Population pharmacokinetics of mycophenolate mofetil in pediatric patients early after liver transplantation

被引:8
|
作者
Wei, Yinyi [1 ]
Wu, Dongni [1 ]
Chen, Yiyu [1 ]
Dong, Chunqiang [2 ]
Qi, Jianying [1 ]
Wu, Yun [1 ]
Cai, Rongda [1 ]
Zhou, Siru [1 ]
Li, Chengxin [1 ]
Niu, Lulu [1 ]
Wu, Tingqing [1 ]
Xiao, Yang [1 ]
Liu, Taotao [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangxi Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Pharm, Nanning, Peoples R China
[2] Guangxi Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Organ Transplant, Nanning, Peoples R China
关键词
mycophenolate mofetil; population pharmacokinetics; liver transplantation; pediatric pharmacology; nonlinear mixed-effect modeling; ENTEROHEPATIC CIRCULATION; ACID PHARMACOKINETICS; DOSE OPTIMIZATION; RECIPIENTS; PHARMACODYNAMICS; TACROLIMUS; POLYMORPHISMS; LANSOPRAZOLE; MODEL;
D O I
10.3389/fphar.2022.1002628
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Objective: To investigate the factors influencing the pharmacokinetics of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in pediatric patients after liver transplantation, and to establish a population pharmacokinetics model, which can provide a reference for clinical dosage adjustment. Methods: A prospective study in a single center was performed on pediatric patients who were administrated with mycophenolate mofetil dispersible tablets (MMFdt) for at least 4 days after liver transplantation continuously. Blood samples were collected in ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid anticoagulant tubes before dosing and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 h after the morning intake of MMFdt. The concentrations of mycophenolic acid (MPA) in plasma were assayed with a validated reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography method. UGT1A8 518C > G, UGT1A9 -275T > A, UGT1A9 -2152C > T, UGT2B7 211G > T, SLC O 1B1 521T > C polymorphism were determined by Sanger sequencing. Nonlinear mixed effects modeling was used to establish the population pharmacokinetics (PPK) model. The predictability and stability of the model were internally evaluated by the goodness of fit plots, visual prediction check, normalized prediction errors, and bootstraps. Results: A two-compartment model with first-order absorption and first-order elimination was established with 115 MPA concentrations from 20 pediatric patients. The final model were: CL/F (L/h) = 14.8x(WT/7.5)(0.75)x(DOSE/11.16)(0.452)xe(0.06), Ka (h(-1)) = 2.02x(WT/7.5)(-0.25), Vc/F (L) = 6.01x(WT/7.5), Vp/F (L) = 269 (fixed), Q/F (L/h) = 15.4x(WT/7.5)(0.75)xe(1.39). Where CL/F was the apparent clearance rate, Ka was the absorption rate constant, Vc/F was the apparent distribution volume of the central compartment, Vp/F was the apparent distribution volume of the peripheral compartment, Q/F was the atrioventricular clearance rate, WT was the body weight of the subject, and DOSE was the MMFdt administered dose. The model indicated there was large inter-individual variability in CL/F and Q/F after multiple dosing of MMFdt. Internal evaluation results showed that the final model had good stability and prediction performance. Conclusion: A stable and predictive population pharmacokinetic model of MMFdt in pediatric patients after the early stage of liver transplantation was established. The pediatric patient's weight and the dose of MMFdt can be a reference to adjust the MMFdt dose.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Population pharmacokinetics of mycophenolate mofetil in Thai lupus nephritis patients
    Punyawudho, Baralee
    Lertdumrongluk, Paungpaga
    Somparn, Poorichaya
    Kittanamongkolchai, Wonngarm
    Traitanon, Opas
    Avihingsanon, Yingyos
    Vadcharavivad, Somratai
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2012, 50 (04) : 272 - 280
  • [2] Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Tacrolimus Early After Pediatric Liver Transplantation
    Musuamba, Flora T.
    Guy-Viterbo, Vanessa
    Reding, Raymond
    Verbeeck, Roger K.
    Wallemacq, Pierre
    THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 2014, 36 (01) : 54 - 61
  • [3] The renal benefit of mycophenolate mofetil after liver transplantation
    Haywood, Samuel
    Abecassis, Michael
    Levitsky, Josh
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2011, 25 (01) : E88 - E95
  • [4] Tacrolimus Exposure and Mycophenolate Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics Early After Liver Transplantation
    Saeves, Ingjerd
    Line, Pal-Dag
    Bremer, Sara
    Vethe, Nils T.
    Tveit, Ragnhild G.
    Meltevik, Tore J.
    Bergan, Stein
    THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 2014, 36 (01) : 46 - 53
  • [5] Mycophenolate mofetil for renal dysfunction after pediatric liver transplantation
    Evans, HM
    McKiernan, PJ
    Kelly, DA
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 79 (11) : 1575 - 1580
  • [6] Population pharmacokinetic analysis of tacrolimus early after Chinese pediatric liver transplantation
    Yang, Jian-wei
    Liao, Sha-sha
    Zhu, Li-qin
    Zhao, Yang
    Zhang, Yuan
    Sun, Xiao-ye
    Rao, Wei
    Qu, Wei
    Li, Wen-zhuo
    Sun, Li-ying
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2015, 53 (01) : 75 - 83
  • [7] Population pharmacokinetics and Bayesian estimation of mycophenolate mofetil in patients with autoimmune hepatitis
    Nanga, Tom M.
    Woillard, Jean-Baptiste
    Rousseau, Annick
    Marquet, Pierre
    Premaud, Aurelie
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 88 (11) : 4732 - 4741
  • [8] Population Pharmacokinetics of Tacrolimus in Pediatric Liver Transplantation: Early Posttransplantation Clearance
    Wallin, Johan E.
    Bergstrand, Martin
    Wilczek, Henryk E.
    Nydert, Per S.
    Karlsson, Mats O.
    Staatz, Christine E.
    THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 2011, 33 (06) : 663 - 672
  • [9] Safety of mycophenolate mofetil monotherapy in patients after liver transplantation
    Kamphues, Carsten
    Bova, Roberta
    Roecken, Christoph
    Neuhaus, Ruth
    Pratschke, Johann
    Neuhaus, Peter
    Neumann, Ulf P.
    ANNALS OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 14 (04) : 40 - 46
  • [10] Population pharmacokinetic analysis of tacrolimus in the first year after pediatric liver transplantation
    Guy-Viterbo, V.
    Scohy, A.
    Verbeeck, R. K.
    Reding, R.
    Wallemacq, P.
    Musuamba, Flora Tshinanu
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2013, 69 (08) : 1533 - 1542