What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about probiotics as preventive interventions?

被引:11
作者
Braga, Vinicius Lopes [1 ,2 ]
dos Santos Rocha, Luana Pompeu [1 ,2 ]
Bernardo, Daniel Damasceno [1 ,2 ]
Cruz, Carolina de Oliveira [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Riera, Rachel [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Sao Paulo Unifesp, EPM, Discipline Evidence Based Hlth, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Sao Paulo Unifesp, EPM, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Sao Paulo Unifesp, Evidence Based Hlth Program, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[4] Cochrane Brazil, Sao Paulo, Brazil
来源
SAO PAULO MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2017年 / 135卷 / 06期
关键词
Review [publication type; Probiotics; Preventive medicine; Evidence-based medicine; Evidence-based practice;
D O I
10.1590/1516-3180.2017.0310241017
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Probiotics have been used for a range of clinical situations and their use is strongly encouraged by the media worldwide. This study identified and summarized all Cochrane systematic reviews about the preventive effects of probiotics in clinical practice. DESIGN AND SETTING: Review of systematic reviews, conducted in the Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo (Unifesp). METHODS: We included all Cochrane reviews on any probiotics when they were used as preventive interventions and compared with no intervention, placebo or any other pharmacological or non-pharmacological intervention. RESULTS: 17 Cochrane systematic reviews fulfilled our inclusion criteria and were summarized in this report. None of the reviews included in the present study provided high-quality evidence for any outcome. The benefits from use of probiotics included decreased incidence of antibiotic-associated diarrhea and Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea; decreased incidence of upper respiratory tract infections and duration of episodes; decreased need for antibiotics and absences from school due to colds; and decreased incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Probiotics seem to decrease the incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus, birthweight, risk of vaginal infection and incidence of eczema. CONCLUSION: Despite the marketing and the benefits associated with probiotics, there is little scientific evidence supporting the use of probiotics. None of the reviews provided any high-quality evidence for prevention of illnesses through use of probiotics. More trials are needed to gain better knowledge of probiotics and to confirm when their use is beneficial and cost-effective.
引用
收藏
页码:578 / 586
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [31] What do physical therapists think about evidence-based practice? A systematic review
    da Silva, Tatiane Mota
    Menezes Costa, Luciola da Cunha
    Garcia, Alessandra Narciso
    Pena Costa, Leonardo Oliveira
    MANUAL THERAPY, 2015, 20 (03) : 388 - 401
  • [32] What Do We Know about Knowledge Brokers in Paediatric Rehabilitation? A Systematic Search and Narrative Summary
    Taylor, Jacqueline Schleifer
    Verrier, Molly C.
    Landry, Michel D.
    PHYSIOTHERAPY CANADA, 2014, 66 (02) : 143 - 152
  • [33] Systematic reviews showed insufficient evidence for clinical practice in 2004: what about in 2011? The next appeal for the evidence-based medicine age
    Fortes Villas Boas, Paulo Jose
    Spagnuolo, Regina Stella
    Kamegasawa, Amelia
    Braz, Leandro Gobbo
    do Valle, Adriana Polachini
    Jorge, Eliane Chaves
    Bok Yoo, Hugo Hyung
    Maria Cataneo, Antonio Jose
    Correa, Ione
    Fukushima, Fernanda Bono
    do Nascimento, Paulo, Jr.
    Pinheiro Modolo, Norma Sueli
    Teixeira, Marise Silva
    de Oliveira Vidal, Edison Iglesias
    Daher, Solange Ramires
    El Dib, Regina
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2013, 19 (04) : 633 - 637