What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about probiotics as preventive interventions?

被引:11
|
作者
Braga, Vinicius Lopes [1 ,2 ]
dos Santos Rocha, Luana Pompeu [1 ,2 ]
Bernardo, Daniel Damasceno [1 ,2 ]
Cruz, Carolina de Oliveira [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Riera, Rachel [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Sao Paulo Unifesp, EPM, Discipline Evidence Based Hlth, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Sao Paulo Unifesp, EPM, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Sao Paulo Unifesp, Evidence Based Hlth Program, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[4] Cochrane Brazil, Sao Paulo, Brazil
来源
SAO PAULO MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2017年 / 135卷 / 06期
关键词
Review [publication type; Probiotics; Preventive medicine; Evidence-based medicine; Evidence-based practice;
D O I
10.1590/1516-3180.2017.0310241017
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Probiotics have been used for a range of clinical situations and their use is strongly encouraged by the media worldwide. This study identified and summarized all Cochrane systematic reviews about the preventive effects of probiotics in clinical practice. DESIGN AND SETTING: Review of systematic reviews, conducted in the Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo (Unifesp). METHODS: We included all Cochrane reviews on any probiotics when they were used as preventive interventions and compared with no intervention, placebo or any other pharmacological or non-pharmacological intervention. RESULTS: 17 Cochrane systematic reviews fulfilled our inclusion criteria and were summarized in this report. None of the reviews included in the present study provided high-quality evidence for any outcome. The benefits from use of probiotics included decreased incidence of antibiotic-associated diarrhea and Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea; decreased incidence of upper respiratory tract infections and duration of episodes; decreased need for antibiotics and absences from school due to colds; and decreased incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Probiotics seem to decrease the incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus, birthweight, risk of vaginal infection and incidence of eczema. CONCLUSION: Despite the marketing and the benefits associated with probiotics, there is little scientific evidence supporting the use of probiotics. None of the reviews provided any high-quality evidence for prevention of illnesses through use of probiotics. More trials are needed to gain better knowledge of probiotics and to confirm when their use is beneficial and cost-effective.
引用
收藏
页码:578 / 586
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for insomnia?
    Melo, Florence de Lucca
    Welko Mendoza, Juan Fulgencio
    Cruz Latorraca, Carolina de Oliveira
    Pacheco, Rafael Leite
    Cabrera Martimbianco, Ana Luiza
    Pachito, Daniela Vianna
    Riera, Rachel
    SAO PAULO MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 136 (06): : 579 - 585
  • [2] What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for treating psoriasis?
    Pacheco, Rafael Leite
    Hosni, Nicole Dittrich
    Cruz Latorraca, Carolina de Oliveira
    Cabrera Martimbianco, Ana Luiza
    Pachito, Daniela Vianna
    Yarak, Samira
    Riera, Rachel
    SAO PAULO MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 136 (04): : 354 - 360
  • [3] What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for vitamin D supplementation?
    Mateussi, Mariana Vendramin
    Cruz Latorraca, Carolina de Oliveira
    Daou, Julia Pozetti
    Cabrera Martimbianco, Ana Luiza
    Riera, Rachel
    Pacheco, Rafael Leite
    Pachito, Daniela Vianna
    SAO PAULO MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 135 (05): : 497 - 507
  • [4] What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about interventions for autism spectrum disorders?
    Lyra, Larissa
    Rizzo, Luiz Eduardo
    Sunahara, Camila Sa
    Pachito, Daniela Vianna
    Cruz Latorraca, Carolina de Oliveira
    Cabrera Martimbianco, Ana Luiza
    Riera, Rachel
    SAO PAULO MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 135 (02): : 192 - 201
  • [5] What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about diabetic retinopathy?
    Mozetic, Vania
    Daou, Julia Pozzetti
    Cabrera Martimbianco, Ana Luiza
    Riera, Rachel
    SAO PAULO MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 135 (01): : 79 - 87
  • [6] What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about cardiac arrest management?
    Pacheco, Rafael Leite
    Trevizo, Juliana
    de Souza, Caio Augusto
    Alves, Gabriel
    Sakaya, Bruno
    Thiago, Luciana
    Teixeira de Gois, Aecio Flavio
    Riera, Rachel
    SAO PAULO MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 136 (02): : 170 - 176
  • [7] What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about non-surgical interventions for urinary incontinence in women?
    Leal Freitas da Costa, Anderson Adriano
    Vasconcellos, Igor Martins
    Pacheco, Rafael Leite
    Katalin de Jarmy di Bella, Zsuzsanna Ilona
    Riera, Rachel
    SAO PAULO MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 136 (01): : 73 - 83
  • [8] What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about the management of irritable bowel syndrome?
    Pacheco, Rafael Leite
    Roizenblatt, Arnaldo
    Teixeira de Gois, Aecio Flavio
    Cruz Latorraca, Carolina de Oliveira
    Girardin Pimentel Mota, Carolina Frade Magalhaes
    Riera, Rachel
    SAO PAULO MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 137 (01): : 82 - 91
  • [9] What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about the use of cannabinoids in clinical practice?
    Cruz Latorraca, Carolina de Oliveira
    Pacheco, Rafael Leite
    Cabrera Martimbianco, Ana Luiza
    Pachito, Daniela Vianna
    Riera, Rachel
    SAO PAULO MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 136 (05): : 472 - 478
  • [10] What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about non-pharmacological interventions for treating cognitive decline and dementia?
    Vilela, Vitoria Carvalho
    Pacheco, Rafael Leite
    Cruz Latorraca, Carolina Oliveira
    Pachito, Daniela Vianna
    Riera, Rachel
    SAO PAULO MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 135 (03): : 309 - 320