What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about probiotics as preventive interventions?

被引:11
|
作者
Braga, Vinicius Lopes [1 ,2 ]
dos Santos Rocha, Luana Pompeu [1 ,2 ]
Bernardo, Daniel Damasceno [1 ,2 ]
Cruz, Carolina de Oliveira [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Riera, Rachel [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Sao Paulo Unifesp, EPM, Discipline Evidence Based Hlth, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Sao Paulo Unifesp, EPM, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Sao Paulo Unifesp, Evidence Based Hlth Program, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[4] Cochrane Brazil, Sao Paulo, Brazil
来源
SAO PAULO MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2017年 / 135卷 / 06期
关键词
Review [publication type; Probiotics; Preventive medicine; Evidence-based medicine; Evidence-based practice;
D O I
10.1590/1516-3180.2017.0310241017
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Probiotics have been used for a range of clinical situations and their use is strongly encouraged by the media worldwide. This study identified and summarized all Cochrane systematic reviews about the preventive effects of probiotics in clinical practice. DESIGN AND SETTING: Review of systematic reviews, conducted in the Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo (Unifesp). METHODS: We included all Cochrane reviews on any probiotics when they were used as preventive interventions and compared with no intervention, placebo or any other pharmacological or non-pharmacological intervention. RESULTS: 17 Cochrane systematic reviews fulfilled our inclusion criteria and were summarized in this report. None of the reviews included in the present study provided high-quality evidence for any outcome. The benefits from use of probiotics included decreased incidence of antibiotic-associated diarrhea and Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea; decreased incidence of upper respiratory tract infections and duration of episodes; decreased need for antibiotics and absences from school due to colds; and decreased incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Probiotics seem to decrease the incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus, birthweight, risk of vaginal infection and incidence of eczema. CONCLUSION: Despite the marketing and the benefits associated with probiotics, there is little scientific evidence supporting the use of probiotics. None of the reviews provided any high-quality evidence for prevention of illnesses through use of probiotics. More trials are needed to gain better knowledge of probiotics and to confirm when their use is beneficial and cost-effective.
引用
收藏
页码:578 / 586
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [21] The PRISMA Statement - what should be reported about systematic reviews?
    Antes, G.
    von Elm, E.
    DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2009, 134 (33) : 1619 - 1619
  • [22] What do clinical practice guidelines say about deprescribing? A scoping review
    Langford, Aili Veronica
    Warriach, Imaan
    McEvoy, Aisling M.
    Karaim, Elisa
    Chand, Shyleen
    Turner, Justin P.
    Thompson, Wade
    Farrell, Barbara J.
    Pollock, Danielle
    Moriarty, Frank
    Gnjidic, Danijela
    Ailabouni, Nagham J.
    Reeve, Emily
    BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2025, 34 (01) : 28 - 39
  • [23] What do we know about different models of providing palliative care? Findings from a systematic review of reviews
    Brereton, Louise
    Clark, Joseph
    Ingleton, Christine
    Gardiner, Clare
    Preston, Louise
    Ryan, Tony
    Goyder, Elizabeth
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 31 (09) : 781 - 797
  • [24] Quality of evidence of the efficacy of therapeutic interventions on patient-important outcomes in Cochrane's systematic reviews abstracts: A survey
    Maynie-Francois, Christine
    Tudrej, Benoit
    Tawil, Elodie
    Naudet, Florian
    Huas, Caroline
    Pouchain, Denis
    Vaillant-Roussel, Helene
    Jaafari, Nemat
    Boussageon, Remy
    THERAPIE, 2021, 76 (05): : 403 - 408
  • [25] Systematic reviews to support evidence-based psychiatry: what about schizophrenia?
    Morlino, Massimo
    Calento, Antonio
    Pannone, Gennaro
    Ventrella, Gianluca
    Schiavone, Vittorio
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2009, 15 (06) : 1025 - 1028
  • [26] Cochrane Reviews of non-medication-based psychotherapeutic and other interventions for schizophrenia, psychosis, and bipolar disorder: A systematic literature review
    Jung, Xenia Tricia
    Newton, Richard
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2009, 18 (04) : 239 - 249
  • [27] What do we know about the mechanisms of action of probiotics on factors involved in the pathogenesis of periodontitis? A scoping review of in vitro studies
    Routier, Arthur
    Blaizot, Alessandra
    Agossa, Kevimy
    Dubar, Marie
    ARCHIVES OF ORAL BIOLOGY, 2021, 129
  • [28] What methods do reviews of normative ethics literature use for search, selection, analysis, and synthesis? In-depth results from a systematic review of reviews
    Marcel Mertz
    Daniel Strech
    Hannes Kahrass
    Systematic Reviews, 6
  • [29] What do experimental animal models of mood disorders tell clinicians about influence of probiotics on the gut-brain axis?
    Staniak, Natasza
    Piaseczna-Spitaleri, Ewa
    Biala, Grazyna
    POSTEPY HIGIENY I MEDYCYNY DOSWIADCZALNEJ, 2022, 76 (01): : 380 - 394
  • [30] What methods do reviews of normative ethics literature use for search, selection, analysis, and synthesis? In-depth results from a systematic review of reviews
    Mertz, Marcel
    Strech, Daniel
    Kahrass, Hannes
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2017, 6