Comparative efficacy of serological diagnostic methods and evaluation of polymerase chain reaction for diagnosis of bovine brucellosis

被引:1
作者
Neha [1 ]
Verma, A. K. [1 ]
Kumar, A. [2 ]
Ahmed, I [1 ]
机构
[1] UP Pt Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Pashu Chikitsa Vigyan, Dept Vet Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Mathura 281001, Uttar Pradesh, India
[2] UP Pt Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Pashu Chikitsa Vigyan, Dept Vet Microbiol, Mathura 281001, Uttar Pradesh, India
关键词
Bovine Brucellosis; I-ELISA; PCR; RBPT; PCR; MELITENSIS; CULTURE; INDIA;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
The aim of present study was to compare the diagnostic performance of the different Brucella abortus antigen based serological and molecular tests such as Rose Bengal Plate Test (RBPT), indirect enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (I-ELISA) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Out of 89 samples, 44 were positive by I-ELISA, 18 by RBPT and 21 by PCR. Substantial agreement was observed between PCR and I-ELISA (kappa=0.48). A slight degree of agreement was observed between RBPT and I-ELISA and PCR (kappa=0.18) and RBPT and PCR (kappa=0.11). Indirect enzyme linked immunosorbent assay detected more samples as positive among these tests. In conclusion, I-ELISA can be routinely used for an accurate and efficient diagnosis of Brucella infection, because the chances of non-detection of an infected animal in I-ELISA are minimal. However, PCR could be used as a supplement and complement test along with I-ELISA for identification and differentiation of bovine brucellosis.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 281
页数:3
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Al-Garadia MA, 2011, J ANIM VET ADV, V10, P1437
[2]  
ALTON GG, 1975, MONOGR SER WHO, V55, P112
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, OIE MAN STAND DIAGN
[4]   DIFFERENTIATION OF BRUCELLA-ABORTUS-BV-1, BRUCELLA-ABORTUS-BV-2, AND BRUCELLA-ABORTUS-BV-4, BRUCELLA-MELITENSIS, BRUCELLA-OVIS, AND BRUCELLA-SUIS-BV-1 BY PCR [J].
BRICKER, BJ ;
HALLING, SM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1994, 32 (11) :2660-2666
[5]   Evaluation of PCR methods for detection of Brucella strains from culture and tissues [J].
Ciftci, Alper ;
Ica, Tuba ;
Savasan, Serap ;
Sareyyupoglu, Baris ;
Akan, Mehmet ;
Diker, Kadir Serdar .
TROPICAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND PRODUCTION, 2017, 49 (04) :755-763
[6]   Comparison of serology, culture, and PCR for detection of brucellosis in slaughtered camels in Iran [J].
Ghorbani A. ;
Rabbani Khorasgani M. ;
Zarkesh-Esfahani H. ;
Sharifiyazdi H. ;
Kashani A.D. ;
Emami H. .
Comparative Clinical Pathology, 2013, 22 (5) :913-917
[7]   Rapid detection of Brucella species in cattle semen by PCR [J].
Kaushik, P. ;
Singh, D. K. ;
Tiwari, A. K. ;
Kataria, R. S. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ANIMAL RESEARCH, 2006, 30 (01) :25-28
[8]   Screening Brucella spp. in bovine raw milk by real-time quantitative PCR and conventional methods in a pilot region of vaccination, Edirne, Turkey [J].
Kaynak-Onurdag, F. ;
Okten, S. ;
Sen, B. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2016, 99 (05) :3351-3357
[9]  
Kumar A, 2016, INDIAN J ANIM SCI, V86, P131
[10]  
Kumar N., 2009, Journal of Veterinary Public Health, V7, P129