN, R ;
ASCH, E ;
BLOCH, D ;
BOLE, G ;
BORENSTEIN, D ;
BRANDT, K ;
CHRISTY, W ;
COOKE, TD ;
GREENWALD, R ;
HOCHBERG, M ;
HOWELL, D ;
KAPLAN, D ;
KOOPMAN, W ;
LONGLEY, S ;
MANKIN, H ;
MCSHANE, DJ ;
MEDSGER, T ;
MEENAN, R ;
MIKKELSEN, W ;
MOSKOWITZ, R ;
MURPHY, W ;
ROTHSCHILD, B ;
SEGAL, M ;
SOKOLOFF, L ;
WOLFE, F .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1986, 29 (08) :1039-1049
[4]  
Armitage P., 2002, STAT METHODS MED RES
[6]   Yet more evidence that osteoarthritis is not a cartilage disease [J].
Brandt, K. D. ;
Radin, E. L. ;
Dieppe, P. A. ;
van de Putte, L. .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2006, 65 (10) :1261-1264
[7]   Diagnosis of osteoarthritis: Imaging [J].
Braun, Hillary J. ;
Gold, Garry E. .
BONE, 2012, 51 (02) :278-288
[8]  
Bureau Nathalie J, 2016, Curr Radiol Rep, V4, P44
[9]  
Ceriotti Ferruccio, 2008, EJIFCC, V19, P106
[10]  
Charan Jaykaran, 2013, Indian J Psychol Med, V35, P121, DOI 10.4103/0253-7176.116232